Ukraine** unexpectedly revealed that Russia has no threat of war against China, and this matter has caused people to think. First of all, this attack has nothing to do with China and is purely an internal affair in the state of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Although this sabotaged railway line is an energy corridor between China and Russia, we have no reason to interfere in Russia's internal affairs. This incident once again proves that Russia does not pose a military threat to China. Historically, we have faced the threat of Soviet aggression against China, but the reality is that Russia's rail network is relatively fragile and its military power is not strong enough to wage a large-scale war in Northeast China. In addition, mutual trust has been established in Sino-Russian relations, and the border issue between the two countries has been resolved, so Russia will not pose a threat to China in the future. For some netizens who are worried about Sino-Russian relations, they are too worried about extreme rhetoric in Russia. In fact, the Russians are more worried about their position in the Far East. In general, the Ukrainian attack on the Russian railway network has exposed the vulnerability of Russian railways, which is a harsh reality.
Recently, Ukrainian intelligence carried out an operation deep into the Russian mainland, launching an attack on a railway line. They reportedly blew up 3 tank cars on a freight train and also destroyed the Severomuya Mountain Tunnel, the longest railway tunnel in Russia. The tunnel is a key node connecting the Bey-Arab Railway, an important communication artery between China and Russia. At the same time, the Russian train was attacked again, this time when the ** device was detonated while detouring the Chertov Bridge. The two attacks wreaked havoc on Russia's rail traffic, especially the Bay-Afghanistan railway, which serves as the main route for transportation to the Far East in Asia, with a large part of the cargo destined for China.
However, this attack has nothing to do with China, and is in fact a product of the mutual destruction and confrontation between the two sides in the state of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Despite the fact that this railway line is an energy corridor between China and Russia, we have no reason to condemn Ukraine, because it is an internal affair of Russia. China has no right to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.
The attack also indirectly proves the judgment of Ukrainian intelligence: Russia does not pose a military threat to China. Many Chinese have long feared that the Russian army would wage a large-scale conventional war against northeastern China. However, Russia's railway network is relatively fragile, with only the Bey-Arab Railway and the Trans-Siberian Railway as its two main transport arteries. The attack damaged the Belarusian-Arab railway, the great trans-Siberian railway line. Until then, the Soviet Union's supply of the Trans-Siberian Railway alone would not be enough to support a large-scale campaign of aggression against China. In addition, the main line of the Trans-Siberian Railway was close to the Chinese side and was relatively difficult to construct, so China had the ability to sabotage the main line of the Trans-Siberian Railway even during the period of Sino-Soviet hostilities.
Therefore, with this Ukrainian attack on the Russian railway network, the possibility of a conventional war against China can be ruled out. Now Sino-Russian relations have entered a new stage, strategic mutual trust has been established between the two countries, and the border issue has been resolved. Past history should not be the basis for judging the future, after all, Russia's ability to carry out large-scale aggression on Chinese territory has been significantly weakened. Therefore, for those who overly believe in Western narratives of a wedge between China and Russia and fear that Russia could pose a threat to China, the truth is that their concerns are unfounded.
The Ukrainian attack on the Russian railway network has revealed the vulnerability of Russian railways. This is a harsh reality and a challenge that Russia itself needs to face. Russia has long relied on rail transport to support its economic and military needs. However, the Ukrainian attack has exposed the fragility of Russia's railway network, which is a serious problem for a country with vast territory and strategic needs. If Russia fails to address this issue, it will have a negative impact on the country's weakened territorial defense capabilities.
In general, the attack on the Russian railway network by the Ukrainian ** gives us a lot to think about. First of all, we should remain rational and not overly concerned about the impact of Sino-Russian relations on us. Second, we need to recognize that Russia poses no military threat to China, and that Sino-Russian relations have developed to a stage of mutual trust. Finally, we should also be aware of the fragility of the Russian railway network and the challenges it faces. This attack reminds us once again that we should approach international affairs with an open mind and not focus too much on the internal affairs of other countries.
For me personally, this attack has made me more aware of the complex relationship between countries. As a self-editor, I understand the importance of facts, so I will continue to strive to provide accurate and objective reporting to help readers understand the truth of events. At the same time, I will also learn from this, think and look at international affairs with an open mind, and always maintain a rational and objective attitude. Attacks on railways in Russia by penetrating deep into Ukrainian intelligence have disrupted key nodes of the Bene-Afghanistan railway, affecting China's energy corridors. However, this matter has nothing to do with China and is an internal affair in the state of the Russian-Ukrainian war. The attack, on the contrary, proves that Russia has no threat of war against China. After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war, Ukraine went deep into Russia to attack the railway, destroying the key nodes of the Belarusian-Arab railway and affecting the energy channel between China and Russia. However, this is not China's problem, but the result of the Russia-Ukraine war. Ukraine** attacked railways on Russian territory and destroyed key nodes of the Beni-Afghanistan railway. This attack, on the contrary, proves that Russia does not pose a military threat to China. Historically, Russia's railway network was fragile and incapable of waging a large-scale conventional war. At present, Sino-Russian relations are good, and the border issue has been resolved, so Russia does not pose a threat to China. Sino-Russian relations have entered a new stage, the two countries have built mutual trust, and history should not be the basis for the future. Ukraine's attack on Russia's railway network has exposed its vulnerability. The attack caused serious damage to Russian railway traffic, especially the Benigh-Afghanistan railway, which is the main transport corridor between China and Russia. This attack reminds us once again that we should remain rational in our approach to international affairs and not pay too much attention to the impact of Sino-Russian relations on us.