With electric vehicles as the future for a long time, the ultimate form of new energy vehicles has become a broad consensus, between fuel vehicles and electric vehicles, which form of automotive products can become a better way to transition, has become a point of discussion. In the past few years, whether it is on the Internet or offline, this kind of discussion seems to have not stopped, and one of the key points of the discussion is actually the miserable loss of fuel consumption of plug-in hybrid and extended-range electric vehicles.
Until today, the problem of relatively high fuel consumption of plug-in hybrid and extended range electric vehicles is still a topic that people are talking about, which is why some plug-in hybrid models have been tested for fuel consumption, which can attract the attention of the whole network.
Therefore, some small partners or Japanese brand manufacturers have put forward a new point of view, that is, Japanese gasoline-electric hybrid is a better way to make the transition. Because these Japanese hybrid models not only have very low fuel consumption, but also have strong system reliability, there is no need to worry about large maintenance costs after a few years of power battery attenuation or damage. Of course, there is no problem with such a statement, but at the market level, the situation is completely different.
From the market level, the current fuel vehicles and electric vehicles are basically plug-in hybrids and extended-range electric vehicles, and the gasoline-electric hybrids of Japanese brands may not be sold together with the fuel version of the model, let alone compared with these domestic plug-in hybrid and extended range models. It can be said that in the face of domestic plug-in hybrid and extended-range electric vehicles, the gasoline-electric hybrid models of Japanese brands are powerless and vulnerable.
In fact, this is a question of logic, the hybrid models of Japanese brands are indeed fuel-efficient, and the fuel consumption of general models is not uncommon to drive to 4-5L, but the problem is that these models have to burn fuel in almost all working conditions or scenarios, and do not have the ability to drive purely electrically.
These plug-in hybrid or extended-range electric vehicles can reduce the cost of use through pure electric driving when commuting or driving for short distances. It's a very good account. For example, running 1000 kilometers a month, 800 kilometers of urban commuting, 200 kilometers of high-speed, the oil price is calculated at 8 yuan L, and the Japanese petrol-electric hybrid model can press the average fuel consumption to a low level of 4L, so 1000 kilometers will need 40L of oil, and the cost is 320 yuan.
However, these plug-in mixes commute in urban areas, that is, commuting, basically pure electric driving, fast charging, slow charging combined to charge, the cost of one kilometer will not exceed 015 yuan, then 800 kilometers, is 120 yuan, the remaining 200 kilometers, even if it is a loss of electricity and fuel consumption, 100 kilometers of 8L fuel consumption, it is 16L oil, 1000 kilometers of cost is only 248 yuan, than the cost of Toyota gasoline-electric hybrid is still lower. Moreover, most plug-in hybrid and extended-range electric vehicle owners will be fully charged before running long distances, and even on the road, they will make up a little more power, so the overall cost can be lower.
So in fact, compared with Japanese brand hybrid models, the advantage of domestic plug-in hybrid and extended range electric vehicles is that they have more choice, that is, if the owner feels that the fuel price is a bit high, then it can increase the pure electric mileage and reduce the cost through frequent charging, but this is difficult to achieve in Japanese hybrids.
And an important point is that plug-in hybrid and extended-range electric vehicles are very easy to do with performance, such as the BYD Tang DM-P's 100 kilometers of acceleration can run to 4In 3 seconds, the ideal L9 is a large SUV model, and the acceleration of 100 kilometers can also run to 53 seconds level, so the overall performance, compared with fuel vehicles, is a qualitative leap.
However, many Japanese brand hybrid vehicles sacrifice performance in order to pursue extremely low fuel consumption. We have driven some Japanese gasoline-electric hybrid models, and in terms of performance, they are not even as strong as the pure fuel version, so many models are just to save fuel for the sake of fuel, sacrificing too much in terms of performance.
Therefore, when domestic plug-in hybrid and extended-range electric vehicles have more choice, that is, they can save more money and have relatively stronger performance potential, Japanese mature and fuel-efficient gasoline-electric hybrid models will not have much competitiveness. Moreover, many Japanese hybrid vehicles, compared with fuel vehicles, are higher, and these domestic plug-in hybrid models and extended range electric models, under the involution, the ** has become lower and lower, in such a comparison, Japanese gasoline-electric hybrid will naturally fall behind.