Today, we commemorate *** not only to remember and summarize his great achievements, but also to guide our future.
The times need his thoughts, the future needs his doctrines, his values and the practical guiding significance of Fang **, which will last for a long time.
The people thank him and miss him, but he needs the people to understand him and continue his unfinished business.
The most difficult cause in the history of mankind is the emancipation of the people, which is more difficult than the development of the productive forces, and he devoted his life to this magnificent cause. This is not something that can be accomplished by one generation, but needs to be passed on from generation to generation in order to be realized.
Those seemingly difficult historical tasks include national salvation, overthrow of the three mountains, the founding of New China, the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, land reform, eradication of enemy groups, elimination of bandits, pornography, gambling and drugs, socialist transformation, national industrialization, two bombs and one satellite, and return to the United Nations. These things that can only be done in one generation, or even two or three generations, he led the Chinese people to do.
He still hasn't finished it, and that really can't be done in one generation or several generations. He was not afraid to break his bones, and he worked hard to do more difficult things.
What worries him the most is that there are not many people who understand and support what he thinks is right, and there are many people who oppose it. This was the case during the First Civil Revolution, when the most serious was the failure of the Fifth Anti-Encirclement Campaign, which resulted in the loss of 90% of the forces in the Red Zone and 100% in the White Zone.
He pinned his hopes on the people, but the people could not always keep up with him. From the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, the War of Liberation, agricultural cooperativeization, socialist transformation, three anti and five anti. The later he goes, the fewer people understand him.
It's not that he's wrong, it's that his thinking is too far ahead of his time, and he sees it too many years before anyone else.
Even now, many people only regard him as a great national hero, and he naturally deserves this evaluation, but this evaluation is very incomplete in summarizing his life. Saving the nation from danger and restoring the unification of China is only a small part of his life's contributions, and it is a relatively easy part of his life's achievements.
The official evaluation of the 120th anniversary of his birth is as follows: "Comrade * is a great Marxist, a great proletarian revolutionary, strategist, and theoretician, a great pioneer of the Sinicization of Marxism, a great patriot and national hero of China in modern times, the core of the party's first generation of leading collectives, and a generation of great men who led the Chinese people to completely change their own destiny and the appearance of the country. ”
In modern times, China's great patriots and national heroes are preceded by "great Marxists, great proletarian revolutionaries, strategists, and theoreticians." Naturally, the first in line is a more important historical position.
Because *** is first and foremost a communist, and his ultimate ideal is to realize communism and realize the liberation of the people.
This is critical. It is precisely because he is first and foremost a communist that he was able to lead the party and the people to solve the problem of national salvation that countless people with lofty ideals have not been able to solve in modern times, and to achieve complete national independence.
There is an often overlooked but objective logic in this: the communists are the ones who can most thoroughly accomplish the goals of nationalism.
In modern times, there have been various currents of thought and factions that have put forward various proposals. From right to left, there is liberalism represented by Hu Shih, who became a capitulation faction in the face of aggression. There are nationalists, among whom the retro faction advocates looking for salvation solutions in the ancient Chinese culture, and the Kuomintang, represented by the Kuomintang, to learn from Germany and adopt a nationalist solution. There are also communists, that is, represented by our party.
Who has the most resolute anti-Japanese attitude?Who is the best to fight in the same ** equipment conditions?Communists for sure.
Liberalism is keen on capitulation. Hu Shi, a representative figure, opposed the students who opposed Article 21 in his early years, and ridiculed them as "patriotic madness". After "918", he advocated the recognition of Manchukuo. If you look at the current high concentration of liberals who hate the Kuomintang, you can see that their background has not changed in a hundred years.
Many nationalists are very patriotic and have the will to resist, but they are unable to mobilize the masses and change the balance of power with the aggressors from a local point of view when they are inferior to others, so they basically focus on defeat and retreat.
Only communists have the strongest will to resist and the means to change the balance of power step by step when they are inferior to others.
