In war films, scenes of soldiers smoking are commonplace. Almost everyone, from high-ranking generals to rank-and-file soldiers, smokes. Although each ** team has banned alcohol, they regard cigarettes as a necessity in the army and have always accompanied the army. During the Huaihai Campaign, the General Front Committee announced that each front-line soldier would be given a pack of cigarettes, triggering a series of interesting stories.
Military smoking, like doping in athletes, can relieve stress and improve combat effectiveness, and the effect is immediate. From the Napoleonic Wars to World War I, soldiers in field hospitals were privileged to smoke for the sole purpose of relieving their suffering and loneliness. During World War II, the war was brutal, and the war-weariness of front-line soldiers soared, and mental illness spiked in the face of death and being away from their families. Cigarettes have become an extremely important psychological support, and the problem of smoking among ordinary soldiers has become very serious. In order to maintain the morale of the soldiers, leaders must ensure that they have the right to smoke, even at all costs.
When the UK applied for aid from the US, cigarettes and coffee were the first choices. During World War II, the U.S. military provided front-line soldiers with a large number of "rations", including a box of cigarettes, so that soldiers could relax after a full meal. A cigarette can make a boring soldier let go of some worries and adjust his mentality. Although heavy smoking is physically harmful and addictive, it is an effective option for soldiers who are under mental stress to bring a sense of relief.
Cigarettes have another purpose: to fight hunger. Each ** team has clear weight requirements for front-line soldiers, and soldiers who are too obese cannot practice and improve, and smoking has become a means for some professional soldiers to resist hunger. The cost of a smoking ban is significantly higher than the cost of enforcing a ban. Therefore, most countries have strict "prohibition" in peacetime (with the exception of Russia), but no smoking is prohibited.
Why are there no smoking bans in various countries?First of all, alcoholism is easy to make mistakes. Drunk driving of aircraft and tanks is a high-probability event, and alcohol is a flammable product, which is cohabited with munitions, and the consequences of a fire are unimaginable. In contrast, cigarettes are relatively safe. In peacetime, cigarettes are loosely regulated, as they do bring a little solace to tired training and tired soldiers.
There are certain "rules" for soldiers to smoke, recruits are not allowed to smoke, and violators are severely punished. And veterans can smoke, this is to temper the will of the recruits. When veterans are stressed, they use smoking to relieve stress and relieve sorrow. In addition, cigarettes can also refresh people when they are sleepy. Therefore, in times of war, cigarettes are not only a material supply after ** and food, but also the spiritual food of the soldiers, which has played a huge role.
The harm of smoking to the health of soldiers is undoubtedly huge, so in peacetime, smoking is still strictly prohibited in all teams. Exceptions to smoking are limited to special periods. Cigarettes are not only the spiritual pillar of soldiers, but also the secret on the battlefield, which affects the psychological state and combat effectiveness of soldiers with their unique role.
This article profoundly examines the reasons behind the phenomenon of smoking among soldiers in war, and the unique role that cigarettes play in the military. Through a historical perspective, the author vividly describes the common phenomenon of smoking among soldiers during the war, as well as the positive role of smoking in improving combat capabilities and alleviating soldiers' mental illness.
At the beginning of the article, the example of the Battle of Huaihai arouses the reader's interest, skillfully connecting historical events, making the whole narrative more vivid and interesting. The depiction of soldiers smoking in the war scene makes people feel the pressure and loneliness of being on the battlefield. At the same time, through the analysis of the psychological state of soldiers during World War II, the practical role of cigarettes in alleviating the psychological illness of soldiers is demonstrated, so that readers can better understand why leaders of various countries would ensure the right of soldiers to smoke.
The article also clearly mentions the harm of smoking to the health of soldiers, expressing concern about this issue. However, the authors highlight the positive effects of smoking on soldiers' mental health in the context of war through explanations of mental stress. This discussion of the positive and negative aspects makes the article more comprehensive, not only at the level that smoking is harmful to physical health, but also pays attention to its role at the psychological level.
The article puts forward a reasonable explanation for why each team does not ban smoking, and compares the dangers of alcohol and cigarettes from the perspective of flammable products, so that readers have a deeper understanding of this decision. Cigarette control in peacetime, as well as the "rules" within the army, are also described in detail, which allows readers to better understand the culture and management methods within the army.
Overall, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the phenomenon of soldier smoking in war, and shows the multiple roles of cigarettes in the military through historical cases, psychological analysis, and rational explanations. At the same time, the warning of the health of smoking, as well as the control of peacetime, expressed a call for comprehensive care for soldiers.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!