Introduction: Azovstal is facing a new military siege by the Russian army, and its internal predicament is becoming more and more severe. Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Irina Vereshyuk responded to the call, but no real rescue was found. After the humanitarian operation of the Russian army, it turned to a siege rather than an attack, and the bombing caused the internal and external passages to be broken, and survival hung by a thread.
Recently, the Ukrainian-Russian conflict has made waves again, and the Azovstal plant has become the focus of the war. The Russian army's ground-penetrating bombs blew through the bunker, making it difficult to get through inside and outside, and the defenders lived and died.
The development of the plot can be described as confusing. The Azov battalion publicly revealed the tragic situation for the first time, but its call for help was met with a cold reception. Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Iryna Vereshyuk responded, but did not see actual action. The Azovstal plant has undergone drastic changes internally, with many dead and wounded, and desperate resources for survival.
Internal and external difficulties: the remaining defenders are in a hurry.
Vereshchuk told foreign media that more than 1,000 defenders had chosen to surrender before the 10th, and the remaining more than 2,000 Ukrainian troops were stubbornly resisting. Hundreds of people were injured, among whom the seriously injured were in urgent need of surgery, but medical conditions were inadequate, their injuries worsened, and emergency evacuation was urgently needed.
Today, Mariupol is largely controlled by Russia, and the Azovstal plant is under siege and has serious internal attrition. But the defenders did not retreat without a fight, but struggled to support themselves in the choice of life and death. The fundamental problem of the dilemma lies in the siege of the steel plant by the Russian army.
Dilemma: the Russian army besieges but does not attack, and the defenders are blocked inside and outside.
After the humanitarian operation, the Russian army turned to a siege but not an attack, pressing on the remnants of the Ukrainian army. According to the news, the Russian army used bombers and missiles to bomb the steel plant, and the ground infrastructure was completely destroyed. The commander of the Azov battalion revealed that the underground tunnel collapsed, the network line of internal and external communication was interrupted, and the Russian army's underground bunker tactics led to a large number of personnel**.
Iron and steel mills have been cut off from their main exports, losing contact with the outside world, and there is a serious shortage of survival resources. The defenders in distress are like in a Jedi dilemma, and if they insist on not surrendering, they will die of starvation. The Russian army is waiting for victory, putting enormous pressure on the Azovstal plant.
Life and death are staggered: evacuation becomes the only option.
Reality shows that the defenders of Azovstal are in a life-and-death situation. The Russian army's strategy of encircling but not attacking has led to a sharp reduction in internal resources and an increase in the mortality rate of the wounded. The shortage of materials not only affected the wounded, but also affected the food and clothing of the entire steel plant. In order to survive, some of the defenders tried to break through the encirclement, but in vain under the heavy deployment of Russian troops, which became another factor in the reduction of personnel.
The Road to Survival: Rescue is still the most desired.
The current situation at the Azovstal plant is deeply worrying, and the defenders are desperately resisting in a difficult situation. However, the only way to survive now seems to be through evacuation. In the face of the tight encirclement and offensive of the Russian army, the defenders' hope for survival is gradually drifting away.
Behind this war is the fate of countless families. The families of the fighters of the internal Azov battalion called for help, but were met with indifference. Vereshchuk's statement appeared relatively calm, and there was no substantive rescue operation. The fate of the Azovstal plant hangs in the balance, and the road to rescue is becoming more and more difficult.
Summary: On the line of life and death, the fate of the Azovstal plant is uncertain.
The plight of the Azovstal steel plant highlights the brutality of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. The Russian army's tactics of encircling but not attacking, and the means of underground bombing, made the living space of the defenders increasingly narrow. Evacuation became the only option, but it faced many difficulties. The fate of the Azovstal plant is uncertain, and the defenders are on the line of life and death, and more attention and rescue are needed.
Through this fierce war, we have seen the cruelty of war and the fragility of life. The fate of Azovstal may be just a microcosm of the many tragedies of the conflict, and we need to expect more peaceful efforts and voices for the end of this war.
The current conflict between Ukraine and Russia has attracted great attention from the international community, and the plight of the Azovstal steel plant has made people deeply aware of the cruelty of this war. The scenes described in the article are heart-wrenching and make one think about the enormous impact of war on the lives of ordinary people.
First of all, the plight faced by the defenders of the Azovstal plant highlights the suffering of ordinary people in the conflict. They put up a tough resistance under siege, not only facing the enemy's offensive, but also dealing with a lack of internal and external resources and the death of the wounded. This makes people reflect on the fact that war is often the most innocent victim of innocent people, and that people living in the midst of war suffer a lot.
Secondly, the article mentions the tactics adopted by the Russian army to besiege but not attack, and through bombardment, the internal and external passages were broken, leaving the defenders in a more isolated and helpless situation. This callous tactic not only increased the distress of the defenders, but also posed a direct threat to the survival of ordinary people. The use of this military means has provoked strong indignation in the international community, as it has ruthlessly destroyed the hopes and futures of people living in conflict zones.
In addition, the incidents of family members calling for help but being given a cold reception in the article raise questions about the response to the conflict. In the midst of war, in addition to promoting military action, we should pay more attention to and protect the living needs of ordinary people. Whether it is medical resources or food supplies, they should be reasonably distributed to protect people's basic rights and interests. **The responsibility in war is not only to fight for territory, but also to ensure the safety of people's lives and basic well-being.
Finally, the article's call for attention and rescue of the Azovstal plant is actually a reminder of the moral responsibility of the international community. In this era of globalization, countries should share responsibility for global peace and resolve disputes through cooperation and negotiation, rather than through war and conflict. It is only by working together that the international community will be able to create a more peaceful, stable and prosperous world.
In summary, the plight of the Azovstal plant reflects the brutality of the war and the immense suffering faced by innocent people. The international community should pay attention to this issue and call on all parties to resolve disputes through dialogue and negotiation and create a better living environment for people in war-torn areas. Only in this way will we be able to achieve lasting peace by working together.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!