Recently, a hot question has aroused discussion among netizens:Should the heating fee be paid according to the actual area or the shared area?
Many netizens expressed their indignation, obviously the area of the house is only 100 square meters, but the property fee and heating fee are calculated according to the construction area, what is the reason?
In fact, all original sins are:Pooled area has been prevalent in the real estate industry for a long time.
Nowadays, most communities have staircases and public entertainment facilities, which will occupy a part of the shared area. In contrast, the shared area of the elevator room is much smaller, but the shared ratio of the elevator room is very high, generally between 20-30%.
Recently, more and more people have expressed dissatisfaction with the shared area, and they want to be able to eliminate this unreasonable charging method. They thought to themselves, will one day, they really be able to say goodbye to the "shared area"?
Why is it that in 2024, there will be a voice of "canceling the shared area"?
The topic of "canceling the public pool" has attracted a lot of people's attention, and the reason why the call is surging is actually because the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued the "Notice on Soliciting Public Opinions on 38 Full-scale Engineering Construction Specifications such as the "Urban and Rural Water Supply Project Specifications", and publicly solicited opinions on the Internet. These specifications cover 13 engineering projects and 25 engineering projects that are common to them.
Of these norms, the mostThe hotly debated item 10 is the "Residential Project Specification (Draft for Comments)"., Part 2 of this specification4.Article 6 states:Residential buildings should be traded on the basis of the usable area of the suite.
As soon as the regulations came out, it was enough to see that it stirred up a thousand waves with one stoneThe shared area is regarded as a "heart disease" in the eyes of the people.
Since the beginning of the era of commercial housing in 1998, buyers have had to bear the share of the common floor area, which is a long-standing problem, and the scope of the share has not been clearly limited, which is really unacceptable.
You can only buy a house according to what they say about the shared area, and the actual area you can live in depends on luck.
In short, the shared area includes many parts, such as halls, halls, corridors, aisles, elevators, stairs, elevator shafts, elevator machine rooms, garbage chutes, pipe shafts, pump rooms, fire escapes, etc., as well as property management rooms.
So, what proportion of the shared area generally accounts for?Depending on the type of building, in general, 10%-20% of low-rise buildings without elevators, 20%-30% of ordinary houses with elevators, and 30%-40% of apartments with elevators. However, since there is no regulation on the maximum percentage of the shared area, we may encounter a higher situation than this.
are calling for the abolition of the pooled area, so is it possible to cancel the pooled area?
Pooled area is a controversial topic, and some experts believe that even if the pooled area is canceled, developers will increase prices in other aspects, so it doesn't matter whether it is canceled or not. However, the existence of the shared area does bring a lot of trouble to home buyers, and it involves huge problems of benefit distribution and transparency, which may lead to various chaos, such as the public pool being sold privately, and property fees and other fees being charged many times.
There have been calls for the abolition of pooled area, but there are also objections.
In fact, it is not an easy thing to cancel the shared area, it involves the order of the real estate market, the fluctuation of housing prices, the interests of developers, the rights and interests of buyers, the management of property and other factors, which need to have full demonstration and supporting measures, and cannot be one-size-fits-all. Moreover, the abolition of the shared area is not necessarily the best solution, it may bring some new problems, such as the unit price of the house will be **, the developer will reduce the construction of public facilities, and the buyers will feel unfair.
After all, until there is no better solution, the elimination of pooled area may cause more problems. Recently, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has also issued a draft for comments, proposing to calculate the residential area according to the usable area of the suiteWhile this is only a recommendation, it may be implemented in the future.
Since it is possible to cancel, can people who have already bought a house be compensated?
The answer is: no.
Even if the shared area is really abolished in the future, it is unlikely that people who have already bought a house will receive any form of compensation. Because, when they first bought the house, they traded according to the construction area (including the shared area), which was legal and compliant, and did not violate any laws and regulations. Moreover, they also enjoy some of the conveniences and services brought by the shared area, such as elevators, stairs, foyers, fire escapes, etc. Therefore, there is no reason for them to demand compensation from the developer or **.
Of course, people who have already bought a house are not for nothing. If the shared area is abolished, then the property fees, heating fees and other fees they pay in the future may be calculated according to the actual usable area, rather than the floor area. In this way, they can save some money and be more reasonable and fair.
The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has always been cautious about the abolition of the shared area. According to the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the shared area is a complex issue, involving the stability of the real estate market, the quality of housing, the interests of home buyers and other factors, and cannot be generalized or one-size-fits-all.
In short, the shared area is an old topic, and it is also a hot topic, which affects the hearts of thousands of home buyers. At present, there is no formal decision and document on the abolition of the pooled area, which is only a suggestion for soliciting opinions, and further demonstration and improvement are needed.
Even if the shared area is really abolished in the future, there will be no compensation for those who have already bought a house, and it will only have a certain impact on their property fees and other expenses. Therefore, buyers do not need to worry or expect too much, but should look at this issue rationally, pay attention to their actual interests, and protect their legitimate rights and interests.
List of high-quality authors