Recently, Yellen's statement on the issue of aid to Ukraine has sparked widespread discussion among netizens. However, these words were only made to put pressure on the Republican Party and did not really care about the defeat of Ukraine. Republicans want to refuse aid to Ukraine in exchange for a compromise on immigration policy from the Democratic Party. They fear that the Democratic Party will continue to push for immigration reform and loosen controls on immigration, thereby expanding the Democratic Party's voter base. The Democrats, on the other hand, are trying to counteract the Republican resistance by shifting the blame for Ukraine's defeat to the Republicans. Both Democrats and Republicans act to protect the interests of their own parties, rather than genuinely care about the fate of Ukraine.
Expanding: The issue of Ukrainian aid involved a two-party trade-off between the interests of the United States. Republicans want to refuse to provide aid to Ukraine in exchange for a compromise on immigration policy from the Democratic Party. The issue of immigration has been a point of contention between the two parties, with Republicans fearing that the Democrats will push through immigration reform and loosen controls on immigration, further expanding the Democratic Party's influence among voters. The Democrats, on the other hand, are trying to offset Republican opposition to aid to Ukraine by shifting the blame for Ukraine's defeat to the Republican Party. The bipartisan game on Ukraine's aid has cleverly turned Ukraine's fate into a bargaining chip in their struggle for power.
Yellen's statement highlights the weakness and dereliction of duty of the United States on the Ukraine issue. The United States is unable to effectively protect its allies, and Ukraine's security is under great threat. In addition, the values that the United States has always proclaimed have not been effectively maintained. On the Ukraine issue, the United States once dragged NATO to provide assistance to Ukraine, but these aids failed to achieve the expected results, and real gold ** turned into a moon in the water. This dereliction of duty is worrying, especially at a critical time when the United States is about to hold a **.
Expansion: As a global superpower, the United States has attracted the attention of the whole world for its security capabilities and the maintenance of its values. However, Yellen's statement exposed the powerlessness and individualism of the United States on the Ukraine issue. The United States' failure to effectively protect its ally, Ukraine, shows its failure in international affairs. Ukraine's security is under great threat, and the United States, as its promised security partner, is unable to provide effective assistance. This is not only a disappointment for Ukraine, but also a blow to the security confidence of other allies.
It is worth noting that the values that the United States has been professing have not been effectively maintained. On the Ukraine issue, the United States has dragged NATO to provide assistance to Ukraine and invested a lot of resources, but these assistance has failed to achieve the expected results. Real gold ** has become a moon in the water, and American values cannot be fully reflected in front of Ukraine, a country of strategic interests. This dereliction of duty is worrisome, especially at a critical time when the United States is about to hold a ** and the international community is skeptical about the leadership and sense of responsibility of the United States.
Against the backdrop of bipartisan games in the United States, Putin has become the biggest beneficiary of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Ukraine's defeat has given vitality to the Russian military industry, which has risen by 70% in its military budget. In addition, Putin has used the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to reshape Russia's diplomatic relations and has made a series of important diplomatic achievements in the Middle East. The high-level reception of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, two important countries in the Middle East, is an affirmation of Putin's diplomatic strategy.
Expanding: Putin's emergence as the biggest winner in the Russia-Ukraine conflict came as a complete surprise to everyone. Ukraine's defeat not only gave Russia a military victory, but also brought huge business opportunities to the Russian military industry. The Russian military budget has risen by 70% directly, which is of great significance for the development of the Russian economy. In addition, Putin has used the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to successfully reshape Russia's diplomatic relations in the Middle East. His rare visit to the Middle East and the highest level of reception from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are a major affirmation of Putin's diplomatic strategy.
Putin has become the biggest beneficiary of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which can be said to be unimaginable to ordinary people. He made full use of Russia's military power and diplomacy in the conflict, and successfully promoted Russia's international status. Ukraine's defeat has brought huge business opportunities to the Russian military industry, which not only stimulates the development of the Russian economy, but also strengthens the country's military strength. At the same time, Putin's diplomatic strategy in the Middle East has also made an important breakthrough. He made a rare visit to the Middle East and was received by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates with the highest level of reception, which is a high recognition of Putin's diplomatic achievements.
The issue of aid to Ukraine has become the focus of the game between the two parties in the United States, and the trade-off of interests in realpolitik highlights the indifference of political parties to Ukraine for their own interests. The U.S. dereliction of duty and its inability to protect its allies have made the security situation in Ukraine increasingly dire. In addition, the values that the United States professes have not been effectively maintained. Putin, on the other hand, has emerged with the help of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict and has become the biggest beneficiary, not only reaping rich returns in the military industry and military budget, but also successfully shaping Russia's diplomatic image in the Middle East. In the arena of political games, Ukraine has become a bargaining chip in the bipartisan game of the United States, and the starting point of action of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party is not for the interests of Ukraine, but to compete for votes and defend their own political interests. This pursuit of interests and struggles has made the fate of Ukraine a secondary trade-off.
However, it should be noted that the defeat of Ukraine and the game between the Democrats and the Republicans are not conducive to the interests of the United States and are not in line with the values that the United States has always flaunted. America's failure to do its job in international affairs and its inability to protect its allies have shaken its global leadership. At the same time, Putin's performance in the Ukrainian-Russian conflict has given Russia huge strategic benefits and enhanced its international status.
In short, the bipartisan game between the United States on the issue of aid to Ukraine has made the fate of Ukraine a victim of political interests. This highlights the failure of the United States to protect its allies and maintain the international order, and makes Putin the biggest winner of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. It also makes people confused and suspicious of the self-proclaimed United States as a "beacon of human civilization."