There is a paradox: grassroots cadres are disgusted and tired of leaving traces, but they are very willing to leave traces. Why is this happening?Because, the traces are like stinky tofu, it smells stinky and tastes so good!
Leaving traces, is it formalism?Perhaps in work practice, many people think of formalism when they think of leaving traces. This is the same as thinking of "form" and thinking of "formalism". Like the form, there is nothing wrong with the trace, but with the addition of the word "ism", the meaning of the mark and the beauty of the form will lose its original purpose and value.
When it comes to leaving traces, everyone will think of a slogan: "Scratch the iron with traces, step on the stone to leave a mark", which seems to say that any work needs to be "traced". Some people who are keen on "leaving traces" seem to have found the "source" support, but in fact, this is a misunderstanding and distortion of this slogan. The phrase itself is intended to make our work more pragmatic rather than formal.
A very important purpose of leaving traces is to leave traces of work, so that we can understand the work status and work effect at that time, which is helpful for inspection and review, and prevents some work from passing the buck and throwing the blame irresponsibly. From this point of view, traces and formalism do not go hand in hand.
Especially with today's refined and standardized governance, emphasizing process management, the focus of the higher-ups on the township assessment is whether the procedures are standardized, and the important way to check whether the procedures are standardized is to check the relevant archives, after all, there is no basis for words.
Under the pressure of assessment, leaving traces establishes a means of avoiding responsibility.
In the post-tax era, the resources are sinking, and the township is in a state of multi-center tasks, which means that multi-center assessments, especially with refined management and process management, have formed an abnormal state of "thousands of knives above, and a head below", and leaving traces has naturally become the only choice to keep the "head". There are two problems with this:
First, in the practice of the grass-roots level, in order to grasp the situation of the work at the grass-roots level, the higher authorities must and must also carry out inspection, supervision, assessment, supervision, and even accountability of the work of townships and towns, which is a common means adopted in order to better implement the policy. Inspection, supervision, assessment, and supervision must have a grasp, a standard, and a specific "thing", or it must be touched and seen by the superiors. These grasps are the so-called various ledgers, meeting minutes, and various first-class materials of the township, and these "grasps" are used to consider whether the township work is "in place". In this way, the township has a "trace" requirement from the superiors.
Second, leaving traces is also a means for township and town cadres to evade responsibility. This shows that the work of grassroots cadres is very large and very detailed, but the pressure of assessment is very great, and under the constraints of the objective conditions of limited personnel, limited resources, limited power, and limited ability in townships and towns, it is very difficult for townships and towns to effectively carry out all kinds of work in an all-round way, that is to say, many tasks cannot be truly carried out, implemented, and completed well.
At the same time, coupled with some work, it does not conform to the actual local situation, and the township does not have the "native gene" that can work well.
Therefore, in the face of the strong assessment pressure of the superiors, in order to avoid responsibility, the township can only prove by leaving traces that the township is really working in accordance with the requirements of the superiors, and the reason why it is not effective is not the responsibility of the township, so that the responsibility can be thrown out, so as to achieve the role of avoiding responsibility.
It can be an exaggerated assumption that the leader asks you to go to the moon and get some lunar soil yourself. You successfully completed the mission and came back with the moon soil. But, who can prove that you took the moon soil from the moon?At this time, you have a ** that takes soil on the moon, and it's good.
Small probability events, although they do not occur often, but as long as they occur, the territory must bear the first responsibility and will definitely be dealt with. In order to guard against these small probability incidents and cope with inspections at all levels, township and town cadres have no choice but to make ledgers, take all kinds of photographs, and report all kinds of tables.
For example, in the prevention of minor drowning, the assessment standard should have been whether there was a juvenile drowning incident in the territory, but as long as a drowning incident occurred, all the efforts would be in vain. However, the superiors can't keep an eye on the "people who do the work" all the time, so they can only check the **, the ledger, and check the state before and now. In order to avoid accountability due to drowning incidents, townships and towns must also protect their heads through various traces. Therefore, all kinds of "traces" make everyone happy.
At the same time, in various fields such as production safety, environmental protection, carbon monoxide poisoning prevention, etc., we can see all kinds of "traces", although they are all "traces", but they cannot be killed with a stick, some traces are necessary, the key is "real work".
In order to avoid responsibility, the township has done a lot of work to leave traces, wasting a lot of time and resources, but it has not played a big role in promoting the work. Work for the sake of work, leave marks for the sake of leaving traces, work loses its original appearance.
At the same time, with the institutionalization and literacy of the villages, the wind of leaving traces is gradually blowing in the countryside. Rural areas, as the last mile, need more practical results, real changes, and real development, rather than a paragraph of text and a line of numbers on A4 paper.
Traces are like stinky tofu, although it tastes delicious, it can't change its smell!
Niche text, plagiarism is prohibited. Welcome to follow,**