In other words, what is the difference between a woman's breasts and a woman's face, I don't think there is any difference.
If you have to say that it is a difference, it seems that it is from a male point of view, and it is different in the eyes of men, for example, breasts are more erotic than faces.
I think the design of modern underwear is to turn a woman's breasts into an erotic look in the eyes of men, and it is against the law to lift a woman's breasts into a round and unnatural look.
When I see the shape of a woman's breasts when she is not wearing underwear, I naturally think, "Well, just like my breasts, they are also the natural form of a woman's body, but it's just a body."
But when I see the furrow between a woman's breasts and the rounded northern hemisphere, I suddenly have lustful thoughts, and my lower limbs will stand upright.
Probably because the form of those two things is too abrupt, resulting in a sense of novelty.
I even thought that if all the women on the road were in a vacuum, there would be less pornography.
The so-called erotic probably originated from the unnatural shape.
This feeling is like seeing legs as white as paper, even if the owner of these legs, her figure is not very good, but as long as these legs don't look real, it will immediately arouse my desire.
For example, when your legs are like the legs of a plastic mannequin in a shopping mall, slender and straight, reflecting the sheen of plastic in the light, I will be just as excited when I see it.
I love photographing plastic models' legs.
In fact, the study of the shape of women's breasts should also be useful in portrait photography.
I said at the beginning that a woman's face is the same as a woman's breasts, just a part of the body.
Therefore, when I see those so-called ** female portrait photography, which is to put on erotic underwear, or expose the hemisphere**, I feel very low-level.
It's not vulgar, it's low.
Chest and face, I think they are equal, wearing erotic underwear, it seems bold, but it is still conservative.
This is half-covered and half-exposed, it's just that men will watch, but it has nothing to do with **.
Those men who praise such **yes** probably have other intentions, maybe they are really vulgar.
What do I understand as ** portrait photography?
The photography of the person who shoots the ** is the portrait photography of the **. 」
A group of **, can you turn a person who is not ** into a ** person, add or subtract a few pieces of clothing, can you become a ** image?
Maybe it's just because I feel abrupt, This is a dress I haven't worn, so bold, I must be very ** in the camera, right?!』
In that case, why don't you put your legs inside the mall model's legs and take pictures, it's weird, but it may look erotic.
I'm interested in photographing the legs of plastic models. - Oh again.
They (the plastic model's legs) shine so unnaturally in the sun, but they are very human-like, but they transcend the curves of people.
When there are characteristics on a person's body that are not like the human being, that's what I think is erotic, woman, the less you look like a person, the more erotic you are.