On December 31, Beijing time, the game between the Lakers and the Timberwolves staged a controversial battle of a three-point tie, and the CBA court also fell into a whirlpool due to the penalty controversy. Fans hotly discussed the referee's penalty, the CBA company quickly punished it, and overnight, the basketball world boiled.
James equalized the three-pointer: a small step on the line sparked heated discussions.
The Lakers' game against the Timberwolves had its most exciting moment in the final quarter, with James with 2 minutes left in the gameThree seconds into the left 45-degree three-point line, he hit a jump-up shot, but the referee only awarded two points. Video replay shows that James did not step on the line when he stood up, but at the moment of jumping, the toe of his shoe seemed to touch the three-point line slightly, and the difference was only 1 millimeter.
Fans and ** have been hotly discussing this, and there are ** photos that James's stepping on the line is tiny, which is insignificant compared to Durant's stepping on the line when he grabbed seven. However, the controversy also raised questions about the quality of the referees, with the NBA replay center's decision causing displeasure to James, who bluntly admitted that he did not step on the line and criticized the replay center for having problems.
CBA game: Penalty detonates ** storm.
At the same time, there was also a penalty controversy in the CBA arena, and Guangdong's match against Tianjin became the focus. Tianjin foreign player James performed eye-catchingly, slashing 51 points and 15 rebounds, leading the team to lead at the end of the game. However, in the last minute of the game, the referee did not judge Zhou Qi's elbow foul on James, but instead recognized Zhou Qi's 2+1 attack. This penalty has caused fans to question the level of CBA referees, and the controversy continues.
At the critical moment, Zhou Qi and James competed for rebounds, but the referee did not make a foul penalty, but recognized Zhou Qi's 2+1 offense, and finally Guangdong counterattacked and won. This penalty has sparked questions among fans about the level of CBA referees, and controversy continues.
James' move has become the focus of controversy, and the Lakers' record is worrying.
The Lakers moved to 17-16 after a three-point dispute and were overtaken by the Suns to ninth in the West. In this season's games against the top six in the West, the Lakers only have a 2-8 record, and the situation is not optimistic.
After the game, one of James' moves became the focus of controversy. With 26 seconds left in the game, the Lakers trailed by five points, but chose not to foul and let their opponents run out of 24 seconds, a decision that was seen as a possible signal that the Lakers were unwilling to win. This has raised questions among fans about the team's tactics and decision-making.
The CBA company quickly punished Adijiang.
At the same time, the CBA quickly punished Adijiang's remarks, deciding to fine 20,000 yuan in just 13 hours. Adijiang's remarks involved questioning the referee, which did not comply with league rules, and was punished for this.
The CBA's efficient penalties once again highlight the strict enforcement of the league's rules. Adijiang's remarks not only sparked controversy among fans, but also cost him financially.
*Repercussions: Fans are talking about the level of referees.
The entire basketball world has been embroiled in heated discussions over the all-out three-point and CBA game penalty controversy. Fans have expressed their opinions and questioned the quality of the referees. In the comments of netizens, some people supported James and believed that his equalizing three-point was legitimate, while another part of the fans believed that the referee's decision was unanimous and James did step on the line.
On social **, fans launched a heated debate, and the comment area became a battlefield where all parties collided with each other. Some netizens joked, "The referee's eyes seem to be farther than we can see." This kind of playful remarks reflects the fans' dissatisfaction with the quality of the referees.
Epilogue. 
Referee decisions in basketball are always the focus of attention. James' game-tying three-pointer and the CBA game's penalty controversy have once again sparked a discussion among fans about the level of refereeing. Differing opinions collide violently on social media, and the efficient punishment of CBA companies also shows that the league strictly enforces the rules. In this turmoil, the basketball world has launched a feast of speculation, and the question of the referee's level may become a hot topic of discussion in the future. The basketball game is not only a fierce showdown on the court, but also a sports event.