This method is to unleash the masses and implement the line of all-out resistance to the war. This method was the only one that worked under the conditions at that time.
How can we mobilize the masses?It is to use the way of liberating the people to stimulate the great power of the people. This kind of party has been elevated to the party's mass line, that is, on the basis of believing in the masses, relying on the masses, and serving the people wholeheartedly, the method of "coming from the masses and going to the masses" has been adopted.
The Kuomintang relied on the capture of strong men to replenish its soldiers, and the anti-Japanese base behind the enemy line was "the wife sent her husband to the battlefield, and the mother called her son to fight in the East".
Why is there such a big difference?Whether it was the use of local tyrants to divide the land, or the later use of rent and interest reduction, the common people were relieved of their burdens and saw the hope of turning over. Therefore, defeating little Japan and defending the country is the same as defending the liberated areas and defending the fruits of victory and living space for oneself. During the same period, the common people of Henan disarmed Tang Enbo's army, because they felt that their performance was no better than that of the Japanese devils.
Under the leadership of the party, the liberated areas politically resolved the issues of "for whom the War of Resistance Against Arms" and "for whom to fight." This embodies a series of basic principles: politics is a concentrated reflection of the economy, and war is the politics of bloodshed.
By the same token, with the exception of the socialist Soviet Union, no country in Europe could withstand the blitzkrieg of Nazi Germany. The mobilization power of the military and civilians of the Soviet Union is simply incomparable with that of Britain, France and other capitalist countries.
Only communists are best able to solve the historical problem of nationalism's salvation.
Continuing to take China as an example, our Communist Party can carry out an all-out war of resistance, while the Kuomintang can only take a one-sided war of resistance.
The one-sided War of Resistance cannot change the passive situation in which "China's guns are inferior to people, artillery is inferior to people, education and training are inferior to people, machines are inferior to people, and factories are inferior to people", and it cannot make up for the gap between the hard power of agricultural countries and industrial countries. Therefore, there is no future, there is no hope of victory, only foreign aid is relied upon, but foreign aid is not obliged to help the Chinese drive out the invaders, and the Chinese need to pay a great price for exchange.
The asking price of the United States was to demand that Chiang Kai-shek sign a series of ** treaties, according to which American goods could be dumped against China, which was tantamount to sealing China's industrialization. The asking price of the Soviet Union was to establish a foreign railway, to increase the number of companies and Port Arthur, and to have the right to jointly operate the Middle East and South Manchurian railways.
Therefore, the result of the one-sided War of Resistance led by the Kuomintang was that although China was the victor of the War of Resistance, it lost power and land, and the victory was bitter. Moreover, Japan is gone, but the United States is coming. Had it not been for the overthrow of the Kuomintang, they would have turned China from a dominant colony under Japanese occupation into a ** colony under American control.
Only by communists can we solve the problem of China's national salvation and achieve complete national independence.
Because only communists regard the liberation of the people as the goal of struggle;Whoever can promote the emancipation of the people can mobilize the masses;Whoever can mobilize the masses will be able to find the strength to solve the problem of national salvation.
Chiang Kai-shek could not understand this formula. Even if he did, he would not have solved the problem according to the answers of the communists (although Chiang had also disguised himself as a leftist and served as an honorary member of the Comintern).
The Kuomintang ruled on the basis of the big landlords and big compradors who oppressed the people, so Chiang Kai-shek proposed before the outbreak of "918" that "if you die in Japan, you can be a slave to the country."Die in **, and you can't be a slave. This is enough to explain the root cause of Chiang Kai-shek's non-resistance and passive resistance.
In the final analysis, the national question is still a class question. In the final analysis, the different attitudes of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party towards the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression were determined by the classes they represented.
The reason is very simple: if China loses the country, it is the workers and peasants who bear the main costs, so the army that represents the interests of the workers and peasants will be the most resolute in the war of resistance. The Kuomintang represents the class attribute of the interests of big landlords and big capital, and even if China dies, they can still find a living space and continue to be a superior man, so proceeding from their own interests, the war is a hesitant attitude.
