There will be rain in the madness of the sky, and disaster in the madness of the people.
This female executive was in Beijing, and she never expected that she would just casually fire an insignificant subordinate, which would actually arouse public anger!
This female executive once recklessly shouted "What can you do with me if you break the law" and "I have people in labor arbitration", but in the end she also paid the due price.
The recent sensational incident is the "female executive fired male employees suspected of violating the law", and as the incident continues to heat up, people have begun to expose the inside story of the company where the female executive works. In order to avoid being implicated, the company has launched an investigation and issued a statement.
The female executive involved was dealt with accordingly: she has been ordered to stop introspection!
What's going on here?How can you ensure your rights and interests in such a situation in the workplace?
According to a January 6 Qilu Evening News report, a female executive at a Beijing company violated the rules on terminating a labor contract and got into an argument with a male employee.
However, when netizens saw the relevant **, they couldn't suppress their anger, and even began to question what her background was to be so arrogant?
According to online rumors**, a female executive and a male employee are arguing. Although it was only a little more than a minute, it gave birth to the first internet buzzword of 2024: "Can you still control my law".
I've told you that I'm going to terminate the contract now, can you control me?Try and see if you can't find a job for two and a half years.
Immediately pack up my things and leave, labor arbitration first and second instance, I have people, I will wait for you slowly, you don't want to find a job again.
The dispute between executives and employees has become widely known, and for a time it was as if Qin Shi Huang had arrived. not only violated the legal provisions on the termination of labor contracts, but also unashamedly claimed that she had a backer somewhere, so disdainful of Chinese law, and openly stated that she would break the law, who gave her such confidence?
Who is the "someone" she is referring to?
In the workplace, this contradiction is very common, because no one can guarantee that they will be fully competent when they join the company, and no one can guarantee that they will not have problems at work. However, it is indeed incomprehensible that he has such an attitude and such an arrogant statement.
Even the lowest employees should be protected by relevant laws and regulations, and they should also enjoy the most basic human rights. Even if they don't have a lot of income, you shouldn't use such words to sarcastically or ridicule them, right?
Therefore, as soon as *** netizens immediately expressed their relevant opinions and were restless.
This netizen from Jilin saw the facts clearly: "The female executive is not ignorant of the law, but understands that arbitration takes a long time, ordinary people really can't afford it, and the cost of the company's violation of the law is very low, just pay compensation." ”
The netizen questioned: "Are you blatantly challenging the law?".Isn't that you just not respecting the laws of the mainland?”
Her behavior made some people feel that the people of Beijing were disgraced, but fortunately the people she met were emotionally stable, otherwise the consequences would have been unimaginable. If you don't deal with this out-of-control woman, it can lead to endless trouble.
The netizen said that if the female executive was not dealt with and the legitimate rights and interests of male employees were not protected, it would become the sorrow of all workers.
As the incident sparked heated discussions, a technology company to which the woman involved belonged also issued a note, including the following points:
Jing, a female executive of the company's HR, and Sun, a male employee, had a dispute over the termination of the labor relationship.
Due to his emotion, Jing made inappropriate remarks to everyone, and hereby sincerely apologizes.
Jing has been suspended and has begun to reflect.
Mr. Sun joined the company on June 25, 2023, when he signed a three-year employment contract and a confidentiality and non-compete agreement. Due to his ability to work and not meet the requirements, he failed to pass during the probationary period.
The date of termination of the employment relationship between the two parties was December 1, and the November salary and severance compensation were paid at the same time.
It seems that the labor relationship between them has been peacefully terminated, and Sun has been given wages and compensation according to the regulations, and Jing has also been suspended. In that case, why is there still a dispute?If it weren't for this dispute, how could Sun protect his rights and interests?
Despite the company's explanations, it failed to answer the most important question: What is Jing's background?Why would it be claimed that someone is behind it?
According to the company's public information, the company was established in April 2021 with a registered capital of $11 million, and there are two other companies under the executive director.
It seems that this company is a legit company that specializes in chip development and has not been around for long. Such companies have a high turnover of employees, and labor disputes are common. Therefore, for them, the termination of an intern's employment contract is nothing at all.
No one expected that Mr. Sun would not accept labor arbitration, but "network arbitration", and this time Manager Jing was really exposed to be incomplete.
According to online information, Director Jing graduated from Tsinghua University and has held positions in two other well-known companies. Previously, employees of these companies broke the news and called her "Exterminator Shitai", describing her as arrogant, uninhibited, noble and irresponsible.
The reputation of these two companies is not very good. Maybe they just said something innocuous when they were emotional, maybe they dared to talk about it because they had a lot of experience and a background in a prestigious school. But the exact reason is known only to them.
Although the above information is from online rumors, its authenticity is still questionable. Therefore, everyone should be rational and cautious when observing and expressing opinions.
However, this raises a related question: how can employees ensure their rights?
Many companies are used to terminating employees for a variety of reasons within a few days of the end of their probationary period because there are many benefits to doing so. First, probationary employees are often paid less, allowing for the highest benefits at the lowest cost.
The second thing to consider is insurance. At present, many companies use the excuse of "turning in after the probationary period" or "turning in after the performance is achieved" to attract job seekers to work for the company, even if the salary is low. However, this practice has actually broken the law. For job seekers, it's likely that they don't know it.
According to the relevant laws, employers should pay insurance for employees within 30 days of their employment;In other words, regardless of whether the employee is on probation or not, as long as the employee has been working for one month, he or she should apply for insurance.
The employee can terminate the employment contract and demand financial compensation if the company violates the relevant regulations.
Nowadays, however, most job seekers are unaware of the law, and employers exploit loopholes to "prostitute" interns.
Terminating an intern for a variety of reasons until the end of the internship period is a surefire way to avoid insurance liability and maximize the value of the intern.
Therefore, the situation that Mr. Sun faced in this incident was that he was told that he could not officially become a regular after working for the company for half a year. This was even worse for Mr. Sun, who had worked hard for half a year but had to find a new job and go through a new internship before the end of the year.
According to a Beijing-based lawyer, in theory, an employer can terminate an employee's employment at any time during the probationary period. However, many employers have a flaw in this regard, namely the failure to provide evidence that employees do not meet the requirements for employment. If such evidence cannot be provided, then the redundancy will also constitute an offence.
Therefore, in this case, the employer should first clearly inform the offer conditions before hiring, i.e., the conditions under which the employee will be able to obtain a formal position, such as how much performance needs to be achievedHow many customers need to be expanded, etc.
When determining that an employee has failed to complete a task, the criteria and proportional requirements for rejection should be clearly defined, rather than a one-sentence veto by HR. Reasonable explanations should be given and reasons should be given to support the decision.
Before looking for a job, as a job seeker, we should familiarize ourselves with various laws and keep relevant evidence such as clock-in records and work** during the work period, so as to effectively protect our rights and interests in the event of a dispute.
In this incident, the intern Mr. Sun was obviously dissatisfied with his treatment, so he looked for HR theory, but he didn't expect the other party to say something like "it's illegal, there are people on it".
Mr. Sun couldn't find a job for two and a half years, and was ridiculed by her and had to spend time with her in labor arbitration. Judging by her tone, it seems that she often fights such lawsuits, but it is uncertain whether anyone has succeeded.
Everyone should understand that even if you are involved in this kind of lawsuit, you can look for a job while fighting the lawsuit, just by attending the ** time.
Therefore, this also shows that when we encounter such a strong company, we need not be afraid, we just need to preserve the evidence and initiate labor arbitration, believing that the law will definitely do justice for us.
What are your thoughts on this issue?Are there similar cases around?Welcome to leave a message to discuss!