In the countryside, there is such a group of people who have worked hard to save a lifetime of money just to build a house for themselves. This house is not only a safe haven for them, but also their heart and hope. However, with the adjustment of the policy, these houses may face the fate of being demolished. What's going on?Today, I'm going to uncover this mystery for you.
First of all, we need to understand what "3 dismantling and 2 guarantees" is. This policy is aimed at self-built houses in rural areas, and in simple terms, it requires that self-built houses in rural areas must meet three conditions before they can be retained, otherwise they will be demolished. The three conditions are:1The quality of housing construction must be passed;2.The floor area of the house should be compliant;3.The house must have a legal title certificate. And "2 guarantees" refers to: 1Guarantee the basic housing needs of farmers;2.Safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of farmers.
So, specifically, which rural self-built houses are at risk of being demolished?I summarized the following points:
1.Illegal occupation of land for the construction of houses. These houses are often built haphazardly on their own contracted land without going through a formal approval process. This type of housing not only takes up public resources, but also has an impact on the surrounding environment. Therefore, this type of housing is the focus of policy crackdown.
2.Houses that exceed the prescribed area. According to the policy, there is a limit to the area of self-built houses in rural areas. If the specified area is exceeded, then the excess part is demolished. This is also to ensure the basic housing needs of farmers and avoid the over-construction of individual families that leads to the unmet housing needs of other families.
3.Houses that are not built of the same quality. This type of house may have potential safety hazards, and in the event of an accident, it may endanger the lives and property of surrounding residents. Therefore, the policy requires that such houses must be rectified or demolished.
4.Houses without legal title certificates. This type of house may not have gone through the relevant property ownership procedures due to historical reasons. Although this type of housing is not illegal, it may be affected during the implementation of the policy. In order to avoid disputes, the policy requires that such houses must have a legal title certificate.
In the face of such a policy, how should we farmers respond?I have the following suggestions:
1.Understand the policy. The policy was introduced to protect the basic housing needs and legitimate rights and interests of farmers, not to suppress them. Therefore, we must correctly understand the original intention of the policy and not blindly follow the trend because of panic. Only when we understand the policy can we better deal with it.
2.Self-examination and self-correction. We need to conduct a full inspection of our home to see if it meets the requirements of the policy. If there is a problem, it is necessary to rectify it in time. Only by actively cooperating with the policy can we avoid unnecessary losses.
3.Seek professional help. If we don't know much about the policy, or don't know how to rectify it, we can seek professional help. For example, we can consult the village cadres or ask a professional architect to evaluate and guide. With the help of professionals, we can better cope with policy challenges.
4.Keep communicating. During the implementation of the policy, some misunderstandings and disputes may arise. At this time, we must maintain communication with the first department and reflect our own demands and difficulties in a timely manner. Only through communication can we fight for our legitimate rights and interests.
In short, in the face of the policy of "three demolitions and two guarantees", we farmers must learn to look at it rationally and respond positively. Only in this way can we protect our basic housing needs and legitimate rights and interests in the adjustment of policies.
However, policy changes are always fraught with uncertainty. During the implementation of the policy, some unexpected situations may arise. For example, some farmers may not be able to obtain a legal title certificate for various reasons. At this time, will their house be demolished?The answer to this question will probably be revealed in time.
Of course, I believe that in the process of formulating and implementing policies, we will fully take into account the actual situation of farmers and minimize the impact on farmers. However, as farmers, we must always be vigilant, pay attention to the dynamics of policies, and take good measures to deal with them. Only in this way can we stand firmly on our own position in the wave of policies.
Finally, I would like to say that self-built houses in rural areas are the hard work and hope of our farmers. We must cherish this hard-won achievement, and we must strive to improve our living standards. In this process, policy guidance and support are indispensable. Let's work together for a better future!