The controversy between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi over the dispute over the advance payment of 16 million yuan has become a hot topic on social platforms. Zhu Dan was deceived in the variety show** because of his signature, and later sued his friend and won, but because his friend declared bankruptcy, he finally assumed all the debts. According to the China Enforcement Information Disclosure Network, Zhu Dan had paid 16 million yuan in advance, but the person subject to execution, Tian Moumou, has not performed.
This incident involved a company called Beijing Pincheng Yuehui Cultural Communication, which was listed as a dishonest person subject to execution because it owed Zhu Dan 16 million yuan in advance, and was then restricted from high consumption. This series of disputes has triggered people's conjecture between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi, what kind of story is hidden behind it?This is a curious mystery. First of all, we pay attention to the relationship between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi and the cultural communication of Beijing Pincheng Yuehui involved
It is understood that the company was established in August 2010 with a registered capital of 3 million yuan, and Tian Moumou served as the legal representative, executive director, manager and wholly-owned shareholder, while Zhu Dan served as a supervisor. However, Zhu Dan has sued the company many times, and Houtian and the company were listed as dishonest judgment debtors for failing to pay Zhu Dan's 16 million yuan advance, and were restricted from high consumption. In addition, the company was included in the list of abnormal operations due to multiple violations, and finally had its business license revoked in May 2019.
This series of legal disputes has triggered speculation about the entanglement between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi, and they have speculated about the inside story. Subsequently, the background and details of the contradiction between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi. Although the original circumstances of the case of Zhu Dan and Tian Moumou about more than 16 million yuan have not been found on the China Judgment Document Online, the two have continued to wrestle in other related litigation.
Zhu Dan's lawsuit for a dispute over the change of company registration and the dispute over the confirmation of the company's shareholder qualifications all show that the entanglement between the two is complicated. These disputes have triggered a deep reflection on integrity and friendship in society. What kind of contradictions and disputes happened between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi, which led to such a situation in the end?On the whole, the dispute between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi not only involves a huge amount of money, but also involves the reputation and life of both parties.
This case has triggered speculation and speculation about the relationship between the two, and has also triggered deep thinking about integrity and friendship in society. In this series of entanglements, we may reflect on how people interact with each other, how we should make trade-offs between money and friendship, and our belief in law and fairness and justice. In the end, I can't help but think about whether there will be a day when the truth will be revealed in the dispute between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi?What are your thoughts and comments on this case?
The dispute between Zhu Dan and Tian Xiaomi has attracted widespread attention from the society, and we should also seriously consider the importance of interpersonal relationships, trust and legal rules to maintain fairness and justice. How do we choose between money and friendship?What are your thoughts and comments on this case?