The will to resist Japan was not resolute, and it was unable to mobilize the masses to change the balance of power with the aggressors, so the Kuomintang's national salvation line could not succeed.
The political forces representing the other classes, that is, the middle forces, are also unable to solve the question of national salvation, because their programmes are equally incapable of promoting the emancipation of the people and thus mobilizing the masses.
As far as our party is concerned, as long as there is correct leadership, it is only a small goal to solve the problem of national salvation by promoting the liberation of the people. Moreover, because they were resolutely anti-imperialist, anti-feudal, and anti-comprador, they decided that the national independence they led the people to achieve was the most complete.
Chinese should be glad that not only has a communist party, but also has a *** in this party to make this party mature quickly.
Therefore, today we are faced with the issue of national rejuvenation, and patriotic people should not be satisfied with being just a nationalist.
One hundred years ago, the communists solved the problem of national salvation by promoting the liberation of the people. Today, 100 years later, national rejuvenation should be achieved by promoting the liberation of the people.
At the present stage, the phased goal of the people's liberation is at least to share the fruits of development economically, achieve common prosperity, and enjoy the right to be masters of the country politically.
This requires institutional adherence to the basic principles of scientific socialism. On the path to realization, we should use socialist modernization to achieve the goal of national rejuvenation.
In terms of ideology, we should regard patriotism as our ideological bottom line, and communism as our ideological high ground. In this way, we have two sharp weapons to deal with the "universal" values of the West. This system in the West was originally suppressed by communism, and the value system that served capital could not achieve communism that served the laborers.
To achieve national rejuvenation by promoting the people's liberation, to take national rejuvenation as the phased goal of the people's liberation, to achieve a higher degree of people's liberation is a long-term goal, and to realize communism is the ultimate goal and the highest program. With a sense of direction, the momentum for development is stronger, the people's hearts are more united, and the resistance is smaller.
This requires fundamentally adhering to the socialist road that the generation helped us find, and adhering to the ideas of Marxism-Leninism, especially great men.
The commemoration of a great man should not only be used as a reminiscence of the past, but also as a way of inheritance, so it is very important and crucial to understand his old man's thoughts and practices in its entirety.
Especially now, although our comprehensive national strength is booming day by day, and the strength of our main external adversary is seriously declining, our main internal adversary, as an ally of the United States, is still so strong. In the economic sphere in particular, neoliberalism has a particularly strong force in academia.
The ideological struggle in China is only the manifestation of this game.
These internal forces have recently markedly quickened the pace and intensified their efforts in inducing us to carry out financial liberalization and the privatization of state-owned enterprises; not only have there been many voices advocating the implementation of complete free currency convertibility, but they have also used such propositions as "no longer distinguishing between ownership systems," "state-owned enterprises are a supplement to the private sector," and "the market economy is the private economy" to revise the basic economic system and the dominant position of public ownership as stipulated in the constitution and move our national foundation.
How can this be endured?
The main battlefield launched by the United States against us is the economy, and their allies are also focusing on opening up our gaps in the economic aspect, mainly using the means of ideological warfare to coordinate with the economic warfare of the United States and help the United States achieve the goals that cannot be achieved in economic warfare.
In this case, it is not enough to fight back with nationalism. It is necessary to x-ray their claims, whether overt or implicit, with the minds of Marxist-Leninist and Nephilim.
We have said many times that ideological warfare is the last war and the most difficult war to fight. Ideological warfare is different from financial warfare, in the face of a strong enemy, the best tactic is to attack, and offense is the final defense. The offensive and defensive of the mind is either the east wind overpowering the west wind, or the west wind overpowering the east wind, and there is no intermediate state.
** Thought is used well, it is really invincible, invincible, that is the precious wealth he left us. Back then, he used this ideological system as a guide to complete so many miracles in the world.
100 help plan