The latest survey: The French and American people are calling for political reform, and the Western system is in doubt!
Recently, Capitol Hill** published a high-profile article titled "America Needs Major Political Reform to Consolidate Political System." Citing data from the Pew Research Center, the article shows that about 93 percent of French and Americans, and about 88 percent of Britons and Germans, expect some degree of change in their country's political system. A staggering 65% of Americans believe that the Western political system in the United States needs to be overhauled, or even overhauled, in order to survive.
This data has attracted widespread attention, especially in the context of the new crown epidemic exposing the flaws of the US and Western institutions. The United States, as the most developed country in the world, accounts for 25% of the world's infection and mortality rates, and the situation in countries such as Britain, France and Germany is not optimistic.
Challenges and Implications: The Epidemic Reveals Institutional Ills, and People Cry for Reform!
Fukuyama has repeatedly denied that the failure of Europe and the United States to fight the epidemic has something to do with the Western political system, but the facts are in front of him. Even though the United States and Europe have first-class medical conditions, their performance in the epidemic is no different from that of third world countries, and even worse than that of many third world countries. Although there is no systematic theory among the people, they have real feelings.
Surveys show that more than half of people in France and the United States want to change are calling for significant action. Outside of the pandemic, France has experienced a two-year Yellow Vest movement, while the United States has been deeply affected by the Black Lives Matter movement. The outbreak of these two major social movements has led to a surge in public demand for institutional reform, and what led to the political crises in France and the United States is one of the great mysteries in the world today.
The Institutional Debate: China's Rise Has Become a Catalyst for Self-Reflection in Western Institutions.
Without China, the major flaws in the Western political system will be difficult for the United States and Europe to recognize. However, as the superiority of China's system continues to emerge, the United States and Europe have to re-examine their current situation. Biden sees China as a full-fledged competitor, which includes institutional competition. While Europe has taken a bystander approach to the U.S.-China rivalry, its perspective on China has gradually shifted from military threats to institutional competition.
Comparison of Chinese and Western Systems: Historical Changes and Differences in Cultural Factors.
This paper compares the historical evolution of Chinese and Western political systems. The painful experiences of Chinese history, from the Opium War to reform and opening up, prompted China to choose the socialist system. Today's institutional superiority is the result of this historical choice. In contrast, the Western political system is rooted in historical and cultural traditions, and it is difficult to make fundamental changes.
Although the United States and Europe are facing the test of the new crown epidemic, the change of the Western political system is not immediate. The article points out that the United States successfully implemented the concentration of forces to do great things in World War II and the Apollo moon landing program, but this kind of national centralized system conflicted with Western culture and institutions and ultimately failed to sustain. Now, in the face of China's rise, the United States has begun to adopt a similar model to encourage, guide and protect technological progress in key areas.
The U.S. Choice: Learn Xi China's Concentration on Doing Great Things
According to a report by Wired magazine, the United States is gradually transitioning to the model of the program to adapt to competition in the field of science and technology. The Manhattan atomic bomb program and the Apollo moon landing program are two examples of the United States' successful implementation of the concentration of efforts to do great things, but this pattern has not been sustained due to cultural and institutional conflicts.
The article points out that it is difficult for the United States to implement the ** plan model without completely changing the political system. For example, Biden**'s eight-year infrastructure plan may be opposed and constrained by Republicans. In this political system, long-term planning and implementation are difficult, and they are more unstable than China's coherent policies.
The West Fights Back Against the Belt and Road Initiative: The Rise of Alternative Construction Systems?
Against this backdrop, the United Kingdom and the United States plan to work together to crack down on China's global infrastructure construction during the G7 presidency and seek to establish an alternative construction system. This raises questions about whether the West will be able to successfully fight back against the Belt and Road Initiative. The article believes that instead of learning from China secretly, it is better to join the "Belt and Road" with an open attitude and seize the initiative through strength.
U.S.-China Rivalry: Behind the Cultural and Institutional Debate.
In general, the essence of Sino-US competition is the struggle between two cultures and two systems. While it is relatively easy to change at the artifact level, it is quite difficult to reform at the institutional and cultural levels. The article concludes by pointing out that China is becoming more assertive in this competition, while the self-confidence of the United States and Europe is declining. The United States and Europe may want to learn Xi from China, but due to cultural and institutional constraints, such Xi is not easy to succeed. Ultimately, the article stresses that the ultimate winner of the U.S.-China rivalry is likely to be China.
This article profoundly examines the current U.S.-China rivalry in the international political arena and looks at the self-reflection of the Western political system. The author presents a thought-provoking picture by citing survey data, historical comparisons, and observations of the international landscape.
First of all, the article uses the new crown epidemic as a starting point to reveal the performance of the US and Western political systems in the crisis. The pandemic has become a magnifying glass that highlights the institutional shortcomings of Western countries in the face of global challenges. The author's clever use of survey data highlights popular calls for political reform in France and the United States, raising questions about the legitimacy of Western institutions.
Secondly, through historical comparison, the article presents the evolution of Chinese and Western political systems vividly. China has gone through a series of pains, through the Westernization Movement, the overthrow of the Manchu Qing Dynasty, and then the choice of the socialist system, forming today's institutional advantages. In contrast, the Western political system is rooted in historical and cultural traditions, making it difficult to make fundamental changes. This contrast strongly underscores the continuity and adaptability of China's political system, raising concerns about the sustainability of Western institutions.
The article also discusses the strategic adjustment of the United States in the face of China's rise, especially in the field of science and technology. This change means that the United States** is trying to play a greater role in technological progress in order to maintain its technological hegemony. However, the article also points out the conflict between this model and Western culture and system, and whether the implementation of the ** system can be sustained has become a question worth pondering.
Finally, the article mentions the joint efforts of Western countries to counter China, especially in the field of infrastructure construction. The proposal of this plan not only shows the antipathy of Western countries to China's "One Belt, One Road" initiative, but also reflects their efforts to compete for the initiative on the international stage. However, the article cleverly points out that instead of learning Xi from China on the sly, it is better to join the "Belt and Road" with an open mind and seize the initiative through strength. This view is both enlightening and provokes reflection on international cooperation and competition.
Overall, this article presents a complex and changing international landscape through an in-depth analysis of the U.S.-China competition. Through the interweaving of political systems, cultural factors, and international relations, readers are led to think about the possible evolution of the future world order. This is not only an observation of international politics, but also a profound reflection on the evolution of human society.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!