Many people said that there are some doll "officials" in the townships and towns, who are not very old, and who lead the work of a group of old comrades from the uncles and grandfathers, and they are not very "talkative."
It was also stated that these young dolls led:
The phenomenon of insufficient work ability is quite conspicuous, and the graduation time is not long ago, and they do not know enough about the grassroots level, lack the experience of dealing with the common people, and still less have the consciousness to go out from the masses.
There are also many negative comments about young cadres. I won't list them all here.
The author believes that there is no problem with the rejuvenation of cadres, and it is also the work need of the combination of the three generations of "old, middle-aged and young", which has a far-reaching impact on optimizing the cadre structure. Some young cadres are energetic, passionate, and enterprising, and many of them have made many outstanding achievements in their posts.
As a matter of fact, the author believes that the rejuvenation of township and town cadres is not a problem, but a question is how young cadres are "recommended."
As we all know, our inspection of cadres mainly examines "morality, ability, diligence and honesty", and the procedure behind it is "".Moving, recommending, examining, discussing, and appointing, "moving" is the premise, that is, there are vacancies and personnel who meet the conditions, and "recommendation" is the key, which is more important than the so-called "vote"!
Because of the ban on the use of votes to win people, some cadres are very capable of work, but because they have many officers, they will offend some people, resulting in a low number of votes, while another kind of people are not good at work, but they are good at pulling connections and forming gangs, and the number of votes may be even higher.It can be seen from this that the vote is not the most important thing in the promotion of township and town cadres, and I think what I said above is also reasonable. "Tickets" are not important, so what is the most important?
The most important thing is "recommended", this is not what I said, this is an official copy. Because the vote itself is a recommendation, but the number of votes does not affect the "recommendation", therefore, many problems lie in this "recommendation".
The author has heard of a post-90s leader, who joined the work in 2012, successively served as a section member, and a deputy section member, and in 2021, he was promoted from a member to the mayor of the town in one fell swoop, and passed the two hurdles of deputy secretary and chairman of the National People's Congress, which also caused a local sensation at that time. He became the youngest mayor of the local town.
Almost every promotion has someone "recommending", and the key step is to "recommend", as an ordinary deputy section-level cadre in a township or township, he can stand out among tens of millions of people, and he is indeed excellent.
Moreover, his ability to work is not bad, although inexperienced, but that is not his shortcoming, but his merit - strong plasticity!
Therefore, the key to young cadres moving to leadership positions is to look at "recommendation." If people who are qualified and capable of "recommending" outstanding young cadres can "recommend" outstanding young cadres, then young cadres are not a problem, but if those who are "recommended" "recommend" some people who rely on nepotism, ancestral influence, and money to take up positions, it will definitely be a disaster for the townships and towns.
Promotion and promotion are also the most important means for townships and towns to mobilize the enthusiasm of cadres in their work. If there is a problem in the "recommendation," it is not only a problem of hitting the enthusiasm of cadres, but also affects the development of a township and township, and is a very serious problem.
With regard to the issue of promoting cadres, we must be extremely cautious, and in line with the principle of being beneficial to development, we must "recommend" outstanding young cadres and thoroughly break the abnormal recommendation mechanism of "one word from others and ten years of hard work." It is necessary to give full consideration to what kind of person to "recommend" and why we should "recommend" him instead of him; only after full discussion and full democracy can we go to the townships and towns with "hats"; in this way, it is no longer a big problem for cadres to be younger and less experienced.
on the Internet.