Not long ago, I was intrigued by the news that the South Korean company Hyundai Motor was selling its factories in Russia to Chinese companies at low prices. This does not seem to come as a surprise, since after experiencing frequent ** bans, the development of South Korean companies in the Russian market has been greatly restricted, so they have chosen to sell their factories ahead of schedule. But it's worth mentioning that South Korean companies have also made a request to buy back within two years, which means they are still looking forward to entering the market and leaving a way back for themselves. This strategy is undoubtedly sensible, both to solve the problems facing today and to prepare for the future.
However, what is surprising is that American companies have also begun to sell to Chinese companies. Recently, Luxshare Precision announced that it has reached a factory acquisition agreement with Qorvo, a major RF manufacturer in the United States. Although the amount of the transaction was not disclosed, it does not look cheap. At the moment, the agreement has not yet been formalized and still needs regulatory approval. However, it can be seen that American companies have begun to act in a restrictive environment. So, does this mean that they intend to withdraw from the Chinese market?In fact, this is not the case, on the contrary, the American company stressed that after the ** factory, they still need to cooperate with Chinese companies to continue the layout of production capacity in the Chinese market. In other words, although the factory is sold to Chinese companies, they will still be deeply bound to the Chinese market with the help of Chinese companies' production capacity. Further, they are not only bound to the Chinese market, but more importantly, with the help of China's production capacity scale and first-class chain advantages, to enhance their competitiveness in the global market. For Lixun Precision, it can not only increase the scale of production capacity, but also get support at the technical level. On the face of it, it's a win-win deal, but are things really that simple?
Personally, I believe that American companies, like South Korean companies, may be planning the next major layout. As we all know, the current international environment is not very stable. In view of the hardline attitude of the United States, many American companies have begun to pursue diversified chain strategies, such as factory capacity or direct migration of their own chains. In fact, the US RF giant is not the first company to take such action. In August this year, Jabil Circuits, a major American manufacturer, sold the entire equity of a company to BYD for 15.8 billion yuan. Although the production capacity is **, they do not want to leave China, a market with huge revenue. According to relevant statistics, more than 40% of the revenue of American companies comes from Chinese mainland. In this case, how do they balance external factors with their own revenue?Obviously, the first factory, and in-depth cooperation with Chinese enterprises, is a good way. In this way, they can not only earn profits in the Chinese market, but also enjoy the best advantages brought by China's production capacity advantages, without worrying about the possible "sanctions" and "supply cuts" measures introduced by the United States.
In general, this time the American enterprise ** factory and cooperated with Chinese enterprises, and did not lose money. For Chinese companies, although they have not suffered any direct losses, this typical use of us as a springboard is really unbearable. In this regard, I would like to know what everyone thinks about the fact that the first factory of the American company is given to the Chinese companyPlease leave a comment, like and share, and let's ** this topic together.
In the context of the current unstable international environment, American companies began to give factories to Chinese companies, seemingly to adapt to external changes and maintain revenue, but there may also be deeper strategic considerations behind it. This operation can not only earn profits in the Chinese market, but also enhance global competitiveness with the help of China's production capacity scale and first-class chain advantages. However, this use of us as a springboard is not satisfactory for Chinese companies. We should think about how to maintain our own interests and competitive advantages in this situation and find a better path for development.