Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Japan, which has a historical dispute with Russia, has been escalating sanctions against Russia, and with the support of the United States, it has been tougher. Japan has even listed the South Kuril Islands, which Russia actually controls, as its "own territory" in diplomatic documents, and has threatened to develop hypersonic missiles with a range of more than 2,000 kilometers. Recently, Japan has not only discharged nuclear sewage into the sea, but also made large-scale purchases, conducted military exercises, and frequently released military signals.
On the 30th, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida had a phone call with Ukraine's ** Zelensky, saying that he would continue to lead under the G7 presidency and provide Ukraine with $30 million in non-lethal assistance such as drone detection systems. Zelensky thanked him for this and looked forward to the signing of bilateral agreements in the field of security. This series of actions shows that Japan is not only providing material assistance, but also is likely to deepen its involvement in the situation between Russia and Ukraine, and even include the provision of lethal equipment.
However, Russia has launched a tough counterattack. On the 30th, Russia stepped up its actions on the issue of the South Kuril Islands, including hanging the national flag on the lighthouse on Xiangyu Island, painting white walls, and hanging items related to Orthodox Christianity. This is seen as a "sword from the closest distance" to Japan, and it is clearly a response to Japan's provocations, especially the "island-grabbing" rhetoric on the issue of the South Kuril Islands. In this regard, Japan **strongly**, but the Russian side did not respond.
The fact that the South Kuril Islands are under the de facto control of Russia is a fact recognized by international law after the war. Although Japan has signaled and proposed to "seize the island", it has been difficult to take substantive action in the legal and international arena. On the contrary, Russia can strengthen its claims to sovereignty over the South Kuril Islands by stationing troops on these islands and restricting fishing by Japanese fishermen.
In this context, we can look at the situation in three ways. First of all, provocation of Russia is a kick in the iron plate by Japan, and although the South Kuril Islands are only one of the problems, Russia has many ways to make Japan uncomfortable. In particular, the two countries have not yet concluded a peace treaty, so that the two sides are still theoretically in a "state of war".
Second, for Japan, which has always been "forbearing," provoking Russia means that it relies on the support of the United States and Britain, and at the same time highlights Japan's attempt to achieve "military deregulation" and "rise" by destabilizing the regional situation. Under these circumstances, Japan has not only not reined in, but has intensified its efforts to play right and wrong and conspire with the United States, Britain, and other countries to stir up the regional situation.
In the end, many acts of injustice will kill oneself, and Japan is now not only causing the international discharge of nuclear wastewater, but also acting recklessly in the regional situation, putting itself in the "defendant's seat". With the escalation of crises such as internal economy and inflation, Kishida**'s approval rating has dropped to 26%, and if he continues to take risks and provoke, he will inevitably face more countermeasures and resistance.
On the whole, Japan's frequent provocations against Russia are not only on the issue of the South Kuril Islands, but also a dangerous adventure that challenges international law and regional peace. At this moment, we can't help but wonder whether Japan's actions deserve the vigilance and reflection of the international community.
The article profoundly reveals the current tension in Russian-Japanese relations, especially focusing on the game over the issue of the South Kuril Islands. From the article, we can see that Japan's repeated provocations and military deterrence against Russia, as well as its frequent cooperation with the United States, show its positive posture in regional affairs. However, Russia has also shown a strong will to fight back, sending a clear signal to Japan about its insurmountable bottom line by sending a clear signal to Japan with its actions in the South Kuril Islands.
First of all, the article mentions Japan's attitude towards the South Kuril Islands, which is not only listed as its "own territory", but also frequently expresses its ** towards Russia in international affairs. Such words and deeds have aroused Russia's resentment and made the international community feel the heightened tensions in the region. In particular, as Japan continues to increase its support for Ukraine, the relationship between Russia and Japan has become more complicated.
Secondly, the article points to Russia's "Bright Sword at the Closest Distance" countermeasure against Japan by making a lighthouse move on the South Kuril Islands. This kind of obvious demonstration has made it difficult for Japan to ignore it. Russia's tough response shows that they are uncompromising in defending their territorial sovereignty and national interests. It is also a diplomatic tactic conducted through deeds, not words, that puts Japan under pressure over the South Kuril Islands.
In addition, the article mentions Japan's support for Ukraine, especially in terms of military equipment assistance. This suggests that Japan seeks greater influence in international affairs, especially in the matter of confrontation with Russia. However, this approach has also raised Russia's alarm, escalating the confrontation between the two countries to a more sensitive and complex level.
Finally, the article provides a profound reflection on what Japan has done. In particular, in the face of the international discharge of nuclear wastewater and the intensification of internal economic problems, it is worth pondering whether Japan should be so aggressive in regional affairs. The article argues that Japan may be taking risks and provocations, and such actions could lead to more countermeasures and boycotts.
In general, the article reveals the sensitivity and complexity of current Russian-Japanese relations through objective statements of facts and insightful analysis. The international community should pay close attention to the situation in the region and urge all parties to resolve their differences through dialogue and consultation so as to avoid the escalation of the conflict.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!