Most people believe that anonymous complaints, although not always true, are believed by most people and do not have a high opinion of the whistleblower. This is the truth, and most of the conclusions that came out of the final investigation were investigated, which was slightly different from the reported situation, confirming the public's opinion. It's no wonder, because the whistleblower is not the person in charge of the case, and his task is to provide some clues to **.
In recent years, the real-name system has become less and less on the Internet, but on the Internet, you can still see the names of some professors. The recent three real-name reporting cases of teachers have made us re-examine the professional ethics of university teachers, and why after so many years of "zero tolerance", there are still some ethical problems that affect the reputation of this teaching team.
The first was that in June, on the pretext of fabricating false information, someone made a report to Professor Zheng Qiang. As a big star, there are more gossips on the Internet all of a sudden, and it seems that even Brother Qiang can't withstand such ** pressure. But it turns out that Brother Qiang deserves to be a disciplined Brother Qiang. After Brother Qiang received the report, he went to the Commission for Discipline Inspection as soon as possible, told him what had happened, and then announced to the public that he had been blackmailed and had called the police.
But even so, there are some people who don't have any doubts about Brother Qiang. In the face of such a thing, they are also helpless, how can people now believe that they are innocent?Fortunately, ** has cleared up the grievances for Brother Qiang. Lu Moumou fabricated false news on the Internet to achieve blackmail. Lu Moumou is an old fritter, last year he was sentenced to five years in prison for illegal fundraising, after he was released from prison, he still didn't give up, and began to calculate Brother Qiang again, this time it's okay, and he got into trouble again, and now he has been detained for illegal acts.
The second report, although most of it is false, also reports that the reported doctor has been punished, and nine medical workers from the respiratory and critical care medicine department of the Third Xiangya Hospital submitted a report letter to the head of the department, saying that she disregarded the quality and safety of medical care, greedy for fame and fortune, and "said nothing". The letter, which was five sheets long, spread quickly on the Internet. This was already another major incident that happened in Huaxia Hospital after Li Xiangfeng's accident, and it soon became a ruckus.
After more than three months of investigation, the local discipline inspection department finally issued an announcement, which read: "The vast majority of what the medical workers of the nine respiratory departments said are false, there is indeed something wrong with our work, we have investigated them, and ordered them to correct them immediately." Another news said that the reported person had been dealt with in many ways, which also confirmed the authenticity of the report.
The third complaint, which is currently being verified, needs to be further investigated, from December 6 to 8, Miss Huang successively posted three complaints on the Internet against the real name of Tang Moumou of Wuhan University, including marriage fraud, extramarital affairs, and receiving kickbacks and bribes from pharmaceutical merchants. The hospital also issued a notice, saying that it had immediately reported to the leadership and actively assisted the relevant institutions to carry out relevant work. The incident happened because there was a dispute in the marriage between Tang and Huang, and the two are currently engaged in a legal dispute over their respective properties, and Tang himself called the police. Wuhan University, on the other hand, said that they had learned about the incident and were verifying it.
As long as it is related to the professor, it will receive great attention. The author believes that as an outsider, he cannot judge the content of the report, and should patiently wait for the ruling of the relevant departments. However, in the current social environment, this incident has shrouded Wuhan University in a haze. As for whether Wuhan University will be able to return to what Professor Zheng Qiang did, further investigation and analysis are needed.
Three professors were anonymously complained, one of them was Professor Zheng Qiang, who was blackmailed, and the other two were all brought bad consequences to their respective universities, what does this teach us?
First, the lack of teacher ethics will not only damage the reputation of teachers, but also have adverse consequences on the quality of teaching in schools. When a teacher is reported, it is usually one-sided, which will not only hurt the reputation of the school concerned, but also the whole society of the school, even the reputation of the whole school, even the reputation of the whole school, and even the professional construction of the school. You see, although there have been results in the matter of the Xiangya Third Hospital, many people are skeptical about it. "It's no wonder that Xiangya's three majors of basic medicine, clinical medicine, and ** were not selected, because the management of the hospital was too chaotic, so they didn't have the energy to do these things. ”
Second, it is necessary to ensure the entry of the teaching contingent and strengthen the quality education of the teaching contingentThe profession of "professor" is very valuable, and some people will do whatever it takes to drill into it, so it is necessary to push the teaching staff one step further to avoid the emergence of "black sheep". It's very different from doing business. The company is all for profit, quality is secondary, as long as it can bring greater benefits to the company. Universities shoulder the dual responsibilities of education, teaching, and scientific research, and adopt a "zero tolerance" attitude towards the cultivation of moral character.
Third, teachers' moral education has its own inherent characteristics and must be adhered to for a long time. Everyone has a time to relax and wander away, which requires us to be aware at all times. Teachers should persevere in the building of their teaching ethics, go deep into the grassroots level, and resolve problems in the bud. If you talk very hard, do it very lightly, don't want to do it, don't want to do it, make it look like you, don't understand the actual problem, or turn a blind eye, there will be problems.
Ladies and gentlemen, do you have any good suggestions for this issue?
This article was originally published by "Life Lens", and plagiarism is not allowedWe do not have an account with the same name or other accountsThis information and ** are from the Internet, if there is any inappropriate, please let us know.
Please see my post (which can be found on my homepage):
Why are there such professors in universities?
Xi plagiarism at Peking University to the south: ability, cultivation, mechanism, or other issues.
Three years of fighting the epidemic: There is a kind of person who has won everyone's trust and is known as a role model teacher.
Whether secondary schools can terminate the employment contract of a teacher who has "inappropriate remarks".
One of Wu Li's decisions should be commended.