In 499 B.C., Confucius, the great secretary of the Lu State, ruled for only seven days and ordered the execution of the powerful minister Shao Zhengmao, causing an uproar. This period of history was recorded in the history books of Sima Qian's "Historical Records: The Family of Confucius", and became a scene of the collision between Confucianism and Legalism. Confucius, the founder of Confucianism, is regarded as the "Most Holy Teacher of Dacheng", but his decision raises doubts about the side of this great thinker.
Shao Zhengmao, Lu "heard people", the power leaned towards the government and the opposition, and was as famous as Confucius, and even overpowered Confucius for a time. At the time of the development of Confucianism, his influence should not be underestimated. However, after Confucius took power, he was beheaded in the name of "the punishment of the gentleman", and his body was exposed to the sun for three days, and the whole country of Lu was in an uproar.
"On Heng and Jiaorui" reveals the situation at that time: "Shao Zhengmao was in Lu and Confucius. The gate of Confucius, three surplus and three void, only Yan Yuan does not go. The door people go to Confucius and return to the young Zhengmao. This period of history reveals the bitterness of the dispersion of the disciples of Confucius, and the ideas of Shao Zhengmao attracted Confucius's disciples, and Yan Yuan was the only exception left.
Confucius's list of Shaozheng Mao crimes includes "being brave and dangerous", "being firm in action", "arguing with falsehood", "remembering ugliness and being broad", and "being obedient and unreasonable", accusing him of being well-versed in the past and the present but having a sinister heart, resolutely violating Zhou etiquette, being good at verbal argumentation, using strong words, and spreading unorthodox ideas. This led to the decision of the "gentleman's punishment".
However, there are different evaluations of Confucius's decision. In "Xunzi", the defense of Confucius is that he did not deliberately want to kill Shao Zhengmao, but "if he misses it, he will kill it below", and he has to take action under the pressure of the situation. Confucianism believes that Confucius acted to uphold orthodoxy, but some people believe that this is a rare stain on Confucius.
During the Spring and Autumn Period, Confucianism and Legalism clashed fiercely. Confucius's ideas of etiquette were challenged by Legalism. The reign of Confucius coincided with the collapse of etiquette and music in the Spring and Autumn Period, when princes competed for hegemony and Legalist ideas spread rapidly. In order to curb the power of the Legalists, Confucius adopted heavy-handed measures to eliminate dissidents and consolidate the orthodox position of Confucianism.
However, from today's perspective, both Confucianism and Legalism have merit, and the governance of the country should listen to a diversity of voices. The reason why Confucius took such an action was not only due to his personal selfishness, but also due to differences in schools of thought. Shao Zhengmao followed Legalism and advocated rules and laws, which formed a strong opposition to Confucius's Confucianism and became an intolerable heresy.
As the times have evolved, so have the interpretations of this period of history. Both Confucianism and Legalism have left a rich intellectual legacy in Chinese history. As a great thinker, Confucius's achievements cannot be erased by momentary decisions. However, this history still makes people reflect on the struggle between power and ideas, and how to balance the voices of different schools of thought and achieve more inclusive governance in complex societies.
The above in-depth analysis of the power and ideological struggle between Confucius and Shao Zhengmao is thought-provoking. This history reflects the fierce collision between the two major schools of thought of Confucianism and Legalism during the Spring and Autumn Period, as well as the tactics of Confucius as a ruler. We can comment on this from different angles.
First, about Confucius's decision. As the founder of Confucianism, Confucius's ideas had a profound impact on Chinese culture. However, his decision on power was highly controversial. Whether the killing of Shao Zhengmao was to defend orthodoxy or out of personal selfishness is a question worth pondering. On the one hand, it is understandable that Confucius was obsessed with Confucianism, and he may have considered the elimination of dissent as a necessary means to maintain social order. But on the other hand, it has also sparked criticism of the abuse of power and the purge of heretics. In history, every great thinker has his or her human limitations, and Confucius is no exception.
Secondly, the controversy over Confucianism. During the Spring and Autumn Period, Chinese society was in a turbulent period of change, and various ideas emerged, among which the dispute between Confucianism and Law was the most intense. Confucianism represented by Confucius emphasizes the education of etiquette and music, and pays attention to self-cultivation, governing the country and leveling the worldLegalism, on the other hand, emphasizes the rule of law and pursues strict laws and systems. This ideological struggle is not only embodied in theory, but also in practical politics and has evolved into a struggle of power and conspiracy. Confucius's assertion of Confucian legitimacy by purging dissidents can be seen as a compromise between power and ideology at the time.
Third, reflection on history. As the times change, we look more objectively at historical figures and their decisions, and realize that every thinker is a product of the times. Confucius's decision to kill Shao Zhengmao cannot simply be regarded as a binary opposition of right and wrong, good and evil, but should be understood as a product of the specific historical background of the time. This kind of reflection enables us to be more objective to history and understand the limitations and complexities of historical figures.
Finally, think about the balance between power and thought. In a complex and ever-changing society, the struggle between power and ideology occurs from time to time. How to maintain ideological orthodoxy while maintaining inclusiveness and fairness has become an urgent issue to be solved. Although power schemes have their inevitability, they should also be constrained by morality and the rule of law, so as to avoid abuse of power and eliminate the evils of dissent. The controversy over Confucianism and law provides us with a revelation that in governance, we must pay attention to balancing various forces and achieving pluralistic coexistence in order to promote social progress.
In general, the controversy between Confucius and Shao Zhengmao is not only the epitome of the fierce collision of ideas at that time, but also the fusion of power and ideology in the historical development. In-depth reflection on this period of history not only helps us understand the complexity of the development of ancient Chinese thought, but also helps us to better balance power and ideas in today's society and promote social progress.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!