The performance of the Chinese men's basketball team in recent years has attracted the attention of fans, but it is not satisfactory. Many people are looking for reasons and have found out that Yao Ming made three reforms since taking office, which made the performance of the Chinese men's basketball team even worse. Specifically, the three reforms are the creation of a talent pool, the separation of management and management, and the appointment of the head coach of the national team. However, these reforms have not done anything to promote the development of the Chinese men's basketball team, but have only made things worse. First, set up a talent pool. Although this reform seems to be done only by the Chinese Basketball Association around the world, it has not helped much for the development of the national team. The selection criteria for the talent pool are not clear, resulting in many capable players being left out.
Even young talents like Zhao Jiayi, Jiao Boqiao, and Li Yanzhe cannot enter the talent pool. This also makes people wonder, shouldn't the national team select players based on their strength?Why do you want to set up so many meaningless systems to hinder them?Second, the separation of management and management. This reform is modeled after the professional basketball league in the United States, but the national conditions of China and the United States are different, so the two are not comparable. Although the Basketball Association does not have the right to govern the CBA, the joint ownership of the 20 teams in the CBA has made the relegation and relegation system meaningless. As a result, some teams have started to play with impunity, not to put in and not to operate, even if they don't win a game for the whole season. As a result, the motivation of the players and the competitiveness of the game have been greatly affected, which is obviously not a good thing.
Finally, the appointment of the head coach of the national team. Yao Ming changed the selection method of the national team head coach from an invitation system to a competition system, allowing coaches who are willing to play for the country to compete openly. However, this approach has led to the reluctance of capable senior coaches to come. On the contrary, only some coaches with poor ability came to apply, which greatly reduced the coaching level of the national team. Li Nan and Du Feng are examples of failure, and the Serbian coach Djordjevic, who was hired heavily this year, did not perform satisfactorily. Obviously, this is also one of the important reasons for the poor performance of the Chinese men's basketball team. Although Yao Ming's original intention to introduce these three reforms was good, the actual effect was reversed. This makes a lot of people feel sorry.
What the Chinese men's basketball team needs is some practical reforms, not some overly idealistic ideas. Only in this way can we make our basketball career flourish and return to the top.