This is a blogger who writes gossip every day, follow me and chat!
It is said that justice is at ease in the hearts of the people, and the eyes of the masses are bright. But why do everyone have opposing views on the same social event, and even tear it up in the comment area?
For example, Zhengzhou Liangliang Lijun and his wife, who have been very popular recently, some people sympathize with them and denounce the developer; Some people say that they are taking the opportunity to hype up and deserve to suffer.
There is also a scandal of fake singing on the cusp, some people think that fake singing is unforgivable, and you have to refund the ticket and pay a fine; But some people think that lip-synching doesn't matter, isn't listening to a concert just to create an atmosphere? Continue**, how to define lip-syncing? How much more than the original singing ratio is lip-syncing? If a singer falset-to-sing because she is unwell, can she be forgiven? The problem is becoming more and more complex.
The movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine" adapted from real events, the protagonist saves people's lives from India's ** generic drugs, and is a living bodhisattva for patients, but it is illegal to sell imported drugs without permission, if you are a judge, how will you judge? Is the protagonist a good guy or a bad guy?
A 35-year-old mother in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, whose child suffered from a rare epilepsy disease, was introduced by a doctor to buy a drug called clobazam, but the drug is a psychotropic drug controlled by the state and is a prohibited drug. In order to save the child's mother, he took risks and defended the law, so if you were a judge, how would he be sentenced?
When we were young, we would always say that this is the good guy and that is the bad guy, as if the world is very simple, clear at a glance, black and white. But the real world is full of contradictions and paradoxes, the good guys and bad guys are not obvious, and even with strict legal rules, it is difficult to make a ruling that satisfies everyone.
Why are there so many controversial cases? Because I recently read Mr. Luo Xiang's new book "The Paradox of Law", I have always liked Mr. Luo, humor is one thing, and more importantly, he speaks boldly. He once denounced the Fengxian case for not protecting people as well as animals, and also raised objections to the case of marriage with the underworld, which was sentenced to seven years, and it was only three years to buy a living person as a wife, which is really unreasonable.
Mr. Luo said frankly that the law "really needs to be adjusted", and he is doing his best to promote the progress of the rule of law in society, and he can see the conscience and perseverance of legal people.
This new book by Mr. Luo Xiang takes controversy and paradox as the starting point, **14 types of classic legal problems, clearly sorts out the eternal paradoxes in the law, and involves a lot of professional legal knowledge, but the language is easy to understand. As a layman in law, I also watch it with relish. If we just look at controversial cases, it will only stay in curiosity, but the real value of this book is that we can learn to analyze events from different perspectives and different positions, improve logical thinking and cognitive ability, and use a higher-dimensional rule of law thinking to resolve conflicts in the future.
Teacher Luo Xiang said frankly that this is his work of spiritual internal friction, because the writing process is very tangled and painful. For readers, this is a feast of thinking, which is more brain-burning than reasoning. From today on, refusing to be a black-and-white diode brings us closer to humanity and to the truth. "The Paradox of Law", recommended for you.
end