The conflict between Israel and Palestine has always been in the spotlight, but the recent Israeli-Kazakh interim ceasefire agreement has an important question behind it – who has subdued Israel?Through analysis, it can be seen that the twists and turns that Israel experienced before reaching a ceasefire agreement actually reflect the influence of the forces behind it on Israel.
First, the international community's pressure and criticism of Israel has been increasing. As a result of the controversy and condemnation of Israel's actions in this conflict, a growing number of countries are exerting pressure on Israel to cease its aggression and to comply with the demands of the international community. Among them, Turkey is particularly resolute in its statement, planning to form a "united front" with Islamic countries and Latin American countries to sever diplomatic relations with Israel. In addition, the South African parliament passed a resolution calling for the closure of the Israeli embassy in the city of Pretoria and the suspension of diplomatic relations with Israel. These initiatives show that the international community has moved away from turning a blind eye to Israel's actions and is taking action to put pressure on Israel.
Second, Israel's military superiority is being challenged. Despite Israel's military strength and reliance on U.S. support, the Israeli military has not been able to destroy Hamas's forces as it hoped, but has exposed its own combat effectiveness. This is not only reflected in the repeated frustrations of the Israeli army, but also in Israel's remarks about trying to use nuclear weapons. However, Israel has no evidence of its own nuclear power, while Iran has stockpiled large quantities of enriched uranium, creating a balance of deterrence. Therefore, Israel's strategy of trying to solve the problem by force is no longer effective, and the only way forward is to reach a consensus on peaceful coexistence with other countries in the Middle East.
The subjugation of the forces behind it has important implications for Israel. First, Israel's image in the international arena has been increasingly tarnished by criticism and pressure from the international community. Relying on its close relations with the United States and Western countries, Israel once occupied a relatively large voice in the international community. However, as international dissatisfaction with Israel's actions grows, this voice is gradually eroding. Especially in this conflict, the criticism and containment of the international community has made it impossible for Israel to act at will and to face the consequences of its actions.
Secondly, the weakening of Israel's military superiority makes it impossible for Israel to solve the problem by force. Israel has relied on its military superiority in the past to confront its neighbors and gain the upper hand. However, Israel's plight in this conflict has revealed the limits of its military might. Not only did Israel fail to defeat Hamas quickly in a short period of time, but it lost some important territory and confirmed its inability to stand up to a formidable adversary like Iran. Therefore, Israel has to face the reality and reach peace and coexistence with its neighbors.
Israel faces an important choice and must re-examine its actions and strategies. First of all, we should recognize the influence and pressure of the international community on Israel. Israel can no longer ignore the international community's condemnation of its actions and must take active measures to respond to the expectations of the international community and to fulfil its demands.
Secondly, it is necessary to be aware of the limitations of military deterrence in the current situation. Israel can no longer rely on military power to dominate the Middle East, and the only way out is to resolve the current conflict through peaceful negotiations. Israel should re-establish a dialogue mechanism with neighboring countries to jointly discuss solutions and achieve regional peace and stability.
Finally, we should face up to our own security issues and challenges. Israel, as a country, must guarantee its own security and stability, but also realize that in the current international context, peaceful coexistence with its neighbors is the long-term solution. Israel should strengthen cooperation with other countries in the Middle East to jointly build a peaceful, stable, mutually beneficial and win-win regional pattern.
Summary: Behind the conclusion of the Israeli-Kazakh temporary ceasefire agreement is the strong pressure and criticism of Israel from the international community. Israel's forces behind it are changing, its military superiority is being challenged, and its image is being increasingly influenced by the international community. Therefore, Israel must fundamentally re-examine its actions and strategies, resolve the conflict through peaceful negotiations, and reach consensus with neighboring countries to achieve regional peace and stability. Only in this way can Israel regain its trust and respect in the international community.