Recently, there was news that laid-off workers from state-owned enterprises were required to pay social security fees for 85 to 95 years. As the most affected group in the process of restructuring state-owned enterprises, the move of laid-off workers is undoubtedly extremely unfair to them. But from the point of view of state and social insurance**, there is also its rationality. This article will give a fair and in-depth look at this issue from the perspectives of laid-off workers and the state.
1. The confusion and dissatisfaction of laid-off workers.
For laid-off workers, 85-95 years have passed, and they have had a difficult life after being laid off, and many of them have been displaced for their livelihoods. In the past ten years, they have mainly relied on the policy of resettlement subsidies and other warm meals at all levels. Nowadays, the state and social security** require them to pay social security fees for this period, which is really unacceptable to them.
First of all, most laid-off workers were laid off at the time and were unemployed and could not afford to pay social security contributions. Secondly, they have not received any social security benefits over the years, and now they are required to pay back fees, which is really too big a deficit. In addition, after such a long period of time, it is difficult to complete the relevant supporting materials, and it will be difficult to carry out the procedure. They feel that the state and social security requirements** seem to be unfair.
2. Considerations of the state and social security**.
However, from the standpoint of the state and social security, their requirements are also reasonable. First of all, according to the laws of the country, it should be clear that citizens should pay corresponding fees to participate in social security. Secondly, the scale of social security is getting bigger and bigger, and it needs to be operated sustainably for a long time, and long-term payment gaps cannot be allowed.
In addition, with the continuous improvement of medical standards and social welfare, laid-off workers will also enjoy better social security benefits in the future. If they are not held accountable for their contributions at that time, it will have an impact on the fairness and sustainable operation of social security**. In order to protect the interests of more people, it is reasonable for the state and social security to require them to pay supplementary fees.
3. A compromise and compromise solution.
To sum up, the demands of laid-off workers and the state and social security have their reasonableness. This article argues that the best way to do this is to take a compromise and compromise approach.
For example, some laid-off workers may be exempted or exempted from social security contributions that should be paid at that time but have not actually been paid. For groups in real difficulty, the fee can be waived entirely. At the same time, they can also be given a certain amount of time (e.g. 3-5 years) to pay in installments.
In addition, the state and social security should also pay attention to the difficult situation of laid-off workers when implementing this work, reduce their burden to the greatest extent, and protect their legitimate rights and interests. It is only through understanding and mutual understanding that the best solution to the problem can be found.
In short, the problem of laid-off workers paying social security fees is a systematic project, which needs to be comprehensively demonstrated from multiple angles, and the best solution to the problem is to find a proper way to protect the interests of the state and social security, and also take care of the difficulties of laid-off workers.