The cancellation of e-commerce triggers thinking, how to save the real economy?
Cancel e-commerce to save the real economy?In fact, the attitude of the top management has been very clear!
A few days ago, Pinduoduo's ** value surpassed Ali's Ali on the domestic Internet, which caused heated discussions on the domestic Internet, and in this context, there was a big discussion on the Internet about whether to cancel e-commerce. Some netizens believe that e-commerce has exacerbated the involution of the market, and even destroyed the real economy, and in order to save the real economy, e-commerce must be canceled, so that the economy can recover quickly and employment opportunities will increase.
Will eliminating e-commerce save the real economy?I don't know what you think, but I don't think there's a causal relationship between the two.
First of all, e-commerce relies on the real economy: clothing, accessories, toys, mobile phones, computers, etc. on the e-commerce platform, which are not produced by physical factories?It is undeniable that the existence of e-commerce has reduced the profit margin of enterprises, because the goods are more transparent, and the market competition will naturally be more intense. But we must not forget that e-commerce has also brought more opportunities to the real economy!
For example, through the e-commerce platform, a product in the Yiwu factory in Zhejiang can be seen by consumers in Guangdong, Northeast, Xinjiang and other regionsFrom this perspective, e-commerce may seem like a reduction in the profits of a business, but in fact, it also provides a business with more sales channels and a larger audience!
Do you still think that e-commerce has destroyed the real economy?Of course, it is undeniable that e-commerce has had an impact on part of the real economy, that is, offline retail stores (such as Main Street and Garment City), because under the impact of e-commerce, the business volume of the real economy has shrunk significantly over the years.
I don't think that's a reason to do away with e-commerce, though!Dialectically, e-commerce only provides consumers with a new shopping channel and makes their choices more diverse, so what's wrong with that?Secondly, we can also look back and see, in the era of no e-commerce, pedestrian streets, clothing cities, how to attract consumers?I still have a deep impression that when e-commerce is not popular, when I go to the clothing city to buy clothes, the vendors ask for a price, the price of a piece of clothing is 30, and some traders may even ask for 150
In my opinion, the real impact of e-commerce, that is, physical merchants and bosses, and the reason why these people oppose e-commerce is not because of how much enthusiasm they have, but because the emergence of e-commerce has affected their interests, and they can't change this status quo, so they want to put pressure on the country through ** pressure, and even under the banner of seeking benefits for the real economy, so that the country can put an end to the e-commerce industry.
But will the state really put an end to e-commerce?Apparently not!In fact, the attitude of the top management is already very clear!Not long ago, as one of the major provinces at the forefront of reform, Guangdong issued a clear warning: it will encourage the development of e-commerce in Guangdong and support Shenzhen and Guangzhou to build e-commerce capitals. Even Guangdong, one of the key provinces for reform, has made it clear that it will vigorously develop e-commerce, but now we have always believed that the state should close down e-commerce
Generally speaking, shutting down e-commerce to save the real economy is nonsense in itself, and the state will never be able to restrict the development of e-commerce, whether we accept it or not, e-commerce will exist.
And for those enterprises affected by traditional e-commerce, what I want to say is: instead of complaining about the impact of e-commerce on enterprises, it is better to think about their own problems, the concept of enterprises has not changed for so many years, or rather,"Wronged"Isn't it always the consumer?