In the Chinese spy war drama market, a new drama "Thrush" entered the audience's field of vision like CCTV waving the flag, but it encountered unprecedented strong resistance after its launch. Why did this originally highly anticipated work be violently attacked by the audience?In-depth analysis, the doubts are mainly focused on two aspects: the acting skills of the actors and the logic of the plot.
The first to bear the brunt is the heroine Peng Xiaoran, whose role as Pang Hongmei has caused widespread dissatisfaction among the audience. Audiences have accused her of poor acting skills and inability to truly present the emotions of the characters. Pang Hongmei was originally supposed to be a smart and brave policewoman, but she was described by the audience as a character who "has no soul". The acting skills are stiff, the expression is stiff, and some people even wonder if she has undergone plastic surgery, and the makeup is over-retouched, which is contrary to the style of the fifties in which the plot is located. The male protagonist Liu Xueyi was not spared, the audience thought that he did not match the character's temperament, and his performance lacked personal charm, as if he was watching a sloppy clown performance.
Subsequently, the audience's questioning eyes turned to the plot itself. The absurd plot of the spy standing still in the rush scene in the play became the target of public criticism, and the audience accused this plot of not being logical. In the plot of the male and female protagonists docking codes, the plot is criticized as full of loopholes. The enemy forces actually gained trust without much effort, but Pang Hongmei was unable to provide any evidence, and the audience called it full of loopholes and ridiculous.
Overall, "The Thrush" became the mouth of the audience"A work of pain points", the actors' poor acting skills and chaotic plot logic made this work promoted by CCTV encounter a storm of doubts from the audience. Audience criticism pointed to the crew's mistakes in actor selection and historical restoration, believing that this was a serious failure of audience communication. It is mercilessly pointed out that the failure of "Thrush" is not a single reason, but a dual problem of the actors' acting skills and the logic of the plot.
In today's increasingly demanding audience for acting skills, the flaws of "Thrush" are even more prominent. Xu Zheng once said: "The spring of a good actor has arrived!.""In this work, however, the audience feels like a barren land. The audience emphasized that the performance of acting skills is not a tree without roots and water without a source, but it is necessary to deeply grasp the essence of the role and convey the emotions full of the atmosphere of the times to the audience. However, the two leading actors in "Thrush" seem to have dragged this task into a dull quagmire, unable to bring the slightest resonance to the audience.
For an excellent spy war drama, historical restoration is an indispensable part. Viewers found that the show had obvious historical holes in its costumes and makeup, which was out of touch with the social context of the time. The audience expressed dissatisfaction with this, emphasizing that film and television dramas should respect history, and the dresses of the heroes and heroines in the play are too delicate and fashionable, which is incompatible with the poor and backward era. This made the audience deeply indignant at the crew's contempt for history.
In this word-of-mouth storm, the audience's right to speak is becoming more and more prominent. No longer in the hands of professionals and elites, but completely in the hands of the audience. If the audience agrees that the actor is not acting well, that is the truth. Therefore, one of the big failures of "Thrush" is that it chose the wrong actor, and the audience hopes that future productions will be more cautious about this important part.
In general, "Thrush" has been overwhelmingly criticized by the audience for the poor acting skills of the actors and the confusing logic of the plot. The audience strongly expressed their dissatisfaction with the crew, believing that this spy war drama could not win their hearts. A good work needs to be carefully polished, and it needs to know how to choose actors and capture the audience's appetite, rather than engaging in hasty work and fooling the audience with nonsensical explanations. The poor reputation of a work not only means that the audience resists, but also a wake-up call to the production team, reminding them to be more attentive and cautious in their future creations.
Every detail.