At present, the international situation is changing, and the "main theme" of 2021 is becoming more and more significant under the "big epidemic" and "big changes". On November 27, there were two major incidents in China's neighborhood, one expected and the other unexpected.
First, let's look at the "expected" things. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida made a remark about his ambitions as he reviewed the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force's Asaka station. At the review ceremony, Fumio Kishida said that he would not rule out the "ability to attack enemy bases" to stop ballistic missiles in other countries. This means that Japan's Self-Defense Forces may strengthen their defense forces and even destroy missiles aimed at Japan, which has aroused international concern and concern.
As a defeated country in World War II, Japan is not allowed to have its own army, and the existing "Self-Defense Forces" can only maintain limited self-defense forces. Fumio Kishida's statement challenged the international "red line" and was worrying.
Fumio Kishida's statement means that Japan may use its armed forces to destroy military bases within the borders of other countries. This has raised fears that Japan will return to a "real army," an unacceptable threat to East Asian countries. In response to this matter, we can briefly ** from three aspects.
First of all, Japan has repeatedly tested the bottom line and tried to make the Self-Defense Forces an army. Japan's "aircraft carrier-like" transformation of the "Izumo-class" destroyers shows a trend of gradual "normalization of the armed forces," which is alarming. We must prepare for the worst in the face of countries that have always denied the history of World War II.
Secondly, Fumio Kishida's statement is actually a kind of "vote of nomination" to make a position clear to the United States. Considering the existence of US troops stationed in Japan, if Japan dares to test the "red line," it will certainly be approved by the United States. Kishida's statement or the request of the US side shows that Japan is currying favor with the United States.
Third, Japan's increasingly assertive stance is closely related to the "revision of the Peace Constitution." In the Japanese Diet, the revision of the Peace Constitution has become the mainstream voice. Kishida** is likely to push for the success of revising the Peace Constitution during his tenure. Previous moves by Japan's Self-Defense Forces may have been engaged in "psychological warfare" in an attempt to reduce resistance to amending the Peace Constitution.
Next, let's look at the "unexpected" second thing, the Russian Arsenal**. ** accident occurred at an arsenal in the city of Dzerzhinsk, which burned an area of more than 900 square meters. Two workers have been injured in the accident.
This is not the first ** fire accident related to military strategic materiel in Russia this year. In October of this year, a gunpowder factory** in the Ryazan region killed 16 people and seriously injured one. A later investigation found that the accidents involved "violations of safety regulations".
Considering the extremely high risk nature of these production operations involving military strategic materials, it would be almost impossible to occur if it were not for production problems**. However, there is also the possibility of malfunction and vandalism of machinery and facilities. Therefore, it is necessary for Russia to be alert to all possibilities.
At present, relations between Russia and Europe continue to be tense, and Western countries are "holding on" with Russia. At this critical juncture, it is not impossible to create "small stumbling blocks". Russia must be vigilant against external infiltration and pressure in order to maintain ***
These events have sparked widespread concern and concern about East Asian geopolitics and Russia's security. In the face of these challenges, the international community needs to respond more cooperatively and cautiously.
The above article touches on the geopolitical situation in East Asia and the incident at the Russian Arsenal**, which has triggered a lot of thinking about the future direction. First, Fumio Kishida's statement raised concerns in the international community about Japan's intentions. Japan's military activities have been curtailed as a defeated country in World War II, and Kishida's comments have raised concerns about its ambitions and threats to regional stability. The article points out Japan's efforts to promote the "normalization of the military" of the Self-Defense Forces, and this change not only affects Japan's domestic politics, but also affects the security and stability of the entire East Asian region.
Secondly, the incident at the Russian arsenal** exposed security risks in the process of military production. This is not only a problem for Russia, but also a reminder of the importance that countries around the world attach to the security of military industrial production. When dealing with such high-risk production processes, safety regulations and strict measures are crucial. The incident calls on countries to review their own military safety and take stricter measures to ensure the safety of workers and the public.
Although the article describes two events in detail, it still leaves some room to be desired. For example, the inferences about Fumio Kishida's statement may be biased towards subjective speculation and may not be in line with reality. At the same time, in the Russian Arsenal incident, although the article mentions the importance of safety regulations, it does not go into the specific reasons behind the accident, which is also a topic worth going deeper.
On the whole, while this article puts forward a point of view, there is still room for deeper issues. A more in-depth investigation and analysis of Japan's political trends and military security issues can provide readers with more comprehensive information and more valuable perspectives.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!