“All liberal arts majors are called service industries, and the service industry can be summed up in one word: 'licking'. Party A is right, you are right, you are good, I will give you a smile, this is called the service industry. This is the public evaluation of Zhang Xuefeng, an Internet celebrity who is praised as a volunteer expert for the college entrance examination and a famous teacher for the postgraduate entrance examination, for liberal arts majors, liberal arts students and the service industry.
The above remarks were made by Zhang Xuefeng when he answered questions from netizens in the live broadcast room of nearly 10,000 people in early December this year, and quickly appeared on Weibo hot search with this remark, causing countless controversies.
Some people think that what he said is right, they have the impression that liberal arts students are like this, the threshold for learning liberal arts is low, and if you want to mix well, you must constantly "lick" customers and "lick" leaders, which is not as good as science students with professional skills and do not need to look at people's colors.
However, some people objected, suspecting that they did not understand the value of liberal arts at all, and that they were only purely utilitarian, and even erased the progress of civilization that countless liberal arts students have promoted regardless of personal fame and fortune.
Regarding the views on the above remarks, this issue wrote "Why Should Zhang Xuefeng Apologize?".: Kneel down, don't think that others are soft on their knees", deeply opposed to Zhang Xuefeng's point of view, thinking that he adheres to the traffic understanding of instilling a realistic utilitarian view to the audience, and caters to the psychological needs of many parents and students, but it is definitely a rod to overturn all liberal arts students, misleading the society's understanding of liberal arts majors and liberal arts students, and promoting the wrong children who do not distinguish between right and wrong and have no bottom line, and even harm others and society, and give him a sentence:You can't stand up straight and kneel, please don't take it for granted that everyone has the same weak knees as you!
In addition, it is mentioned in the text that if "When Zhang Xuefeng encounters disputes and injustice, he will choose only'Sales'、Only'Lick'of lawyers, defend themselves, for their own ** case"?Unexpectedly, the prophecy in the article came so quickly, and Zhang Xuefeng needed a lawyer so soon, because he was accused because of the above public remarks, and the court has already filed the case.
After the controversy caused by the remarks that all liberal arts majors are called service industries, Zhang Xuefeng posted a response on his personal social account: "Did I say the wrong thing again, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'll give everyone a laugh!."What am I doing, I'm licking too. But I don't think there's anything wrong with that!He also said in the comment area, "There is nothing wrong with doing the service industry, but some people can't get over this hurdle in their hearts, I can pass, I will do the service industry." If you can't get by, you're not fit to be in the service industry. If you have to interpret it maliciously, I apologize to you if you are sad to read my remarks. ”
Obviously, this kind of apology with sticks has not been recognized by everyone. On January 8, blogger "Gu Yanyou" posted on Weibo that he had sued Zhang Xuefeng for remarks such as "liberal arts and sciences are service industries", and that the case had been accepted by the Huqiu District People's Court of Suzhou City. Blogger "Gu Yanyou" said that he and Zhang Xuefeng have no personal grudges, and the purpose of doing this is to eliminate the social prejudice against liberal arts students caused by Zhang Xuefeng's remarks. Here is the content of the "indictment":
On the evening of January 8, Zhang Xuefeng posted a Weibo, suspected of responding to the above incident: "When I was walking just now, a dog barked at me, thinking that it was already miserable, and it had to bark to attract my attention, it was unnecessary." ”
On the evening of the 8th, Zhang Xuefeng talked about being sued again in the live broadcast room, and he believed that he was also engaged in the service industry, and he did not mean to belittle liberal arts. and pointed out that the other party was rubbing traffic, and he wanted to be popular and wanted to go crazy, so he suggested that he wanted to be popular and rub more famous people. Zhang Xuefeng also said: "As soon as I say that you are in the service industry, you will not be happy, and the person who really looks down on the service industry is me or you, but it is still the same sentence, appeal, this person is 90% good, and he is relatively a little more tolerant." ”
From "barking" to "pointing out that the other party is rubbing traffic" to "being relatively lenient with him", it seems that Zhang Xuefeng is full of confidence in this lawsuit, still thinks that what he said is good, and is full of confidence in the next judicial proceedings.
