A few days ago, I swiped an article by Mr. Sima Nan, in which Mr. Sima Nan seemed to be telling that he was labeled as an "ultra-leftist" and very aggrieved.
But between the lines, what grievances can you see? It's clearly proud.
It is said that as a grass farmer and a junior, I am not qualified to participate in the "line" dispute of several bigwigs. But after thinking about it, the grass people also have their own vision, cognition, and opinions, although they are bottom-level thinking, they will be more specific than the bigwigs.
My major is automation, and today as an automation engineer, I would like to share my opinion.
In ocean-going ships, there is an extremely important set of equipment - autopilots.
After the route is determined, when the ship deviates due to wind direction, water flow and other reasons, the operating system will be automatically triggered through the signal transmitted by the compass to automatically correct the course.
There is a key point, or sensitivity. If the correction of the direction is too frequent, it is easy to reduce the service life of the execution machinery, and it is not safe, many times, nature will automatically correct the direction, so the really clever engineer will adjust the sensitivity to the most appropriate position, this "degree" is difficult to master, but there is a standard.
Most importantly, there is also a collision avoidance radar to prevent collisions with unexpected obstacles that are not marked on the chart. When the collision avoidance radar has a strong warning, the system alone is not so reliable, and manual intervention is often required; Because of the lag between the course and the rudder, or inertia, the helmsman often hits the rudder to the "extreme left" or "extreme right" when steering, and the technical term is called left full rudder and right full rudder.
If it is not "extreme left" or "extreme right" at this time, but one way to the dark, the shipwreck and death will become inevitable.
In my opinion, the principle of autopilot is also applicable at the level of statecraft.
If we compare the major policy to the route, then the decision-maker can be compared to the "compass" to accurately give the direction signal; Discipline inspection and supervision organs are "radars" that detect unknowable dangers at any time; Laws and regulations are "sensitivity standards" to reduce internal friction on the premise of ensuring the consistency of the general direction; "Nature" is the whole society, the synthesis of the human heart and human nature; Other departments are equivalent to various components in the autopilot operating system, complementing each other and performing their own duties.
When the route is determined, it is necessary to set small goals one by one, and set the course of the stage according to the small goals.
However, the course to reach the target can not be a straight line, within the standard range, left and right, there is no right or wrong, when the yaw exceeds the standard, the system automatically corrects.
If you encounter an emergency, you need to avoid it quickly, and you don't need to consider the "extreme left" and "extreme right", and safety is the first element.
In this case, do you still need to struggle with left and right?
What's more, Mr. Sima Nan is not a "helmsman", just a "horn", at best a "sensor".
We must admit that the development of reform and opening up to the present day is generally benign. The "steering means" of the extreme left and the extreme right are not yet used, but the "shouting" is still necessary, and it can be regarded as acting as a radar.
In this regard, I greatly admire Mr. Sima Nan's courage to speak out.
A few days ago, I wrote a few articles, and many netizens said that Sima Nan sent me to attack Academician He Zuoxiu.
I want to tell them: you're wrong. List of high-quality authors I have followed Sima Nan, as well as Academician He Lao and Mr. Hu Xijin, but I have my own understanding of their views, no one can easily change my mind, and Mr. Sima Nan will not be bored enough to send me, a grass people, to attack anyone.
The reason why I wrote those articles is because I am extremely disgusted with the words and deeds that deny traditional Chinese culture, if I feel that there is "dross" in traditional culture, I can just take it out, just talk about things, and I can't generalize and talk nonsense.
Cultural aggression is more terrible than any other invasion.
The "blood and bones" here are not only blood, but also culture, and the "soul" of the nation.
The changes of the times, the development of society, the progress of thought, the only immutable thing is the soul of the Chinese nation.
Finally, I quoted a poem of the great man: "The right way in the world is the vicissitudes of life", and encouraged Mr. Sima Nan, Mr. Hu Xijin and Academician He Zuoxiu.