The original voluntary and spontaneous warm-hearted public welfare turned out to be compulsory. Recently, a blood donation notice from Harbin Institute of Finance has caused many questions. On December 12, some netizens broke the news that a counselor of the college issued a notice in the group asking for mandatory blood donation, and party members, class cadres and party activists who do not participate in blood donation will be disqualified from awards, evaluations, and party membership. However, the relevant staff of the college's investment insurance department responded that it was only mobilization, not compulsion.
The two sides have formed a contradiction, whether it is mobilization or coercion?Actually, it's not that hard to analyze. According to the screenshot of the chat provided by netizens, the counselor's original words in the group were, "If I don't have any problems with my physical constitution and retreat when I see this kind of thing, then next time we will award and evaluate the best, what those who develop party members, I will definitely not consider it." The causal relationship between blood donation and evaluation is very obvious in the words, and those who do not donate blood must also write down the reason, such a strong sense of oppression, what is not compulsion?
For blood donation, a life-saving public welfare behavior, vigorously publicize and advocate, give symbolic rewards, and give appropriate points to students who have good deeds in the evaluation process, I believe that the vast majority of people are enough to accept it. However, when voluntary actions become a factor that seriously affects or even determines vital interests, positive encouragement leads to reverse threats and moral kidnapping, which is contrary to the essence of public welfare.
Unpaid blood donation is not a compulsory blood donation, and blood donation must follow the principle of voluntary, which is a legal requirement and must be clarified and insisted on at all times. The counselor mentioned in the notice that blood donation should "complete the target", since it is a voluntary act, how can it be said to "complete the target"?Who is using the big stick of assessment to put pressure on the love offering?If it is a task assigned by the school, who can guarantee that the school will not have other acts that violate the "voluntary" infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of students?If the counselor adds drama to himself for the sake of his work, he can easily determine the student's "power of life and death" with such a single assessment factor, and it is extremely scary to think about how to talk about educational fairness. As a bridge between students and the school, counselors need to lead by example and set a good example for students. Holding chicken feathers as arrows, the working methods are simple and rude, and in the end they will only shape a deformed teacher-student relationship.
Recently, several news about the link between blood donation and interest assessment have frequently appeared on the hot search, which to a certain extent reflects the dilemma of "unpaid blood donation". Calling on more people to donate blood is not only to do moral advocacy and exert pressure, it is fundamentally to implement the relevant regulations of the state, propaganda can not be sloganized and superficial, and it is necessary to use comprehensive and targeted science popularization to eliminate the public's worries about blood donation, in addition, it is also necessary to make it clear that the country's advocacy of "unpaid blood donation is glorious" is not empty, and unpaid blood donors and their relatives have the right to give priority to blood and reduce fees, which is a powerful call for "unpaid blood donation".
The essence of public welfare is mutual assistance, not complete altruism. Calling on more people to participate in public welfare, to let the public truly realize that this is the public interest of all members of society, and to carry out moral kidnapping in a clear way will only make love deformed and good people chill.
Commentator: Yang Jinxing
Production: Zhai Haoyu
Editor-in-charge: Yang Yang.