"Bright Sword 3" has recently sparked heated discussions because of its idolization of the Anti-Japanese War theme. Although the film is in the historical background of the eight-year Anti-Japanese War, it allows the audience to see the overly trendy and fashionable clothing, living conditions, and even letting the actor live in a villa with a big back, smoke cigars, and drink coffee. This idolization has caused widespread criticism from viewers and experts alike. Everyone generally believes that "Bright Sword 3" should be a historical drama restored through historical facts, rather than a youth idol drama or court drama.
In order to justify the rationality of the film, the director and some of the leading actors of the play issued an article to argue that the lifestyle of the upper class was widespread in the ** period, but this explanation does not conform to historical facts in the soldiers of the Eighth Route Army. This kind of idolization, urbanization, and love of historical dramas misleads young students into thinking that war is a romantic and light-hearted thing similar to a computer game, and ignores the cruelty and bloodshed behind the war. This has also caused many young students to lack a sense of history, so that their understanding of history has become superficial or even wrong, which has caused a certain negative impact on society.
Regarding this incident, the people ** published a commentary emphasizing respect for history. Anti-Japanese war dramas should restore the historical truth, should not fool the audience's IQ, but should be down-to-earth. The War of Resistance was brutal, bloody and tragic, and the audience should know this through historical dramas. The way "Bright Sword 3" is handled not only makes the audience's understanding of history skewed, but also does not respect the audience's IQ and the learning needs of the educated. Therefore, the review calls on the producer to truly respect history, respect the audience, and restore the truth of history.
In addition, the incident has also attracted widespread attention and discussion among netizens. Many netizens expressed anger and dissatisfaction with the handling of "Bright Sword 3", thinking that the show was rubbing off on the popularity of "Bright Sword", but did not really restore history. Some viewers said that they originally had high hopes for "Bright Sword 3" and hoped to learn more about history through the show, but in the end they were disappointed and angry.
It can be seen from this incident that the audience has high requirements for the true restoration of historical dramas. They hope to understand the real history through historical dramas, and not be confused by some hype tricks. The producer should reflect on the expectations of the audience, and cannot blindly cater to the needs of the market and ignore the authenticity of history.
To sum up, the impact of the incident on Bright Sword 3 is negative. The audience was very dissatisfied with the treatment of the idolization of the theme of the Anti-Japanese War in the play, believing that this treatment ignored the authenticity of history and misled young students' historical cognition. The people also commented on the event, emphasizing respect for history. The impact of this incident should make the producer reflect, respecting history and restoring the truth of history is the real responsible approach to the audience.
Now, I would like to ask you what you think about this eventAre you unhappy with the way the show has been handled?Do you agree with the people's ** comments on this incident?You are welcome to join the discussion!