I believe that everyone has their own cognition and opinion on the Book of Changes. This classic work, which represents the wisdom of ancient China, has sparked countless discussions and controversies. Some see it as a precious spiritual treasure, while others are skeptical of its views. Let's take a fresh look at this historical legacy, the place of traditional wisdom in modern science.
Conventional wisdom: the value of the I Ching.
As one of the ancient Chinese classics, the Book of Changes is known as the first of the Six Classics. It contains not only ancient wisdom, but also rich ideas and depictions of the laws of nature. However, as the times have changed, some people have begun to question the ideas, especially scholars like Nobel laureate Yang Zhenning, who have openly questioned some of his views, causing confusion and novelty.
Yang Zhenning's question.
As a well-respected physicist, Yang Zhenning questioned the views of the I Ching, arguing that some of its ideas are no longer applicable to contemporary society. His views have sparked a lot of discussion, after all, the I Ching contains a philosophical perspective that conflicts with the physical perspective represented by Yang Zhenning. But on the other hand, Yang Zhenning has also caused some controversy in his personal life, especially his marriage to a graduate student, although it has been questioned, this relationship has lasted for a long time under the test of time.
Scholar's view: Ji Xianlin's view on the Book of Changes.
As a master of Chinese studies, Ji Xianlin has a unique insight into the Book of Changes. He believes that the Book of Changes is a summary of theoretical books, although it reveals the principle of simplicity, but has a positive guiding role in production and life. His views open new doors to new understandings and re-examine this classic that has existed for thousands of years.
The future of conventional wisdom.
With the development of the times, the theoretical works of ancient China gradually spread to Western countries and were valued by many Western scientists. Some scholars even believe that the I Ching contains far more theoretical ideas than some of the ideas in the West. This affirmation of traditional wisdom has led to more people thinking about its value.
Revisiting the I Ching
As a discipline that integrates astronomy and philosophy, I Ching represents the pinnacle of ancient Chinese science. Although some people have questioned it, we should also treat it in an objective and impartial manner. Perhaps in the future, as people's understanding of it continues to deepen, we will have a new understanding of the Book of Changes.
Epilogue. 
The I Ching is an ancient classic full of traditional wisdom, and the controversy and discussion between it and modern science is the product of the collision between tradition and modernity, classics and reality. We should look at conventional wisdom with an open mind, and perhaps it contains wisdom and revelations that we have not yet discovered.
This article re-examines the status and controversy of the Book of Changes in contemporary times, hoping to inspire more people to think and explore this traditional wisdom.
The I Ching has always been a controversial topic, and the article you present is in-depth about this controversy. The article discusses the value and controversy of the Book of Changes from different perspectives, and fully expresses respect and reflection on this ancient classic.
First of all, the article mentions that the Book of Changes, as a classic of ancient Chinese wisdom, has a rich record of ancient thought and natural laws. However, as the times have changed, whether these views are still applicable to modern society has become a point of controversy. In particular, the questioning of well-known scholars such as Yang Zhenning has brought people new thinking. This skepticism and questioning of traditional wisdom has sparked a discussion about the meaning and practical applicability of the I Ching, and has led people to re-examine the classic.
Secondly, the article mentions Ji Xianlin's views on the Book of Changes. He believes that the Book of Changes has a positive guiding role in production and life, giving people more knowledge and understanding of this work. This affirmation and reinterpretation of traditional wisdom has opened the door to new cognition for people to re-understand this thousand-year-old classic.
The article also touches on the evaluation of the I Ching by Western scholars, arguing that its theoretical views even surpass some Western thoughts. This cross-cultural recognition provides more room for thinking about the value of traditional wisdom, and makes people think more about its value and significance.
Overall, this article is a comprehensive and in-depth account of the I Ching controversy**, showing respect and reflection on traditional wisdom. There is still a need for more discussion and reflection on the significance of this ancient classic in modern society. After all, the collision of tradition and modernity, the blend of classics and reality, is an important issue that we need to face and think about.
The I Ching has always been a controversial topic, and this article is an in-depth discussion of the conflict between traditional wisdom and modern science, which has aroused my great interest. As can be seen from the article, there are differences in attitudes towards the I Ching, and Nobel laureate Yang Zhenning's questioning adds a new color to this discussion.
First of all, the article fully expounds the value of the I Ching, emphasizing its status as an ancient Chinese classic, containing a wealth of ideas and descriptions of the laws of nature. This makes me wonder if ancient culture can provide valuable spiritual wealth to modern society. For the well-known Tang and Song poems and the enlightening Zhou Yi Bagua, I began to re-examine whether they still have practical guiding significance today.
Mr. Yang Zhenning's point of view adds a lot to the whole article. As a prominent physicist, he questioned the I Ching, arguing that some of its ideas were no longer applicable to contemporary society. This point of view from scientists makes me wonder whether conventional wisdom is still relevant in today's fast-paced world of technology. The difference in the views of experts in different fields on the same issue shows the multifaceted and subjective nature of knowledge.
Mr. Ji Xianlin's views provide a new perspective for this discussion. As a master of Chinese culture, he believes that the Book of Changes summarizes a series of theories and plays a positive guiding role in people's production and life. This made me wonder if traditional wisdom still has room for application in modern society, and whether it still has value beyond time and space.
The article concludes by emphasizing that the Book of Changes is a discipline that integrates astronomy and philosophy, representing the pinnacle of ancient Chinese science. This affirmation of traditional wisdom has led me to think more about the exchange and integration of Chinese and Western cultures. After all, Kenneth and other Western scientists have a high opinion of the I Ching, which makes me feel that in the pluralistic exchange of cultures, traditional Chinese wisdom may be able to exert greater influence on a global scale.
Throughout the text, the controversy over the I Ching is not evaded, but presented to the reader in a dialectical way. This objective and fair attitude made me feel more room for thinking, and at the same time, I realized that when we treat traditional wisdom, we need to have both a historical perspective and a rational thinking about modern science.
To sum up, this article profoundly examines the status of the I Ching in contemporary society, presenting a multi-dimensional and multi-level discussion picture through the views of experts in different fields. For me, this is not only a new understanding of traditional wisdom, but also a deep reflection on cultural integration and scientific development. I hope that in the future, there will be more articles like this that delve into the relationship between tradition and modernity, so that we can better understand and cherish our cultural heritage.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!