Saw news of dog lovers complaining about sled dogs.
I have some bad feelings in my heart.
If nothing else, the scenic spot will definitely not let the sled dogs continue to work.
And the sled dog that lost his job, there may be only one end.
After all, a sled dog that has lost the meaning of making money can only be reduced to a dish on the table.
It's brutal, but it's also a reality.
Some people say, isn't this still a matter for dog owners?
Dog owners are abusing dogs by letting them sled.
Isn't it more cruel to send a dog to death if you don't pull a sled than abusing a dog?
All the problems are in the dog owner, and the dog owner is too ruthless.
Why do you accuse us dog lovers?
It sounds like it's logically fine.
But the problem is that things for dog lovers are illogical.
Dog lovers only need to tap on the keyboard online to express their dissatisfaction.
Then forced the scenic spot to cut off the job of the dog owner, and at the same time cut off the work of the dog.
Their personas on the Internet [dog lovers] have been erected, and they are doing a good job.
As for the rest?
Anyway, they don't need to pay for it.
They don't pay anything, they only need others to pay.
So, their fundamental logic is problematic.
They are only responsible for blaming others online, and do not bear the consequences and responsibilities of accusation.
And after they finished their personal moral performance, they walked away.
What happened to the sled dogs next, they couldn't see it out of sight and didn't bother, so naturally it ......
If someone says they killed the dog, they can say that the dog owner is the problem.
Logical nose rings, they can always be invincible.
All that remained was the fur of the sled dog, and the sigh of the dog's owner.
Is this the so-called dog lover?