Liaoning men's basketball teamA 28-point win was achieved against the Sichuan team, but in the final moments of the game, a fierce clash occurred. With the last second left in the game, Yu Zechen of the Liaoning team chose to make a three-point shot, although he did not score, but this move angered all the players of the Sichuan team. From the coachZhang DeguiAt the beginning, and then to the players, they all expressed anger at Yu Zechen's ignorance of the rules and disrespect for the opponent. Even when the coaches of both sides shook hands,Zhang Deguihas been lingering on the scene, and the head coach of the Liaoning team on the spotUgoLopezBlame. As a result, the two sides clashed.
Expanding: The clash of this game has sparked a pairLiaoning men's basketball teamQuestioning the behavior of the last-minute shot. Some believe that in the case of a large lead, it is better to choose to consume time than make a final attack. Therefore, well-knowncbaJournalists Shao Huaqian and Fu Zhenghao both criticized the behavior of the Liaoning team. They believe that Yu Zechen's shot is not appropriate, and the Liaoning team should treat the game with a more professional attitude, and choose to consume the time in this case. This kind of behavior not only does not conform to the unspoken rules, but also causes speculation and dissatisfaction among others. Whether it's an international tournament or a domestic competition, the team with the leading score will generally give up the last attack, choosing instead to keep the score to avoid a clash that will occur. Both reporters used it".Killing people is not enoughTo describe the behavior of the Liaoning team, thinking that they poured salt on the wounds of the other party. This can't help but make people think, is it really necessary for the Liaoning team to do this?
Sports WeeklyShao Huaqian, a well-known reporter, commented on the game and expressed his opinion on Yu Zechen's shot. He believes that the head coach of the Liaoning teamUgoLopezHis performance after the game showed that he did not approve of Yu Zechen's shot either. Shao Huaqian pointed out that whether it is domestic or international, the team with the leading garbage time generally chooses to consume time rather than make a final attack. He called on the Liaoning team to treat the game more rationally and professionally.
Another bitcbaFu Zhenghao, a well-known ** person and reporter, is also rightLiaoning men's basketball teamThe behavior was criticized. He believes that Yu Zechen's whistle-blowing shot almost caused a group fight between the two sides. In the case of a large lead, the leader will generally give up the last attack, which is the norm. But Yu Zechen chose to make a move, even if the outcome has been decided, this kind of behavior is not appropriate, and it will cause dissatisfaction and speculation from others. Fu Zhenghao further pointed out that the professional arena needs to treat the game with a professional attitudeLiaoning men's basketball teamdoes not meet this requirement.
Expanded: Shao Huaqian and Fu Zhenghao's criticism has caused widespread discussion. They think,Liaoning men's basketball teambehaved inappropriately, not only violatedContest Rules, also contrary to professionalism. In the case of a large lead, a more rational and professional approach should be chosen, rather than to express dissatisfaction with the opponent. They believe that the behavior of the Liaoning team not only ignores the rules, but may also cause greater controversy and conflict. In this regard, the head coach of the Liaoning teamUgoLopezalso apologized, but the coach of the Sichuan teamZhang DeguiBut he was obsessed with this and demandedUgoLopezDiscipline the inappropriate behavior of subordinates.
Liaoning men's basketball teamThe reason why they chose to shoot at the last moment may be because of a series of off-the-board moves by the Sichuan team before the game, which caused them to be angry. Before the start of the game, the Sichuan team deliberately did not turn on the heating, resulting in the players of the Liaoning teamAllen GuoHaving to sit on the bench in a down jacket, the cold venue made them extremely uncomfortable. WhileZhao JiweiWhen he was substituted, the bad situation of the whole court black for 5 seconds also seriously affected his vision. Coupled with the audience's abuse and personal attacks, the Liaoning team chose to attack the basket in garbage time. It can be said that this series of behaviors led to:Liaoning men's basketball teamSuch a decision was finally made.
Expanding: Understanding the background of the game, we can seeLiaoning men's basketball teamThe act is not without reason. The off-the-board move of the Sichuan team before the game led to the dissatisfaction and anger of the Liaoning team. The Sichuan team deliberately did not turn on the heating, which made the stadium extremely cold, and even the players of the Liaoning team had to wear down jackets to withstand the severe cold. WhileZhao JiweiWhen he was on the field, the black light for 5 seconds brought him great trouble, affected his vision, and increased the dissatisfaction of the Liaoning team. In addition, the audience's abuse and personal attacks on the Liaoning team further intensified the tension of the game. Scoring on an empty basket in garbage time may be the cumulative result of this series of behaviors, promptingLiaoning men's basketball teamIn the end, such a decision was made.
Through the analysis and discussion of this game, we can see the parties' interest in the gameLiaoning men's basketball teamThere are differing opinions and opinions on last-minute action. On the one hand, the behavior of the Liaoning team was questioned as non-compliantContest Rulesand work ethic, accused of rubbing salt in the wounds of opponents. On the other hand, Liaoning's behavior can be found in the contextual interpretation, and a series of unfair treatment before the game can lead to the team's dissatisfaction and anger.
In general, for the professionBasketballIn the game, the team should maintain a professional attitude, abide by the rules and unspoken rules, and respect the opponent. At the same time, it is necessary to approach the game rationally and not act inappropriately due to personal emotions or provocations from opponents. In this game,Liaoning men's basketball teamThe act has aroused widespread concern and controversy, and we should examine and interpret this incident from different angles and avoid being too one-sided and biased. After all, there is no absolute right or wrong answer for everyoneContest Rulesand the understanding of professional ethics may vary. We should think about and discuss such issues in an objective, rational and comprehensive manner. Above all, it is hoped that similar conflicts will be properly resolved without causing too much damage to sportsmanship and the team's image.