In the tortuous course of China's anti-corruption in the past dynasties, the "clean silver" system in the Yongzheng period has attracted much attention. However, the implementation of this system ended in failure, exposing the dilemma of anti-corruption in ancient China. This article will delve into the implementation and results of the "clean silver" system in the Yongzheng period, reveal the paradox of the anti-corruption of the feudal system, and why the emperor himself has become a "criminal".
The financial crisis and anti-corruption attempts during the Yongzheng period.
Yongzheng inherited the heyday of the Manchu Qing dynasty, however, in the face of severe financial problems, he made a series of anti-corruption attempts. The first is the dilemma of local finances, and the rich provinces are in serious deficits, and Yongzheng firmly believes that this is related to the interception of taxes. Therefore, he demanded that the deficit** and the local provinces fill the deficit within three years, otherwise they will be severely punished. In practice, however, local provinces were able to withhold large amounts of tax revenue, even under Manchu regulations.
Yongzheng's "** contradicts the system.
In order to solve the problem, Yongzheng implemented the "Raising Honest Silver" system, aiming to reduce its corruption tendency by raising the salary of the first employee. However, this system faces obvious contradictions. The salaries of the high-level ** are too high, and the salaries of the grass-roots ** are too low, and it is difficult to stop the exploitation of the people. The system of maintaining incorruptible silver is essentially the office expenses of the local yamen, and it has not really put an end to the phenomenon of **.
The failure of the "clean bank" system and the paradox of anti-corruption.
Although the system of "raising honest banks" achieved some success in the early days, it eventually failed. This system has failed to reduce corruption, improve the country's real revenues and administrative efficiency, and alleviate social tensions. On the contrary, it has contributed to the increase in corruption to a certain extent. In the absence of institutional supervision, high salaries have become a hotbed for corruption, making it an indisputable fact that "high salaries do not necessarily support honesty, and low salaries will inevitably corrupt."
The paradox of anti-corruption under feudalism.
The anti-corruption attempts of the Yongzheng period revealed the paradox of anti-corruption under the feudal system. Relying on the feudal system to succeed in fighting corruption is itself an insurmountable obstacle. Yongzheng was committed to maintaining his feudal rule, but he tried to solve the problem through the "incorruptible silver" system, but encountered practical difficulties. The key to fighting corruption lies in system building, and relying on the feudal system is obviously an unrealistic path.
Reflection and Prospects: A Long Journey to Anti-Corruption.
Although the anti-corruption attempt during the Yongzheng period ended in failure, it provided valuable experience for the subsequent anti-corruption process. History tells us that the fight against corruption cannot only rely on high salaries or harsh punishments, but also requires a sound institutional system and an effective supervision mechanism. Only under the constraints of the system can we not dare to be greedy, not to be greedy, and not to be greedy. Although the anti-corruption attempt during the Yongzheng period was unsuccessful, it also provided a profound reflection on the future anti-corruption road.
Conclusion: The road to anti-corruption is long, and the system is the foundation.
The Yongzheng period of the "clean silver" system is an episode in the history of ancient China's anti-corruption, although it ended in failure, but it contains profound lessons behind it. The road to anti-corruption is long, and only by building a sound system and truly achieving that anti-corruption is not only an end but also a means can we take solid steps in the long river of history. May we continue to explore on the road of anti-corruption and move towards a new peak in system building.
This article deeply analyzes the dilemma faced in the anti-corruption attempt during the Yongzheng period, as well as the root causes of the failure of the "clean bank" system. Through the combing and analysis of historical events, it not only presents the political and economic situation at that time, but also provides us with profound anti-corruption enlightenment.
First of all, the article clearly points out the paradox of the feudal system behind the anti-corruption attempts in the Yongzheng period. The feudal system is inherently a self-protection mechanism, and trying to solve the problem of anti-corruption through the means within this system is often half the effort. This is instructive for understanding why anti-corruption has been a difficult problem in China's history. The article thoroughly reveals that relying on the feudal system to successfully fight corruption is a paradox in itself, thus providing an important reference for us to understand the dilemma on the road of anti-corruption.
Secondly, the article analyzes the system of "raising honest silver" very thoroughly. Through the introduction of the financial crisis in the Yongzheng period, it is pointed out that the contradiction between the high-level salaries is too high and the grass-roots salaries are too low, and the article reveals the dilemma faced by the system at the implementation level. This point also has reference value for the anti-corruption practice in today's society, that is, anti-corruption cannot simply rely on the salary of employees, but also needs to dig deep into the inherent problems of the system.
The reflection and outlook of the article emphasizes the long exploration of the road to anti-corruption, and puts forward the need to improve the institutional system and effective supervision mechanism. This point also has important implications for the current society, anti-corruption is not only a temporary effort, but also requires long-term and systematic system construction. The article mentions that "only under the constraints of the system can we not dare to be greedy, do not use to be greedy, and cannot be greedy" This point of view is profound and incisive, pointing out the direction for today's anti-corruption work.
Finally, the article concludes with an expression of expectations for the anti-corruption path. The article mentions that "the road to anti-corruption is long, and only by building a sound system and truly achieving anti-corruption is not only an end, but also a means, can we take solid steps in the long river of history." This sentence can be described as hitting the nail on the head and profoundly sums up the main thrust of the article. On the road to anti-corruption, institutional building is fundamental, rather than simply relying on superficial means.
Overall, this article provides a unique insight into the history of anti-corruption in ancient China through an in-depth analysis of anti-corruption attempts during the Yongzheng period, as well as profound insights into contemporary anti-corruption practices. Through deep reflection on history, we can better move forward on the road of anti-corruption and contribute to building a clean politics and improving the social system.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!