Pan Hannian's bumpy fate, **The truth of "killable" in his mouth is revealed!
In the vicissitudes of the history of the Communist Party of China, Pan Hannian, who had made great achievements for the revolution, was imprisoned under the criticism of ***. What was the reason for the tragic fate of this revolutionary?Why did *** criticize him on many occasions and kill him?This article will analyze Pan Hannian's life in depth and uncover the political disputes and mysteries behind ***.
On April 3, 1955, Pan Hannian, the vice mayor of Shanghai, was secretly arrested, a decision that attracted widespread attention. However, Pan Hannian was not suspicious because of his meeting with Wang Jingwei, but because of his so-called "confession". ** At the General Assembly, it was clearly stated: "This man cannot be trusted from now on." "Why can a confession put the highly decorated Pan Hannian in such a predicament?
During the 25 years of the Communist Party's glorious history, Pan Hannian held a leadership position in Special Branch, responsible for intelligence work. He successfully navigated the various forces in Shanghai and gained the trust of the best with his excellent intelligence work ability. However, in the 1936 KMT-CCP negotiations, Pan Hannian was accused of "surrendering to the Kuomintang", which led to huge twists and turns in his life.
In the first KMT-CCP cooperation, Pan Hannian planned the "Fuzhou Incident" and actively contacted other patriots, making outstanding contributions to the Anti-Japanese War. However, in the 36 years of negotiations on the cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, Pan Hannian was suspected of being "two-faced" and colluding with Chiang Kai-shek. ** It was even mentioned at the congress: "Surrendered the Kuomintang in the 1936 Kuomintang-Communist negotiations." ”
This so-called "two-faced" identity became the fuse for Pan Hannian's tragic fate. Although the task force believes that his actions are all approved, in the eyes of ***, Pan Hannian seems to have betrayed during the period of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party.
After 27 years in prison, Pan Hannian was rehabilitated in 1979. During this period, the baptism of history gradually revealed that Pan Hannian's accusation of "internal rape" was actually unjust. Although he had met with Wang Jingwei, he did not divulge valuable information, let alone betray the party's beliefs.
** The "killable" remarks about Pan Hannian may have been based on political considerations at the time, but the fact that he was rehabilitated 27 years later shows that Pan Hannian was a loyal revolutionary. This tortuous and painful history tells us that political struggles in revolutionary times often involve complex power schemes and wrestling behind them.
Pan Hannian's fate is not only a personal tragedy, but also a confusing chapter in the history of the Communist Party of China. Today, we should examine this period of history and look at the people and events of the revolutionary period with a more sober eye, not only to commemorate the revolutionary martyrs, but also to draw lessons from history and guide the development of contemporary society.
Pan Hannian's life has experienced the twists and turns of the Communist Party of China, and his fate has intertwined a confusing historical chapter in the criticism of ***. This article reveals in detail the reasons why Pan Hannian was imprisoned for "confession", and what kind of political considerations the "killable" in the mouth of *** is.
First of all, Pan Hannian's confession became the fuse for his reversal of fate. In 1955, he was secretly arrested as the deputy mayor of Shanghai, and this decision did not stem from his meeting with Wang Jingwei, but because he confessed in the anti-party alliance called for by ***. This confession became the basis for *** to question him, which eventually led to his imprisonment. The article conducted an in-depth analysis of this, pointing out that the reason why Pan Hannian confessed was because he called on cadres who had contact with Rao Shushi to take the initiative to confess in late March 55. However, Pan Hannian's confession became his own crime, which made him pay a heavy price.
Secondly, Pan Hannian had made great achievements in the glorious history of the Communist Party in the past 25 years, but he was suspected of "duplicity" in the cooperation negotiations between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, which became the fuse of his tragic fate. He planned the "Fuzhou Incident" in the first KMT-CCP cooperation and actively contacted other patriots, but in the 36 years of KMT-CCP negotiations, he was considered to have betrayed the party's revolutionary beliefs. ** Mentioning at the congress that he "surrendered to the Kuomintang in the 1936 Kuomintang-Communist negotiations" caused him to lose trust in the party. However, the rehabilitation 27 years later confirmed the innocence of Pan Hannian, who did not surrender to the KMT in the negotiations, but suffered injustice because he was considered to have lost his temper.
Finally, Pan Hannian's fate reflects the complexity of political struggles during the revolutionary period. ** In the critique of Pan Hannian, it may have been motivated by the political situation at the time, but the rehabilitation 27 years later revealed that Pan Hannian was a loyal revolutionary. This history tells us that the wrestling and power schemes in political struggle are complex and profound, and we should examine history with a sober eye, draw lessons from it, and guide the development of contemporary society.
Overall, this article shows a tortuous and profound story in the history of the Communist Party of China through a detailed analysis of Pan Hannian's life. Pan Hannian's fate is not only his personal tragedy, but also a painful imprint in the history of the revolution, reminding us to be objective and impartial in our understanding of historical figures, and at the same time to reflect on the complexity of political struggles and the twists and turns of human nature.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!