Two days ago, when Zhang Xuefeng was in Lianmai, he was with a college entrance examination candidate and his parents.
To say that after graduating from liberal arts majors, the work is all in the service industry, which is to lick others.
This remark aroused the disgust of some people, and to be honest, there is some truth in his words, and in any case, the phenomenon does exist.
Personally, I feel that Zhang Xuefeng's statement has always been more extreme and cannot be fully believed.
He is strongly subjective about many things. In fact, it is easy to understand, and it is likely to be a way to persuade others.
Looking at many of his live speeches, live broadcasts, etc., it can be seen that he is trying to output his views in a hoarse and hysterical way to dispel other people's doubts.
Talking pompously in front of the camera is to buy a class, and it is not something that makes you think.
I don't agree with what he said about the problem that liberal arts students should lick after graduation.
Any major, whether it is science or liberal arts, has its reason for existence, its value, and its way of survival.
The key is not the major, but the people who learn and use the major.
In fact, when it comes to the so-called licking, all those who live in this world,Who can really do whatever they want and not be bound by anyone?
Could it be that if you study science, there is no superior-subordinate relationship?There is no such thing as Party A or Party BIs there no such thing as a buyer-seller relationship?
What matters is not whether this relationship will exist in your industry, but what kind of mentality you have to look at such a relationship.
In reality, it's not just liberal arts majors that have some jobs to lick others.
As long as there is an industry that provides services to others, it must serve Party A's father.
What does Party A ask, you can only earn money after you do it.
Even if you are a big star, if someone asks you to advertise, you have to say the advertising words according to Party A's requirements.
The advertisements required by the customer are presented, and when Yu says that he is 'coaxed' to be happy, he can get the final payment.
The word licking is a bit rough, but that's mostly the way it is.
Licking is replaced by coaxing, cooperating, collaboration, all the same.
After Zhang Xuefeng's incident, several ** companies commented.
Roughly speaking, as a public figure, you must have correct values and play an exemplary role in promoting positive energy.
You can't always promote utilitarian ideas, you also have to promote ideals.
I think it makes sense, both are important, and you can't just emphasize one side or the other.
On the one hand, people have to think about survival
On the other hand, it is also necessary to consider the question of ideals.
Zhang Xuefeng is just a boss, has his own company, and uses his business knowledge to pay people to do planning.
There is no need to myth, and there is no need to use him as a representative. You believe in him, you can come to him if you have needs, and if you don't believe in him, you won't let your life be defined.
This sentence summarizes "service industry" as "licking", which is indeed quite excessive.
The service industry practitioners around them, from the high-level legal or financial services industry to the basic service industry such as catering waiters, do not have so many "licking" superiors.
Many of Zhang Xuefeng's words are actually in a specific environment, aiming at the audience who asked him questions, and adopted some more radical expressions in order to achieve the goal of persuasion.
As a public figure, he should indeed give more consideration to his speech, and if he says too much, he will lose.
Celebrities have a lot to say online, and it's normal to say a few more controversial words.
But just looking at the live broadcast slice of the day, he has actually stacked a lot of buffs for himself.
Those who provoke the theory of the uselessness of liberal arts" and stigmatize the service industry should be those who do not combine context and context, wantonly take words out of context and disseminate them, and over-interpret and criticize them.
PS: Zhang Xuefeng has already said in a previous speech that he opposes the "theory of the uselessness of liberal arts".
Why can Zhang Xuefeng's words be respected by people and resonate with many ordinary migrant workers?
Or is it from reality.
Ordinary people, what do they want?
A suitable job, a stable income, a happy family life.
Of course, happiness is not only material, but also spiritual.
But if you can't eat enough, how can you talk about being happy?
That's why so many parents ask Zhang Xuefeng what major their children should choose, how to get a good job, and don't have to endure hardships.
To some extent, Zhang Xuefeng's fire is the same as the trend of the times.
Now everyone is in a hurry to find a job, and they are afraid that they will choose a bad major, enter the wrong industry, and waste ten years in vain.
Can you say that this mentality is not right and utilitarian?
People have to feed themselves before they talk about ideals, and this society pushes the masses to do so.
If you don't do this, you have to find an industry that you like but doesn't have a high salary, and you will be under a lot of pressure in the future.
It doesn't matter if the choice between liberal arts and science is good or bad, some are just suitable and inappropriate.
Some tolerance should be given to those who do not seem to be chasing their ideals, and some tolerance should also be given to those who tell the truth.