On June 24, 1939, the New Fourth Army was ordered to kill Gao Jingting, the commander of the four detachments, by mistake
On the evening of June 24, 1939, the sunset was like blood, and on the square outside Chu Laowei Village of Feidong Qinglong Factory, the soldiers of the New Fourth Army stood solemnly, loaded with guns and ammunition. Commander Ye Ting lingered around the venue, nervously checking his pocket watch and holding a pistol. At about 6 o'clock, Gao Jingting was escorted, and Chiang Kai-shek's telegram clarified everything in Ye Ting's hands. With a crisp gunshot, Gao Jingting fell, and tragedy occurred.
Ye Ting mistakenly killed the commander of the four detachments, and the chairman sighed: "It's okay if you don't kill it!."”
** Shocked to hear the news, deeply worried about this matter. The decision to execute Gao Jingting was not approved by the chairman, what is the secret behind it?The solution to this mystery can be traced back to the defection.
In mid-June 1939, the Fourth Detachment of the New Fourth Army received an order from the headquarters to leave Dabie Mountain and go to eastern Anhui. However, the rebellion of Yang Kezhi, commander of the Seventh Regiment, and Cao Yufu, political commissar, caused deep concern in the military department. In order to save the four detachments, it was decided to solve Gao Jingting, so that this wrongful killing was not approved by ***.
Gao Jingting: From the 23-year-old chairman of the Soviet ** to the legend of the Red 28th Army.
In 1929, the 23-year-old Gao Jingting was elected chairman of the Hubei-Henan-Anhui Special Economic Zone Soviet, and he vowed to live up to expectations with full trust. During the three years of the revolution, he showed his military talent without military school experience and led the Red Army left behind in the south to persist in guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines.
The Red 28th Army had only 1,000 men during the Long March, but in the next three years, they defeated 100,000 Kuomintang troops and crushed the "encirclement and suppression". Wei Lihuang and other Kuomintang generals failed repeatedly, and finally Wei Lihuang became famous in the army as a "tiger general".
Dabie Mountain Contest: Gao Jingting Red Army vs Wei Lihuang Kuomintang.
Wei Lihuang commanded more than 100,000 troops, built 10,000 pillboxes, and set up more than 40 blockade lines, but Gao Jingting's Red Army still frequently harassed Dabie Mountain. After a series of tactical failures, Wei Lihuang was completely discouraged, changed his tactics, and offered a reward of 100,000 oceans for Gao Jingting's head.
Red 28th Army: A unique hero of the Anti-Japanese War in Dabie Mountain.
In three years of arduous guerrilla warfare, Gao Jingting's Red 28th Army became the bright spot on the battlefield of resistance against Japan. In the first battle of resistance against Japan in eastern Anhui, the Red 28th Army performed excellently, breaking the myth of the "invincible" Japanese army. The victory opened the prelude to the New Fourth Army's resistance against Japan and greatly encouraged the morale of the army.
**'s doubts: Why did you mistakenly kill Gao Jingting?
** Deeply surprised to learn that Gao Jingting was killed. Why did the chairman not agree to Gao Jingting's killing, but he still couldn't save this hero of the Anti-Japanese War?Why did Gao Jingting not die well in the end?
Gao Jingting's crimes: wrongful killing of comrades and unorganized and undisciplined.
Gao Jingting has been fighting alone for a long time away from the army and monopolizing military and political power, which has led to the style of "one word", and many comrades have been wrongly killed on suspicion of collaborating with the enemy. It is difficult for the southern guerrillas to keep up with the situation in all aspects, and they send personnel to strengthen their leadership, but a situation of disorganization and discipline has been formed.
The Mystery of Wrongful Killing: Unravel the story behind Gao Jingting.
The mystery of Gao Jingting's wrongful killing reveals multiple factors, such as intra-party contradictions, the complex environment of the guerrillas, and the struggle for military leadership. The bumpy course of the New Fourth Army during the Anti-Japanese War and the unfortunate fate of Gao Jingting constitute an intricate historical picture.
Epilogue. Gao Jingting's life is full of legends, from the 23-year-old chairman of the Soviet ** to the heroic general who led the Red 28th Army, he paid a huge price in the course of the revolution. In the anti-Japanese years of the New Fourth Army, the four detachments led by Gao Jingting performed well, but behind the final wrongful killing, there was an interweaving of multiple factors such as political situation, army organization and discipline. This history has left us with deep reflection, and the legendary story of the Red 28th Army is also worthy of our eternal remembrance.
The mystery of Gao Jingting's wrongful murder is a complex and profound historical event during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in China. This article presents readers with an intricate picture of the intricate restoration of this period of history and a description of Gao Jingting and his outstanding performance of the Red 28th Army in the War of Resistance Against Japan. In commenting on this article, I want to focus on thinking from a historical perspective, from the perspective of leadership decision-making, and with a focus on the fate of individuals.
First of all, through the description of Gao Jingting's personal experience, the article shows how he developed from the chairman of the Soviet Union to the leader of the Red Army as a young revolutionary, as well as his outstanding performance in the War of Resistance against Japan. This makes the reader's reverence for Gao Jingting spontaneously arise. However, the article also revealed the dilemma faced by Gao Jingting in the guerrilla war in the south, as well as the problems of organizational indiscipline caused by long-term detachment, which laid the groundwork for the subsequent wrongful killings.
Secondly, the article emphasizes the attitude of ***, and the chairman's shock and emotion after learning that Gao Jingting was killed make readers wonder why the chairman knew that "it's okay not to kill" but couldn't stop Gao Jingting's tragedy. This shows the impact of internal contradictions and power struggles on the decision-making of the military at that time, and provides readers with a profound historical lesson.
Finally, the article analyzes the wrongful killing incident itself, emphasizing multiple factors such as political situation, military organization and discipline. This makes it easier for readers to understand that wrongful killings are not a single incident, but an interweaving of many complex issues. Such a detailed analysis enables readers to examine this period of the history of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression from the perspective of history, not only to see the sacrifice of a heroic general, but also to see the changes in China's politics and military in that particular period.
On the whole, this article successfully outlines the true face of Lushan through detailed historical restoration, vivid character description, and in-depth analysis of internal and external factors. At the same time, it provides the reader with a thoughtful historical backdrop that leads one to reflect on the important events of the era, both internally and externally, politically and militarily. Such an article is not only a restoration of history, but also an enlightenment for readers to think about history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!