There is not much left of US military aid to Ukraine, and Biden's 60 billion military spending has also been vetoed by Congress, in order to pass this bill, Blinken ** bluntly said that 90% of US aid is on the territory of the United States itself.
This is a very reasonable question, why would Blinken, who has always been open-mouthed, tell the truth?Does he like to tell the truth?An American politician would even tell the truth, that is, he has exhausted his donkey skills.
The $60 billion military support plan proposed by the United States was rejected by the US Congress, this plan is very critical, if there is no such funding, then the United States will cut off military support for Ukraine, and the United States will stop supporting Russia, then the military support of Europe and Japan will be cut off, the G7 has been held several times, and Europe and Japan have made it clear that the reason why they want to help Ukraine is entirely for the sake of the United States.
But the question is, why did the politicians in the United States actually produce ** because of the assistance of the Ukrainian army?
One is that the Russian-Ukrainian war has lasted so long, Ukraine can no longer hold on, and on the Russian side, it is still alive and kicking, Putin's plane is flying everywhere, going to China today, going to the Middle East the next day, the United States' sanctions on Ukraine have instead become a reason for Putin to become famous, everyone understands that the United States' sanctions against Putin and Russia are nothing at all, and American politicians will be ashamed, if even the American people think this is a shameful thing, then it makes no sense for them to help Ukraine。
The most important thing is that the United States has provided Ukraine with a lot of money, but it has no effect, and the United States itself is already very poor, and it has to help other countries, which makes them very unhappy.
Blinken had to admit that although the United States has funded Ukraine with a lot of money, more funds are in the United States, while Ukraine has purchased guns and artillery from the United States, and in the end, this money will fall into the hands of the United States. In this way, American citizens and American politicians will understand that billions of dollars in military spending will eventually fall into the hands of the United States. It is really the US ** team that comes to the aid of the United States, and Ukraine is looking forward to returning home as soon as it says goodbye.
For Americans, however, the dollar is just a piece of waste paper. To put it mildly, if it weren't for the fear that its credibility would be threatened, the United States would be free to print it, and part of the reason why Blinken said this was to bring benefits to the parliament, but in fact, although the money was taken away by the United States, it was indeed given. On the whole, this is not a good thing. But American politicians have never thought about their own country, and for their own interests, they can even betray the United States.
So, did the United States really profit from the war between Russia and Ukraine?If the United States gives up cooperation with Russia, it is difficult to say how big the losses will be, but if Russia can hold out to this day, and the United States persists, then the losses of the United States will be even greater.
But if the Russian-Ukrainian war aside, the United States has spent billions of dollars on the US military industry, which has played a great role in their economic development. If I have to say, they don't want to help Ukraine, they just want to help the US military industry so that they have the ability to compete with China.
But even if they have recovered, compared to China, it is still a big difference, the United States thinks well, but they still underestimate the cost of the Russian-Ukrainian war, as well as their military power.