People often judge people by their appearance, although we now understand that physical appearance does not determine a person's character. However, in some specific contexts, people tend to categorize people who are identities. One teacher firmly believed in this principle and divided parents into different personality levels based on their WeChat profile pictures. However, this practice has caused dissatisfaction among parents and netizens, and has aroused heated discussions.
The teacher believes that WeChat avatars can intuitively reflect a parent's preferences and personality, so he categorized parents according to different avatar types. He believes that parents who use **hua** advocate beauty but look average;Parents who use funny avatars (such as donkey, Monkey King, etc.) are the least willing to communicate with them;Parents who use gentle backs** belong to the system and are more accessible;Parents who use money-seeking avatars have good family conditions, but they don't have big ambitions and want to carry out some small projects;Parents who use animal pet avatars are relatively wealthy;Parents who use funny avatars (such as Stephen Chow) don't have anything serious to do in a day;Parents who use text avatars drink more chicken soup;Parents who use landscape avatars have fewer things to do and have a larger pattern;A typical middle-aged girl who uses a beauty ** type of avatar for parents, pays attention to feelings and likes to communicate;Parents who use parent-child avatars are more willing to share their children's growthParents who use professional avatars talk a lot and don't know how to suppress each other.
However, this act sparked outrage among netizens. Netizens believe that the teacher's vain guessing of the parent's personality based on the avatar is not in-depth communication, and it is wrong to directly qualitatively do so. They say that it is the individual's freedom to like and hate who in everyday life. But if it's a teacher, it's a bit inappropriate to label the parents of students.
However, not everyone expressed outrage at the teacher's actions. Some believe that there is some justification in the teacher's actions. They believe that a person's avatar can reflect their personality state and preferences to a certain extent. However, there are two sides to everyone's personality, and a person cannot be judged based on their avatar alone. For example, parents who use funny avatars can be very easy-going, optimistic, and sunny. And describing the pattern of people who use landscape avatars as big and less is also a weakening of them. These people believe that the teacher's mistake is that he does not see the strengths of the parents, only the shortcomings. He stares at the shortcomings and magnifies them so that the parents only get worse.
As a teacher, you should have eyes to discover beauty, and have a pair of eyes that can see the shining points of students and parents, rather than communicating with colored glasses. However, there are also those who tend to believe that the teacher made such a statement in order to attract attention. In his day-to-day work, he should be able to communicate correctly and equally with parents. For the anger of netizens, they believe that there is no need to be overly strong, because no one is flawless. Even teachers are inevitably prone to mistakes and negligence. The key is to be able to identify your mistakes and correct them in a timely manner.
In my opinion, this teacher's behavior is indeed inappropriate, but it is not as serious as netizens imagined. He lacks a comprehensive understanding and an eye for beauty, and only sees the shortcomings of his parents. People's personalities and preferences are multi-layered and multi-faceted, and conclusions cannot be made simply through a WeChat avatar. However, it is also unrealistic to expect every teacher to be flawless in the context of limited teachers. It is important that we know how to be tolerant and understanding, to be able to grasp the strengths of our teachers, and to give them opportunities to improve.
Moreover, in this age of information, everyone has the right to express their views and opinions. We should conduct full discussions and exchanges on the premise of equality, respect and rationality. For some unreasonable or wrong remarks, we can criticize and suggest in a rational way instead of being overly angry and attacking. Only through mutual understanding and respect can we do better in our respective positions and jointly promote the progress and development of society.
In short, this incident once again reminds us that we should not judge people by their appearance, and we should not judge a person's personality and preferences based on a WeChat avatar one-sidedly. Everyone deserves to be treated equally, respected and understood. As educators, we should know how to face different people and things with an open, tolerant and rational attitude, and truly lead by example to cultivate students' independent thinking ability and aesthetics. In this way, we can create a harmonious and inclusive educational environment and cultivate more high-quality talents.