"Work until the last moment of your life! This view caused an uproar at the 2023 Global Wealth Management Forum, made by an economist with a more avant-garde view. His remark that by 2050, the average human life expectancy will reach an incredible 100 years, and may even extend to 120 years. This means that we need to not only re-examine the definition of "retirement", but also consider whether this view is contrary to the current retirement system.
The expert stressed that individuals should continue to work, contributing their wisdom and experience until the last moment of their lives, unless health reasons do not allow it. This view has sparked widespread controversy in society. On the one hand, some people think that this is an unfair demand for the elderly, and it seems to ignore their right to enjoy life and rest in their old age. Some, on the other hand, believe that this may be a pragmatic way to address the challenges as society ages.
However, we have to think deeply about whether this concept applies to everyone. The current retirement system is based on a set of basic assumptions, including the right to rest and benefits after a certain number of years of service. If "work to the end of life" is placed under this system, it will inevitably lead to questioning and adjustment of the existing system.
One of the aims of the retirement system is to enable individuals to enjoy their old age in old age, rather than being forced into a competitive workplace. However, if we continue to work until the end of life, does it mean that the elderly will lose this opportunity to enjoy? Does this pose a potential threat to the employment opportunities and career advancement of the younger generation?
Work until the end of your life" is indeed in contradiction with the current retirement system. The traditional retirement system is based on the idea that individuals have the right to rest, benefits and quality of life after a certain number of years of service. This includes society's commitment to providing pensions, health care and other benefits to the elderly.
However, if we encourage individuals to work until the end of their lives, this seems to be contrary to the original purpose of the traditional retirement system. The concept of retirement is intended to allow individuals to enjoy their old age in their old age, away from the busy workplace, and enjoy life. If the work is extended to the end of life, then the retirement system may need to be rethought and adjusted.
One of the questions raised by this claim is whether older people lose the opportunity to enjoy life in their later years. One of the aims of the retirement system is to ensure that older people have time to rest and pursue their interests, rather than spending a long time in a competitive workforce. If we promote lifelong work, will it threaten the right of older people to enjoy their old age?
In addition, for the younger generation, if older people work all the time, will it have a detrimental effect on employment opportunities and career advancement? It may lead to more fierce competition in the workplace, making it difficult for young people to enter and advance.
Overall, there is a certain conflict between the current retirement system and the concept of "working until the end of life". In the future, we may need to revisit and adjust the retirement system to better meet society's needs for longevity and ensure that individuals can live with dignity and quality at different stages.
In the midst of this argument, we need a deeper discussion. This is not only a question of the retirement system, but also a reflection on the value of life, the meaning of work, and society's response to the era of longevity. Perhaps, we need to break out of the conventional mindset and rebuild a social system that is more flexible and adaptable to the challenges of the future. By delving into this topic, we are able to lead the way in society and find more balanced and humane solutions.