The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Gaza Strip continues, and the parties are divided on the search for a humanitarian ceasefire. The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire, but Israel continued its military operations due to the lack of coercive force. Israel insists on its right to self-defence, rejects ceasefire demands and plans for a protracted war in Gaza. This decision has aroused the attention and controversy of the international community.
Despite the overwhelming adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of the proposal calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, the Israeli representative, Erdan, once again rejected the United Nations ceasefire demand. The Israeli side insists that they have the right to self-defense and blames the Hamas office as the source of the conflict. They claim that Israel's security can only be ensured by destroying Hamas's military might. This position has sparked questions and criticism from the international community about Israel's decision-making.
Israel has taken strong military action against Hamas's military force. The fortifications in Gaza are strong, and Hamas has built many facilities and passages underground. Israel is trying to weaken Hamas's military capabilities through strikes against these targets. However, due to Hamas's activities in the densely populated Gaza Strip, military operations inevitably cause harm to innocent civilians, triggering international concern and condemnation of Israel's actions.
Israeli Defense Minister Gallant said Israel needed months to continue its military operations in Gaza rather than the immediate ceasefire that the international community expects. He noted that Hamas, a terrorist organization that has long been preparing for an attack on Israel, has built strong fortifications and underground facilities in Gaza. Therefore, Israel believes that this war will not end soon and that it will take longer to defeat Hamas.
The Israeli Defense Minister's remarks have raised international concerns about Israel's military operations. It is feared that this means that Israel will remain in Gaza for a long time or even temporarily occupy the city. It is worth noting that Israel** has frequently emphasized the continuity of military action in recent speeches, which has been interpreted by some analysts as an attempt by Israel to change the international community's perception of war. However, such decisions could lead to further humanitarian crises and regional instability.
The international community has unanimously expressed concern and condemnation of Israel's decision to reject the United Nations demand for a ceasefire and to plan for a protracted war. It is believed that such decisions will lead to more bloodshed and destruction, bringing more pain and suffering to the inhabitants of Gaza. At the same time, it will also have a negative impact on the peace process and regional stability.
Many observers have pointed out that Israel's decision means that they will remain in Gaza for a long time and temporarily occupy it in the name of fighting Hamas. This has raised concerns about Israel's choice for the future of Gaza after the conflict ends. While Israel has repeatedly stated in the past that it will not occupy Gaza, the protracted military campaign and occupation posture have called into question Israel's integrity.
The conflict in the Gaza Strip has sparked international concern and controversy at the United Nations. Israel rejected the UN's demand for a ceasefire and planned a protracted war. The decision has sparked concern and criticism in the international community, which fears it will lead to more humanitarian crises and regional instability. Concern was expressed about Israel's choice for the future of Gaza after the end of the conflict, and the international community was called upon to intensify its efforts to promote a ceasefire and the peace process.