Ukraine ** Zelensky in order to fightRussian armyThe goal of evacuating the territory of Ukraine was put forward under a draconian condition: only in Ukraine to regain beenRussian armyAfter the encroachment on all the territories, they were willing to resume negotiations and ceasefire. This condition can be said to be reasonable and reasonable in the context of war. However, the Ukrainian army has not achieved any major results on the front line since its launch in June this year, resulting in the Ukrainian side having no substantial bargaining chips to force the Russian side to return its territory. This reality has prompted a different voice within Ukraine.
David Arakhamia, chairman of the Verkhovna Rada (parliament) of Ukraine's ruling Servant of the People party, said in a recent interview that Russia and Ukraine basically reached an agreement in the negotiations, but due to the obstruction of former British Prime Minister Johnson, Ukraine tore up the agreement, which led to the conflict that has continued to this day. This statement shows that some Ukraine regretted that it relied too much on Western countries in the past to solve problems, and this has led to Ukraine's current predicament. If Ukraine had recognized the situation in advance and responded positively to Russia's conditions in the early stages of the conflict, the current situation could have been alleviated. Putin has said that as long as the Ukrainian side remains neutral,Russian armywill withdraw. It's never too late to make amends.
Recently, a report in the Global Times quoted the famous American journalist Seymour Hersh as saying that UkraineArmedThe commander-in-chief of the troops, Zaluzhny, is privately talkingRussian armyChief of the General Staff Gerasimov conducts peace negotiations. This information has attracted a lot of attention. According to Hersh, the conditions given by the Russian side are still quite harsh, requiring Ukraine to remain neutral and not to deploy offensive forces within its territoryand the army, and recognize Kherson, Zaporozhye, Donbass andCrimeaBelongs to Russia. Although it is possible for Zaluzhny to contact Gerasimov for negotiations as commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, it will be difficult to implement regardless of the outcome of the negotiations between the two sides, because the majority of the Ukrainian population opposes a ceasefire and negotiations without recovering the territory. Public opinion is irreversible, even if Zelensky and Biden want a ceasefire, but if the vast majority of Ukrainians insist on recovering all lost territory, then the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is likely not to end.
Ukraine's total population before the war was about 40 million, but after the war the population plummeted to more than 20 million. As the conflict continues, more and more of the main fighting factions are being attackedRussian armyElimination, Ukraine's ability to resist is gradually weakening. The possibility of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine will only appear when the tough voices within Ukraine gradually fade away. Russia is also already preparing for a long war, and Putin has announced another military expansionRussian armyThe total number of troops will reach 2.2 million. In addition,Russian armyThe production of ammunition has surged, not only for front-line combat needs, but also for newly created unitsArmedto ensure the formation of combat effectiveness as soon as possible. The Russian war machine has been activated, and Ukraine seems to have no other choice but to fight to the death.
However, the pluralism of Ukrainian society and internal contradictions and divisions complicate the prospects for a ceasefire and negotiations. There is a section of the population that firmly advocates that Ukraine should continue to regain lost territory and defend its territorial integrity; The other part wants an early ceasefire to end the long war. In the face of the diverse voices of the people, Ukraine** and Zelensky** must do their best to meet the expectations and demands of the people while balancing internal and external pressures.
Tensions between Ukraine and Russia have been going on for a long time. InternationalSociety's support for Ukraine and the efforts of all parties hope to resolve this crisis. However, internal divisions and confrontations of forces in Ukraine make the solution of the problem more difficult. Despite the possibility of peace talks, there are still huge differences in the interests, attitudes and bottom lines of the two sides. Moreover, the pluralism of Ukrainian society and the role of various complex factors also add to the complexity of the solution.
As observers, we cannot ignore Ukraine andUkrainiansThe great price paid by the people in this conflict. War has not only brought material destruction and human life, but has also had a serious impact on many aspects of social, economic, human rights and humanitarian issues. Therefore, it is essential to find a peaceful solution. InternationalSociety should continue to play its active role in promoting solutions through dialogue and diplomacy. At the same time, Ukraine** should also listen to the voices of all parties in the country and provide possible conditions and opportunities for a peaceful settlement.
Our role in this matter is to document and present the facts in the hope that more people will understand the real situation and the story behind it. In the course of future peace negotiations, we hope to see Ukraine and Russia find a fair and sustainable solution that will bring peace, stability and prosperity to both peoples. The vision of peace and coexistence can be achieved only through dialogue and mutual humility.