In 1955, the squadron was solemnly awarded the rank and selected the "Top Ten Marshals" who went down in history. Among them, Mr. Zhu is at the top of the list as the commander-in-chief of our army, which is indisputable. However, after **, why is it not as controversial as *** and others?What were the factors that made him lag behind the other marshals in the ranks?
Among the criteria for the selection of marshals, the rank of marshal is awarded to senior generals who have created and led the people's armed forces or led the battle corps in battle, and who have made outstanding meritorious contributions. It is necessary not only to look at the war of liberation, but also to comprehensively consider various factors. Mr. He's marshal status is here"Create a people's army"It has a huge advantage in this point, far surpassing Mr. Chen.
First of all, Mr. He served as the commander-in-chief of the Nanchang Uprising, which opened the prelude to the construction of our army. After the failure of the uprising, he braved the hardships and dangers to form the Red Second Front Army, which became a unique highlight. In contrast, Mr. Chen had a lower status during the Red Army period, and did not have the status of a founder like Mr. He.
Secondly, during the Long March, Mr. He waged a resolute struggle with Zhang Guotao and prevented the Red Army. The decisive action at this critical moment demonstrates Mr. He's leadership and adherence to the revolutionary cause. Mr. Chen, on the other hand, insisted on guerrilla warfare in the south and made great contributions to the preservation of the Red Army, but he did not achieve such a prominent position in the pattern at that time.
Third, as the commander of the 120th Division of the Eighth Route Army in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, Mr. He established a huge Jinsui base area, which provided security and living security for the first class. At the same time, Mr. Chen, as the commander of the New Fourth Army, also made great contributions in the Anti-Japanese War. During this period, the two went hand in hand.
Finally, in the War of Liberation, Mr. He gave up continuing to command the First Field Army and turned to be responsible for logistics, providing key material support for the army. This kind of selfless attitude is almost unmatched. In contrast, Mr. Chen has achieved a brilliant victory on the battlefield, but his performance in logistics is relatively bleak.
Overall, Mr. He has performed well in the creation of the People's Army, the Anti-Japanese War period, the course of the Long March, and the logistics of the Liberation War. Compared with Mr. Chen, his ranking in the selection of marshals is undisputed. The deep-seated consideration behind this ranking is a comprehensive and comprehensive assessment of military merit, leadership and contributions from all sides. Behind the list of marshals is the great achievements of a generation of military leaders, and it is also a vivid portrayal of the history of the Chinese revolution.
This article provides an in-depth interpretation of the difference between the rankings of ** and ** in the selection of the top ten marshals, and fully demonstrates the outstanding contributions of the two military leaders in the history of the Chinese revolution. At the beginning of the article, the author clarified the indisputable status of Marshals such as Commander-in-Chief Zhu, Commander-in-Chief Peng, and **, and turned the focus to the controversial ranking between ** and **, presenting readers with a contest of revolutionary merits and military leadership.
In explaining why ** is ahead of ** on the list of marshals, the article provides an in-depth analysis through multiple angles. First of all, it is emphasized"Create a people's army"The importance of this selection criterion clearly points out that **, as the commander-in-chief of the Nanchang Uprising, has a unique identity as the founder, and ** has not achieved such a prominent position at this historical node. This is corroborated by the evaluation of the status of the two in the Red Army, ** created the Red Second Front Army, while ** had a relatively low status in the Red Army and played more of the role of political work cadres.
Secondly, the article highlights the decisive actions of the Red Army in the critical historical period, especially the resolute struggle against Zhang Guotao during the Long March, and the maintenance of the overall unity of the Red Army. The decisions made during this period not only demonstrated the leadership of the first class, but also played a key role in maintaining the overall stability of the Red Army. In contrast, although the persistence of guerrilla warfare in the south has contributed, it has not been comparable to ** in the overall pattern.
Third, the article praised his performance in the War of Resistance Against Japan, and especially emphasized his excellent command as the commander of the 120th Division of the Eighth Route Army and his security guarantee for **. The contribution of this period was in stark contrast to his status as a commander of the New Fourth Army, and his success in establishing the Jinsui base area also became an important asset in the selection of marshals.
Finally, the article highlights the selfless attitude of the logistics work in the Liberation War, handing over the troops to others, and personally taking charge of the material support. This played a crucial role in evaluating the position of marshal of **, showing his extraordinary demeanor in the leadership.
Overall, this article vividly demonstrates his outstanding performance in the history of the revolution through exhaustive factual analysis and sound logical arguments, and explains why he came before ** in the selection of marshals. The author's grasp of historical details and consideration of the deeper considerations behind the facts enable readers to understand more fully the contributions of these two great military leaders and to gain a deeper understanding of their place in the history of the Chinese revolution.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!