Ukraine, after the defeat of Russia, is in a double dilemma both internally and externally. External assistance has been greatly reduced, and the Ukrainian side can only rely on itself to build fortifications and enter the defensive stage. Internally, Ukraine is facing serious recruitment difficulties and low morale, and front-line operations have always been passive and difficult to resistRussian armyof the offensive. In addition, the infighting between Ukraine and the military is becoming more and more obvious, and Ukraine Zelensky and the Ukrainian armyCommander-in-ChiefThe contradictions between Zaluzhny have become public.
Originally, Ukraine tried to hide the truth, but with the passage of time, the differences between the two could no longer be concealed. To this, whiteRussia**LukashenkoIn an interview, he stressed that he had long foreseen the differences between Ukraine and the military, and he mentioned in his statement half a year ago that the Ukrainian army would become Zelensky's biggest opposition. However, few people believed this at the time. At that time, Ukraine was still in the initial stage of the first stage, its morale was high, it received a lot of equipment support from the West, and many Ukrainian soldiers were also trained by Western countries. Before the Ukrainian army suffered a major defeat, no one seemed to expect infighting. However, the hidden danger has long been buried, and this hidden danger is precisely the inconsistency of the strategic thinking of the two sides.
Zelensky ** with ZaluzhnyCommander-in-ChiefThere are many differences. Zaluzhny is more familiar with Soviet-style tactics than with Western NATO operations. On the contrary, Zelensky believes that NATO's tactics will solve everything. However, when the Ukrainian army launched a large-scale offensive, it was takenRussian armyWhen the war is losing and the losses are heavy, Western tactics have proven to be unworkable on the battlefield in Ukraine. Subsequently, the Ukrainian army returned to its previous mode of operation. However, new divisions followed, with Zaluzhny leaning towards NATO's line of thinking, advocating a concentrated push in southern Ukraine rather than concentrating most of his forces in the east. However, Zelensky's insistence on "dividing the troops into two paths" has attracted criticism from NATO and has also laid a hidden danger for the failure. When the Ukrainian army's ** was almost completely defeated, a new disagreement arose between the two. Zaluzhny hopes to preserve his strength and prepare for next year, but Zelensky insists that the Ukrainian army fight in the Avdiivka regionRussian armyattrition, which is not allowed to withdraw the Ukrainian army beforeMutter's decisions are similar, they are motivated by political considerations, not by political considerationsMilitaryNeed.
From these disagreements, it can be seen that Zaluzhny as a Ukrainian armyCommander-in-Chief, his choices are often better able to serve the interests of the Ukrainian army. And judging by opinion polls in Ukraine, the people's trust in Zaluzhny far exceeds their trust in Zelensky. However, Ukraine had to accept ** led by a layman. At the moment, there is more and more talk about Zaluzhny replacing Zelensky, to which Zelensky has also responded, claiming that those who command the battle should not always think about politics. However, in reality, it is not the people who command the battles who want to enter politics, but the people who are full of political thinking constantly interfere in the actions of the army, otherwise Ukraine would not have suffered such a painful defeat.
The differences between Ukraine and the military are made up of differencesStrategic thinkingcaused. Zelensky believes that Western NATO will be the key to solving the difficult problems of the Ukrainian army, and he hopes to use Western aid and technical support to build Ukraine's army into a modern force to resist Russian aggression. However, ZaluzhnyCommander-in-ChiefMore inclined to the tactics of the Soviet era, he was convinced that Soviet-style methods of warfare were more applicable to Ukraine. This strategic divergence has led to inconsistencies in the decision-making of Ukraine** and the military, which in turn has affected UkraineMilitaryLet's go.
in UkraineMilitaryDuring the operation, the differences between the ** and the military manifested themselves in a number of ways. First of all, Zaluzhny stressed the need to maintain strength and prepare reserves of forces to prepare for the future. On the contrary, Zelensky is more concerned about the current situation, and he hopes that the Ukrainian army will be able to meet in the Avdiivka regionRussian armyWage a war of attrition to weaken your enemies. This divergence in tactical choices led to confusion and defeat in the tactics of the Ukrainian army.
In addition, the differences between the Ukrainian and military forces on the deployment of troops are also one of the important reasons for the conflict. Zaluzhny tends to concentrate his forces in southern Ukraine, which allows for the formation of a powerful decapitation force capable of quickly counterattacking. However, Zelensky insisted on dispersing forces in multiple directions in order to distract the enemy's attention and forces and create more opportunities for the Ukrainian army. Due to the long-term scattered operations, the strength of the Ukrainian army has been further weakened and it is unable to effectively respond to the Russian offensive.
The differences between Ukraine and the military are also reflected in the choice of equipment. ** More inclined to buy modern equipment from Western countries, solving combat problems with the help of advanced technology and firepower superiority. The military, on the other hand, relies more on old equipment from the Soviet era, believing that it is more adapted to Ukraine's operational environment. The difference in equipment selection between the two sides has led to the problem of mismatch in the equipment of the Ukrainian army, which limits the combat capability of the Ukrainian army.
In conclusion, the disagreements between Ukraine and the military have exacerbated the complexity of Ukraine's internal and external predicament. Strategic thinkingThe inconsistencies, the disagreements in the deployment of troops, and the differences in the choice of equipment have all had an impact on Ukraine's **. In this situation, Ukraine urgently needs to act in concert with the military to counter the Russian threat and find an effective way to solve the internal and external dilemma.