America s China Anxiety The strategic puzzle of the Biden era

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-28

After Biden took office, the criticism of China in the United States gradually escalated, as if China had surpassed the United States. However, is there a deeper anxiety behind this demonization?This article will delve into the U.S. military strategy, geopolitics, and its implications for Europe against China.

U.S. Africa Command Commander Stephen Townsend recently issued a warning claiming that the threat from China is expanding, involving both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Behind this kind of rhetoric, is there really a sign that China has surpassed the United States in an all-round way, or is it due to the strategic mentality of the United States?

In the eyes of the United States, the Pacific Ocean seems to have become its inland sea, and in order to firmly control China, the United States has established a military system based on the three island chains. Can this hegemonic mentality really effectively curb China's rise?The military hegemony of the United States may no longer be able to overwhelm China militarily, and this discomfort makes the United States anxious.

In the past, the United States mainly faced the USSR militarily, but after the collapse of the USSR, the United States had no real opponents. Today, however, China has become a challenger that the United States cannot afford to take lightly. Looking back at the incident of the US bombing of the Chinese Embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 years ago, we now find that China is no longer an object that can be bullied at will.

The United States has tried to flex its muscles in front of China, and from time to time it has approached the East and South China Seas, but it has also declared in a high-sounding manner that it does not seek a military conflict with China. This is because the United States does not have an advantage in military power on China's home turf. This strategic balance has left both sides in an awkward state of stalemate.

At the same time, the United States is trying to turn NATO into a tool against China by reshaping it. However, the Atlantic Ocean and China are so far apart that they have little to do with each other that the threat of a U.S. commander seems far-fetched. European countries, while wanting to become militarily independent, still need to seek protection from the United States, which gives the United States the opportunity to exert geopolitical influence.

Recently, EU defense ministers approved a resolution inviting the United States and Canada to join the EU military mobility program, which marks a geopolitical realignment in Europe. However, is the US joining really for the sake of European security, or is it more out of self-interest?This has also put Europe in a passive position.

In the long run, the US membership may weaken the EU's autonomy, but for a variety of reasons, Europe can still only choose the option of "consent". In this geopolitical game, how each party will balance its own interests has become a focus of attention.

At this challenging and uncertain moment, the United States has to re-examine its strategic position and take seriously the military and geopolitical challenges brought about by China's rise. The U.S.-China relationship in the Biden era is destined to be full of unknowns, and how the two sides find a balance in this game will directly affect the global geopolitical landscape.

The above article reveals the complexities and strategic dilemmas of the U.S.-China relationship in the Biden era, as well as the game in the geopolitical arena. First, the article mentions the demonization of China by the United States, focusing on the attempt of the United States to build a military system in the Pacific region, trying to fix China in a certain region through a three-island chain. This strategy illustrates the nervousness and discomfort of the United States in the face of China's rise, despite its military dominance in the past.

Secondly, the article talks about the theory of the US threat to China in the Atlantic, pointing out that this statement lacks geographical common sense. Under this logic, the United States is trying to counter China by strengthening NATO, however, the distance between the Atlantic and China makes this threat seem far-fetched. This reflects an exaggerated approach by the United States in seeking the support of its allies, trying to dominate geopolitics.

Thirdly, the article emphasizes the passive situation of European countries, especially in the case of the US joining the EU military mobility program. European countries want to be militarily independent, but still need the protection of the United States. The U.S. accession, perhaps for its own sake, puts Europe in a relatively passive position in the geopolitical game. This situation calls on European countries to be more cautious in their relations with the United States in order to safeguard their own interests.

Overall, the article provides a profound analysis of the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship in the Biden era, as well as the challenges of the United States in the geopolitical arena. With the changes in the world pattern, the relationship between countries has become more and more complex, requiring more rational and pragmatic thinking and action. The Biden-era U.S.-China relationship will be a focal point on the international stage, and the two sides will need to work together to find a balance between cooperation and competition to promote global stability and prosperity.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages