The "1.00 Zero Express Station" project caused complaints from cooperative service providers, and the company responded that there was no problem of deception.
Recently, a Ms. Zheng in Zhengzhou, Henan Province broke the news to a reporter from Xiaoxiang Morning News that she participated in the investment promotion conference organized by Hunan Yiyi Zero Technology Co., Ltd. and joined the "Yiyi Zero Express Station" promotion project and paid a cooperation fee of 60,000 yuan. However, in the actual operation process, she found that the courier was reluctant to take orders, resulting in a very limited income for her. We conducted an in-depth investigation and conducted a comparative analysis of similar cases in the industry.
According to Ms. Zheng, the lecturer at that time declared at the China Merchants Conference that the "1.0 Zero Express Station" project has great potential in Zhengzhou, and can earn at least 168,000 yuan a month, or one or two million a year. This enticing commitment led Ms. Cheng to invest. The project provides an express mini-program called "Yidian Zero Station", which integrates 13 courier companies in the market and requires partner service providers to earn revenue by attracting new users and completing express orders on the platform.
However, in the actual operation, the cooperative service providers found that couriers are reluctant to accept orders on the platform, because they can get higher income by taking orders on their own mini programs, and can only get a small commission per order on the "One Point Zero Station". Ms. Zheng said that the couriers think that this practice is similar to express scalpers, and the platform uses the couriers' hard work fees to distribute to cooperative service providers.
The feedback of Ms. Zheng and several other cooperative service providers has attracted the attention of Hunan Yidian Technology. The person in charge of the company responded that the company did not have a problem of cheating, and the low income of the cooperative service providers was due to their lack of hard work. The company said that it has set up a reminder department, and if the cooperative service provider feels that it is unable to continue to operate, it can negotiate to terminate the contract and refund 50% of the cooperation fee, or it can be resolved through legal channels.
In response to this incident, Liu Ming, executive director of Hunan Ruibang Law Firm, pointed out that the termination of a contract generally needs to meet the termination conditions agreed in the contract or the termination conditions stipulated by law. In this case, if the cooperating service provider wants to terminate the contract, it can negotiate with the company to terminate the contract, in addition to providing the conditions for termination that meet the requirements of the law while providing evidence. The company should also give a more professional and responsible response to the problems of cooperative service providers.
The incident sparked widespread public discussion. Many people have questioned the cooperation model of similar express platform projects, believing that the platform should take into account the income of couriers more fairly, otherwise it will hurt their enthusiasm. Some people also believe that cooperative service providers should treat investment projects more rationally and choose carefully to avoid falling into similar difficulties.
In view of this, we call on the relevant authorities to strengthen the supervision of investment projects and provide clearer measures to protect the rights and interests of the investment projects, so as to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents. At the same time, for investors, it is necessary to remain rational, not to covet temporary high returns, to fully understand and evaluate the project, and to choose potential and sustainable projects for investment.
Finally, we should be objective about the impact of this incident. First of all, this incident has brought losses and warnings to investors, and strengthened their doubts about investment projects. Secondly, the incident has made the public question the cooperation model of the express delivery platform, and put forward thoughts on how the platform should better protect the income of couriers. Finally, this matter also shows that there are problems in the investment promotion of Yiling Technology, which needs to attract the attention and supervision of relevant departments.
Readers, what do you think about this event? Do you have any suggestions for the cooperation model of the express platform? We hope to hear from you.