Regarding the "Winter Test Incident", I don't fully agree with Yu Dazui, and I don't believe that I understand Che Di, and adults must learn to think independently.
1. Is it meaningful to test the extreme cold limit of minus 40 degrees?
It definitely makes sense. About 300 million people in Northern Europe, Russia, Northeast China and half of North America will experience an extremely cold climate of minus 40 degrees. At the same time, it is necessary to do extreme testing, because the car is a means of transportation, and people hope that it will save lives in times of crisis.
Second, what is the purpose of understanding the Chedi winter test?
Financial data is most intuitive if it can be made public, but this is not possible. Do you still remember the public debate between Lao Luo and Wang Ziru?The roles of both sides are the same as today, and if you haven't seen it, you can understand it.
Did you find that almost all of the top players in this test are domestic cars, and international brands are all countdowns, and I really think that domestic cars are leading the world when I look at this list, and car users all over the world do not understand cars.
The Model Y, which is the No. 1 seller in the extremely cold Nordics, is actually at the bottom, don't Nordic car consumers compare?Everyone knows that Tesla is recognized as not false and does not advertise.
The top of the list is actually a car with a lithium iron phosphate batteryAs we all know, all car manufacturers generally use ternary lithium for high-end models and lithium iron phosphate for low-end models. Now this result is like a thousand-yuan machine directly overturning the Apple mobile phone, completely ignoring the basic scientific principles!
In short, the review agency will try its best to force you to recharge!
3. Is the same test standard necessarily fair?
As a well-known car, the test should be objective, fair and transparent, and when the public questions and concerns, it should come up with strong evidence, which is responsible for its own profession.
If the test standard is indeed implemented exactly the same during the operation, then you can prove your innocence by simply taking out the entire test** and data logging. Or, according to the same test conditions, randomly select a few cars and test them again to see if the results are similar.
At the very least, any reviewer should be open and transparent about testing, and when everyone is questioning, it's a sign that you're full of loopholes.
If you recharge more than **, you can sell it, so who still cares about making products?If the social value of ** turns from positive to negative, it will soon be spurned by the public. Speaking of which, I remembered the previous evaluation of the first brother Wang Ziru, it seems that there are a lot of people who want to be Wang Ziru.
Finally, who do you think will be the "top three winter pure electric SUV range" with the highest gold content?The one with the highest price will be announced in half a month, and you can increase the price of the car to buy it!
100 help plan