According to the "Nihon Keizai Shimbun" report, Japan is considering exporting "Patriot" surface-to-air missiles at the request of the United States. As soon as this news came out, it immediately attracted widespread attention. After all, this is the first time that Japan intends to export lethal finished equipment since the formulation of the "Three Principles for the Transfer of Defense Equipment" in 2014.
Let's first popularize the background knowledge. The "Three Principles for the Transfer of Defense Equipment" basically stipulate the circumstances under which Japan may export or transfer defense equipment. Previously, Japan could only export components that had been produced under a U.S. patent, but now it appears that they intend to revise the guidelines to allow them to export finished products to the countries where the licensors hold patents.
There are a few key points worth noting. First of all, the new system stipulates that the patent holder country must obtain Japan's consent in advance when transferring ** to a third party, and it cannot be exported to a country or region that is in a state of war. This may seem like a strict rule, but it also leaves a loophole: it allows the delivery of equipment through the United States to countries such as Europe that are not at war. As a result, Japan's equipment export policy is about to usher in a turning point.
Second, this approval of the export of interceptor missiles will set a precedent for the provision of lethal finished equipment. In the past, Japan has also exported finished equipment, such as providing early warning radar to the Philippines, but the radar is not lethal. This time it's different, the "Patriot" missile is really lethal.
The reaction to the news was mixed. Proponents believe that this is a big step forward for Japan in international security cooperation and will help improve Japan's position and influence in international affairs. Opponents fear that this could trigger a regional arms race and even draw Japan into unnecessary conflicts.
Personally, I think there are two sides to this. On the one hand, Japan, as a technologically advanced country, has the ability and responsibility to play a greater role in international security cooperation. The export of the Patriot missiles can be seen as Japan's efforts in this regard. On the other hand, there are real risks. If it is not handled well, it may trigger a series of chain reactions, and may even affect regional stability.
In general, Japan's plan to export Patriot missiles is a double-edged sword. If it is used well, it can play an active role in international security cooperation;If it is not used well, it may cause a series of problems. This requires Japan** and all parties involved to fully weigh the pros and cons and act prudently when making decisions.
In conclusion, I would like to say that international security cooperation has never been a simple business-buying relationship. When it comes to sensitive issues such as exports, it is more necessary for all parties to remain calm and rational and not to be distracted by temporary interests. After all, maintaining world peace and stability is our common goal.
What do you have to say about this event?Everyone is welcome to like, comment and follow.
Note: The illustrations in the article are from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.
Special reminder: It is not easy to be original, this number has been opened for rights protection on the whole network, please do not plagiarize, thank you.