If you want to convince me, you must first come up with practical success stories. So far, there have been no successful cases of anti-involution by cracking down on education and training.
In South Korea, for example, a law was enacted in 1980 prohibiting all remedial classes.
At first, the people at the bottom cheered, but when they came to their senses, they found that this would only make their children not "come out", but those rich and noble children had no impact. The reason is simple, rich people can buy expensive 1-to-1 tutors to come to their homes, and they have no place to make up for their children.
The data also confirms that in the years after the ban on make-up classes, most of the students admitted to South Korea's elite schools came from wealthy families. An initiative to promote equity in education has created even greater inequality. As a result, public opposition grew, and the ban was repeatedly relaxed until 2000, when it was completely abolished. The reason given by the court was that it was a violation of human rights - that everyone has the right to pursue education.
And unlike South Korea, it is Singapore.
Singapore not only does not prohibit make-up classes, but also strongly encourages them. Public schools have half a day of classes every day, and the remaining half day allows children to find a place to make up for their own classes. If it's not good, make up for it. This practice has made many people become make-up teachers, and finally caused the involution of the education and training industry - the cost of make-up classes has been declining, and it has been reduced to the point that ordinary people can accept.
This confirms one point, and it is also a great experience of the Chinese in water management from ancient times to the present - easy to loosen and not to block.