Is that really the case?Yan Yujun thinks: Zhang Xuefeng must lose this lawsuit!Unless "Gu Yanyou" can't withstand the wave of ** momentum and online violence launched by Zhang Xuefeng and his supporters, he loses the battle and chooses to withdraw the lawsuit or accept a secret settlement.
Reputation is a social evaluation of the moral character, prestige, talent, and credit of a civil subject. Article 1024 of the Civil Code stipulates that civil subjects enjoy the right to reputation, and no organization or individual may infringe upon the right to reputation of others by insulting, defaming, etc. Where the right to reputation is infringed, the victim has the right to demand that the infringer bear civil liability in accordance with law, including stopping the infringement, removing obstacles, eliminating dangers, eliminating impacts, restoring reputation, and making formal apologies.
Hundreds of millions of liberal arts students, who have obtained their diplomas and professional knowledge through decades of hard study, deserve to be positively evaluated by society. If everyone is engaged in a profession that serves human beings and others, it can still be explained, but Zhang Xuefeng's "service industry can be summed up in one word: 'licking'." Party A is right, you are right, you are good, I will give you a smile, this is called the service industry".Among them, words such as "licking", "Party A is right", "I'll give you a smile", etc., as long as you have basic language knowledge, you know that they have obvious derogatory connotations, which will cause the public to have a negative evaluation of all liberal arts students. This undoubtedly has insulting implications.
Some people will say that they agree with Zhang Xuefeng's evaluation of liberal arts students, and think that the same is true of social reality. However, even if you think so that the Internet big V thinks so, and you do it yourself, it does not mean that you can generalize that all liberal arts students are "licking" and giving "Party A" a bottomless "laugh".
If this were the case, there would be no liberal arts students who would write to the National People's Congress to oppose the "joint sitting" system implemented in some localitiesThere will be no liberal arts students who openly question their papers, and the openness and independence of the judgment document network will be weakened;There will be no defense lawyer who will risk being punished and use various methods to demand redress in unjust cases.
Some liberal arts students may think that they belong to the "licking" group, but it does not mean that all liberal arts students recognize this title. Since Zhang Xuefeng clearly said "all liberal arts majors" in the live broadcast, that is to say, those liberal arts students who do not consider themselves to make a living by "licking" are also within the scope of its derogation.
Article 1025 of the Civil Code stipulates that if an actor carries out news reporting, supervision and other acts for the public interest, affecting the reputation of others, he shall not bear civil liability, except in any of the following circumstances: (1) fabricating or distorting facts;(2) Failing to fulfill the obligation to reasonably verify seriously inaccurate content provided by others;(c).Use insulting language to disparage the reputation of others。Obviously, Zhang Xuefeng does not have a statutory exemption.
Some believe that Zhang Xuefeng has publicly apologized before. The meaning of an apology is that it needs to be accepted by the other party, or it has been reviewed and approved by the judicial organs, and it is not a nominal apology by oneself, and the content can be written as much as you want. As for the people he questioned, he was "rubbing traffic", obviously he started by traffic, and he was the kind that didn't talk amazingly, but he questioned others
After Zhang Xuefeng derogated all liberal arts majors and liberal arts students, he also took out the lawyer profession among liberal arts students as an example, saying that lawyers are sales, the kind that sells themselves in every possible way. Now, Zhang Xuefeng has become a defendant, and it is possible to attract countless defendants, I don't know what kind of lawyer he will "buy" as "Party A" to "buy" his own ** case, and will he ask his lawyer to "lick" himself?
Finally, I would like to remind you that the judges who heard this case are also from liberal arts, that is, what Zhang Xuefeng called the "service industry". When I got to the court, I don't know if Zhang Xuefeng could ask the judge to "laugh at him"?
Those who can stand up in the "silent majority" are brave!Although there are many unprofessional aspects of the "indictment", Yanyujun strongly supports the plaintiff and his litigation claims!I believe that the judiciary can make a fair ruling, so that those who blindly please the audience and have a long memory, don't think that they can represent the whole, and hundreds of millions of liberal arts students should acquiesce to the "title" he gave.
Note: This article is the original article of "Tobacco Grammar".