In last night's match between Shanxi and Shenzhen, the referee's enforcement sparked controversy. Especially in the first half, the Shanxi playersChang LinThe elbow that knocked Gu Quan to the ground was ignored by the referee, and Gu Quan was ejected due to dissatisfaction with the referee. The decision was shocking and incomprehensible to the fans.
Here's how it happened: in an offensive round of the Shanxi team,Chang Linand He Xining and Gu Quan of the Shenzhen team were entangled when they were competing for rebounds under the basket. Chang LinNot noticing Gu Quan behind him when he was stuck with He Xining, he swung his elbow and hit Gu Quan in the chest, knocking him to the ground. Gu Quan lay on the ground in pain for a long time and did not get up, while the referee did not make any indication and did not check the replay. Afterwards, the commentator said that this scene was worth replaying**, but the referee kept ignoring it. Slow-motion playback clearly shows that this is a glaring omission. After Gu Quan was helped up by his teammates, he negotiated with the referee and said that he was helpedChang LinThe elbow knocked out, and it should be judgedChang LinFoul, but the referee ignored it. This infuriated Gu Quan, and the player, who had always been known for his good temper, immediately hurled insults at the referee. The referee first gave Gu Quan a technical foul, and then Gu Quan was directly ejected from the game for continuing to swear at the referee. Even after being expelled from the field, Gu Quan continued to blame the referee and angrily insult him. Gu Quan has always shown a good temper, and such angry and abusive behavior has never been seen before. Previously,Zhou QiwithJamesThere was a collision while scrambling for a rebound, but the action was far from thereChang LinThe elbow hit was so big that the fans forJamesCorrect name, thinkZhou QiShould be given a foul. However, in that collisionJamesDidn't fall to the ground, just lost his balance slightly. In contrast, last night's Gu Quan suffered a completely different situation, he wasChang Lin's elbow knocked him to the ground, but the referee didn't decideChang LinFouls, it really doesn't make sense. And the Heilongjiang referee Yang Peng (No. 67), who led to Gu Quan's expulsion, also bears unshirkable responsibility.
Although Gu Quan's abusive behavior is wrong, if the referee can enforce the law correctly, it will not be missedChang Lin's foul, so will the gentle Gu Quan insult the referee?Apparently not. Gu Quan did have some grievancesChang LinNo fouls were drawn, and he himself was ejected for it. Fans have said that this referee's behavior is too dark, and some people have demanded that such a referee be fired.
As the game progressed, more and more fans began to express their dissatisfaction with the referee's decision, and even questioned whether he deliberately favored the Shanxi team. Not only was Gu Quan's expulsion questioned, but other sentences were also controversial.
Shanxi team membersChang LinThe elbow strike clearly deserves to be considered a foul, but the referee lacks the proper response and completely ignores the obvious foul. This left fans angry and disappointed, believing that the referee's favoritism led to an imbalance throughout the match.
The No. 67 referee Yang Peng from Heilongjiang made frequent mistakes in last night's game, especially for obvious foul misses, which left a deep impression on the fans.
In addition to neglectChang LinIn addition to the elbow strike, the referee also made mistakes in other decisions. Some fans pointed out that the referee was more lenient in the foul punishment for the Shanxi team, while the punishment for the Shenzhen team was relatively harsh. This partiality was repeated throughout the game, calling into question the credibility of the referee's decision.
The referee's mistakes and unfair decisions sparked strong discontent among the fans. Many fans began to call for the expulsion of the Heilongjiang No. 67 referee.
Such a call is for the maintenance of fair competition and the requirement for the credibility of referees. Fans expect referees to treat every game with fairness and objectivity, without being influenced by any factors.
As the enforcers of the game, the referee has the responsibility to maintain fair play. However, in last night's match, the referee's unfair enforcement sparked controversy and questioning.
Chang LinThe elbow strike clearly deserved to be punished, but it was not dealt with properly, and Gu Quan was ejected due to dissatisfaction with the referee. Such a decision undoubtedly distorted the fairness of the game, and also caused disappointment and anger among the fans.
Referees should treat every game with a fair and objective attitude, so as to be discerning and enforce the law fairly. Fans hope that the referees will recognize their mistakes and perform their duties in a more fair way in future matches to bring a truly fair game to the spectators.
It is the responsibility of the referee to enforce the law fairly, but in last night's game, No. 67 referee Yang Peng made frequent mistakes, especially missed judgmentsChang LinThe elbow strike behavior caused dissatisfaction and ** among the fans. Fans called for the expulsion of such Heilongjiang referees, and hoped that the referees would recognize their mistakes, improve the level of law enforcement, and maintain the fairness of the game.
As a knowledgeable editor, I am also outraged and disappointed to see such a mistake and unfair enforcement by the referee. Impartial law enforcement is the duty and mission of every referee, and their law enforcement should be objective, fair and accurate. However, in last night's game, No. 67 referee Yang Peng frequently made wrong decisions and missed judgments, which had a serious impact on the fairness of the game. Personally, I believe that referees should be strict with themselves, improve their enforcement skills, and present a truly fair and exciting game for the audience. At the same time, the relevant management departments should also conduct stricter training and assessment of referees to ensure that their law enforcement level is more professional and accurate. Only in this way can we effectively safeguard the fairness of the competition and the rights and interests of the audience.